Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 431–439 | Cite as

Horse sense: social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses’ behavior

Original Paper

Abstract

Animals that live in stable social groups need to gather information on their own relative position in the group’s social hierarchy, by either directly threatening or by challenging others, or indirectly and in a less perilous manner , by observing interactions among others. Indirect inference of dominance relationships has previously been reported from primates, rats, birds, and fish. Here, we show that domestic horses, Equus caballus, are similarly capable of social cognition. Taking advantage of a specific “following behavior” that horses show towards humans in a riding arena, we investigated whether bystander horses adjust their response to an experimenter according to the observed interaction and their own dominance relationship with the horse whose reaction to the experimenter they had observed before. Horses copied the “following behavior” towards an experimenter after watching a dominant horse following but did not follow after observing a subordinate horse or a horse from another social group doing so. The “following behavior,” which horses show towards an experimenter, therefore appears to be affected by the demonstrator’s behavior and social status relative to the observer.

Keywords

Copying Horse Social cognition Sociality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Bernd Kramer, Beat Tschanz, Fritz Trillmich, Katherine Houpt, Norbert Sachser, and Michael Tomasello for helpful discussion, as well as Elisabeth D`Antoni for language correction and the horse owners for providing us with their horses. The study was supported by an HWP II grant of the University of Regensburg. We declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

References

  1. Acuna BD, Sanes JN, Donoghue JP (2002) Cognitive mechanisms of transitive inference. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1092-y
  2. Allen C (2006) Transitive inference in animals: reasoning or conditioned associations? In: Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) Rational animals? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  3. Amé J-M, Halloy J, Rivault C, Detrain C, Deneubourg JL (2006) Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507877103
  4. Baer KL, Potter GD, Friend TH, Beaver BV (1983) Observation effects on learning in horses. Appl Anim Ethol. doi:10.1016/0304-3762(83)90121-9
  5. Baker AEM, Crawford BH (1986) Observational learning in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90017-1
  6. Berger J (1986) Wild horses of the great basin: social competition and population size. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke JV, Nicol CJ, Jones R, McGreevy PD (1996) Effects of observational learning on food selection in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(96)01071-4
  9. Dugatkin LA (2007) Developmental environment, cultural transmission, and mate choice copying. Am J Primatol. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0238-y
  10. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1993) Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behav Ecol 4:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dugatkin LA, Godin JG (1992) Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0101
  12. Feh C (1999) Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Anim Behav. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.1009
  13. Feh C (2002) Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds. Available online at http://www3.vet.upenn.edu/labs/equinebehavior/hvnwkshp/hv02/feh.htm
  14. Feist JD, McCullough DR (1976) Behavior patterns and communication in feral horses. Z Tierpsychol 41:337–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fragaszy D, Visalberghi E (1996) Primates “primacy” reconsidered. In: Heyes C, Galef BG (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, New York, pp 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galef J, Bennett G, White DJ (1998) Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 55:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godin J-GJ, Herdman EJE, Dugatkin LA (2005) Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Anim Behav 69:999–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldschmidt T, Bakker TCM, Feuth-de Bruijn E (1993) Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks. Anim Behav 45:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldschmidt-Rothschild VB, Tschanz B (1978) Soziale organisation und verhalten einer jungtierherde beim camargue-pferd. Z Tierpsychol 46:372–400Google Scholar
  20. Grosenick L, Clement TS, Fernald RD (2007) Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature05511
  21. Houpt KA, Law K, Martinisi V (1978) Dominance hierarchies in domestic horses. Appl Anim Ethol. doi:10.1016/0304-3762(78)90117-7
  22. Kraak SBM (1996) ‘Copying mate choice’: which phenomena deserve this term? Behav Process. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(95)00020-8
  23. Krueger K (2007) Behaviour of horses in the “round pen technique”. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.021
  24. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindberg AC, Kelland A, Nicol CJ (1999) Effects of observational learning on acquisition of an operant response in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00184-1
  26. McDonnell SM (2003) The equid ethogram: a practical field guide to horse behavior. Eclipse Press, Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
  27. McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (1976) Communication networks. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 409–425Google Scholar
  28. McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s100710050046
  29. Miller R, Lamb R (2005) The revolution in horsemanship: and what it means to mankind. The Lyons Press, Guilford, CTGoogle Scholar
  30. Moses SN, Villate C, Ryan JD (2006) An investigation of learning strategy supporting transitive inference performance in humans compared to other species. Neuropsychologia. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.004
  31. Murphy J, Arkins S (2007) Equine learning behaviour. Behav Process. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.06.009
  32. Nicol CJ (2002) Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00093-X
  33. Nicol CJ (2006) How animals learn from each other. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.004
  34. Nicol CJ, Pope SJ (1999) The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Anim Behav. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0920
  35. Oliveira RF, McGregor PK, Latruffe C (1998) Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0397
  36. Paz-Y-Miño CG, Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP (2004) Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature02723
  37. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  38. Rivera E, Benjamin S, Nielsen B, Shelle J, Zanella AJ (2002) Behavioral and physiological responses of horses to initial training: the comparison between pastured versus stalled horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00091-6
  39. Robert M, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2003) The structure of social knowledge in monkeys. In: de Waal T (ed) Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Sighieri C, Tedeschi D, De Andreis C, Petri L, Baragli P (2003) Behaviour patterns of horses can be used to establish a dominantsubordinate relationship between man and horse. Anim Welf 12:705–708Google Scholar
  41. Treichler FR, Van Tilburg D (1996) Concurrent conditional discrimination tests of transitive inference by macaque monkeys: list linking. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:105–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyler SJ (1972) The behaviour and social organisation of the new Forest ponies. Anim Behav Monogr 5:85–196Google Scholar
  43. White DJ (2004) Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learn Behav 32:105–113PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations