Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 275–282 | Cite as

Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

  • Elsa Addessi
  • Lara Crescimbene
  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
Original Paper

Abstract

Quantity discrimination is adaptive in a variety of ecological contexts and different taxa discriminate stimuli differing in numerousness, both in the wild and in laboratory settings. Quantity discrimination between object arrays has been suggested to be more demanding than between food arrays but, to our knowledge, the same paradigm has never been used to directly compare them. We investigated to what extent capuchin monkeys’ relative numerousness judgments (RNJs) with food and token are alike. Tokens are inherently non-valuable objects that acquire an associative value upon exchange with the experimenter. Our aims were (1) to assess capuchins’ RNJs with food (Experiment 1) and with tokens (Experiment 2) by presenting all the possible pair-wise choices between one to five items, and (2) to evaluate on which of the two proposed non-verbal mechanisms underlying quantity discrimination (analogue magnitude and object file system) capuchins relied upon. In both conditions capuchins reliably selected the larger amount of items, although their performance was higher with food than with tokens. The influence of the ratio between arrays on performance indicates that capuchins relied on the same system for numerical representation, namely analogue magnitude, regardless of the type of stimuli (food or tokens) and across both the small and large number ranges.

Keywords

Numerousness Exchange Choice Analogue magnitude system Number 

References

  1. Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2007) Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?. Proc R Soc B 274:2709–2715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Marr MJ, Smith AD, Maple TL (2005) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old western lowland gorillas. J Comp Psychol 119:285–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson M, Kacelnik A (1996) Rate currencies and the foraging starling: the fallacy of the averages revisited. Behav Ecol 7:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beran MJ (2007) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) succeed in a test of quantity conservation. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0094-3
  8. Beran MJ, Rumbaugh DM (2001) “Constructive” enumeration by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task. Anim Cogn 4:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beran MJ, Beran MM, Harris EH, Washburn DA (2005) Ordinal judgements and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque. J Exp Psychol Anim B 31:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim B A21:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2004) A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Folia Primatol 75:317–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen MK, Lakshminarayanan V, Santos L (2006) How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin-monkey trading behavior. J Polit Econ 114:517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowles J (1937) Food-tokens as incentive for learning by chimpanzees. Comp Psychol Mon 14:1–96Google Scholar
  15. Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehane S (1997) The number sense, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Feigenson L, Carey S (2003) Tracking individuals via object files: evidence from infants’ manual search. Dev Sci 6:568–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser M (2002) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8:307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flombaum J, Junge J, Hauser M (2005) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition 97:315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (1992) Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition 44:43–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green L, Fry A, Myerson J (1994) Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychol Sci 5:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hauser M, Carey S, Hauser L (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. P Natl Acad Sci USA 267:829–833Google Scholar
  25. Hauser M, Spelke E (2004) Evolution and developmental foundations of human knowledge. In: Gazzaniga M (ed). The cognitive neuroscience, 3rd edn. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordan KE, Brannon EM (2006) Weber’s Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 9:159–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Judge PG, Evans TA, Vyas DK (2005) Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim B 31:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelleher RT (1956) Intermittent conditioned reinforcement in chimpanzees. Science 124:679–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelleher RT (1957a) A multiple schedule of conditioned reinforcement with chimpanzees. Psychol Rep 3:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelleher RT (1957b) A comparison of conditioned and food reinforcement on a fixed-ratio schedule in chimpanzees. Psychol Newslett 8:88–93Google Scholar
  31. Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim B 9:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nieder A (2005) Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence. Nat Neurosci 6:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieder A Miller EK (2003) Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nieder A, Miller EK (2004) Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: evidence for parallel processing. J Cogn Neurosci 16:889–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pylyshyn ZW (1989) The role of location indexes in spatial perception: a sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition 32:65–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D (1991) Subjective probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 55:233–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramseyer A, Pele M, Dufour V, Chauvin C, Thierry B (2006) Accepting loss: the temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys. Proc R Soc B 273:179–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richards JB, Mitchell SH, de Wit H, Seiden LS (1997) Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 67:353–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rilling M (1993) Invisible counting animals: a history of contributions from comparative psychology, ethology and learning theory. In: Boysen ST, Capaldi EJ (eds) The development of numerical competence: animal and human models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh S, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim B 13:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simon TJ (1997) Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: a “non-numerical” account. Cogn Dev 12:349–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2001) The use of tokens as rewards and tools by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 4:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevens JR, Wood JN, Hauser MD (2007) When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0081-8
  44. Tomonaga M (2007) Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0089-0
  45. Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101:80–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cogn Dev 14:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of numbers in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. vanMarle K, Aw J, McCrinck K, Santos LR (2006) How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances. J Comp Psychol 120:416–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89:B15–B25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu F, Spelke ES, Goddard S (2005) Number sense in human infants. Dev Sci 8:88–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Westergaard GC, Liv C, Chavanne TJ, Suomi SJ (1998) Token-mediated tool-use by a tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 1:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolfe J (1936) Effectiveness of token-rewards for chimpanzees. Comp Psychol Mon 12:1–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elsa Addessi
    • 1
  • Lara Crescimbene
    • 1
  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Cognitive Primatology and Primate CenterInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNRRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations