Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 457–466 | Cite as

Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus)

Original Paper

Abstract

Twenty domestic horses (Equus caballus) were tested for their ability to rely on different human gesticular cues in a two-way object choice task. An experimenter hid food under one of two bowls and after baiting, indicated the location of the food to the subjects by using one of four different cues. Horses could locate the hidden reward on the basis of the distal dynamic-sustained, proximal momentary and proximal dynamic-sustained pointing gestures but failed to perform above chance level when the experimenter performed a distal momentary pointing gesture. The results revealed that horses could rely spontaneously on those cues that could have a stimulus or local enhancement effect, but the possible comprehension of the distal momentary pointing remained unclear. The results are discussed with reference to the involvement of various factors such as predisposition to read human visual cues, the effect of domestication and extensive social experience and the nature of the gesture used by the experimenter in comparative investigations.

Keywords

Human–animal communication Pointing Horse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Rita Lénárd and Krisztina Kurucz, the caretakers (and partly the owners) of the ponies of the Budapest Zoo. We also thank Péter Tóth, Rita Nánási and Gyula Mészáros for their help and support in working with the other horses and the horse owners for their cooperation. In addition, we thank Celeste Pongracz for reviewing the English and the four anonym reviewers for their revision of the manuscript. We confirm that our research was done in adherence to the Guidelines for the use of animals in research and the national laws of Hungary about the animal welfare and abusement.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Call J, Tomasello M (1994) Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 108:307–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll J, Murphy CJ, Neitz M, Ver Hoeve JN, Neitz J (2001). Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in the horse. J Vis 1:80–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock J (1999) A natural history of domesticated mammals. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall CA, Cassaday HJ, Derrington AM (2003) The effect of stimulus height on visual discrimination in horses. J Anim Sci 81:1715–1720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N, Schepina O, Stepika A, Wrangham R, Trut L (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol 15:226–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauser M (1996) The evolution of communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman LM, Abichandani SL, Elhajj AN, Herman EYK, Sanchez JL Pack AA (1999) Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing gesture. J Comp Psychol 113:347–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Itakura S, Tanaka M (1998) Use of experimenter given cues during object-choice task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 112:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen T, Forster P, Levine Marsha A, Oelke H, Hurles M, Renfrew C, Weber J, Olek K (2002) Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10905–10910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGreevy P (2004) Equine behavior. A guide for veterinarians and equine scientists. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  14. McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McLean AN (2004) Short-term spatial memory in the domestic horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 85:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119(2):179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neiworth JJ, Burman MA, Basile BM, Lickteig MT (2002) Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a new world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 116:3–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicol CJ (2002) Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pack AA, Herman LM (2004) Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 118:160–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfungst O (1911) Clever Hans, the horse of Mr. von Osten. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Povinelli DJ, Reaux JE, Bierschwale DT, Allain AD Simon BB (1997) Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees. Cogn Dev 12:423–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheuman M, Call J (2004) The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim Cogn 7:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dog’s (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vick S, Anderson JR (2000) Learning and limits of use of eye gaze by capuchin monkeys (Cebus paella) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 114:200–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0127-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Waring GH (1983) Horse behavior. The behavioral traits and adaptations of domestic and wild horses, including ponies. Noyes PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organic Agriculture and Animal WelfareSzent István UniversityGödöllőHungary
  2. 2.Department of EthologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations