Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 553–556 | Cite as

Neophilia in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and its implication for studies of dog cognition

Short Communication

Abstract

This study examined novel-object preference in dogs. In a free choice test 17 dogs were presented with a novel toy in a line up with two familiar toys. The unfamiliar object was chosen first in 38 out 50 tests suggesting a strong preference for novel over familiar items. Neophilia may be an adaptive trait for domestic dogs that has helped their adaptation towards man.

Keywords

Dog Neophilia Novelty Preference Choice test Word learning 

References

  1. Cooper JJ, Ashton C, Bishop S, West R, Mills DS, Young RJ (2003) Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Depue RA, Collins PF (1999) Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine facilitation of incentive motivation and extraversion. Behav Brain Sci 22:491–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer J, Call J, Kaminski J (2004) A pluralistic account of word learning. TRENDS Cogn Sci 8:481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Golinkoff RM, Mervis CB, Hirsch-Pasek K (1994) Early object labels: the case of a developmental lexical principles framework. J Child Lang 21:125–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gosling SD, John OP (1999) Personality dimensions in non-human animals: a cross-species review. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping”. Science 304:1682–1684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Markman EM, Abelev M (2004) Word learning in dogs? TRENDS Cogn Sci 8:479–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition. What can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Povinelli DJ, Reaux J, Theall L, Giambrone S (2000) Folk physics for apes: the chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Sheppard G, Mills DS (2002) Development of a psychometric scale for the evaluation of the emotional predispositions of pet dogs. Int J Comp Psychol 15:201–222Google Scholar
  12. Virányi ZS, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2006) A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children. Anim Cogn 9:13–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ward C, Smuts BB (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Welfare and Ethology, Institute of Veterinary PhysiologyUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Animal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of LincolnRiseholme Park, LincolnUK

Personalised recommendations