Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 75–82 | Cite as

How does dominance rank status affect individual and social learning performance in the dog (Canis familiaris)?

  • Péter Pongrácz
  • Viktória Vida
  • Petra Bánhegyi
  • Ádám Miklósi
Original Paper


Dogs can learn effectively to detour around a V-shaped fence after observing a demonstration from either an unfamiliar human or dog demonstrator. We found earlier that there is substantial individual variation between the dogs’ performance, even when using the same experimental conditions. Here, we investigate if the subjects’ relative dominance rank with other dogs had an effect on their social learning performance. On the basis of the owners’ answers to a questionnaire, subjects from multi-dog homes were sorted into groups of dominant and subordinate dogs. In Experiment 1, dominant and subordinate dogs were tested without demonstration and we did not find any difference between the groups—they had similarly low detour performances on their own. In Experiment 2 and 3, dogs from single dog and multi-dog households were tested in the detour task with demonstration by an unfamiliar dog, or human, respectively. The results showed that social learning performance of the single dogs fell between the dominant and subordinate multi-dogs with both dog and human demonstration. Subordinate dogs displayed significantly better performance after having observed a dog demonstrator in comparison to dominant dogs. In contrast, the performance of dominant and subordinate dogs was almost similar, when they observed a human demonstrator. These results suggest that perceived dominance rank in its own group has a strong effect on social learning in dogs, but this effect seems to depend also on the demonstrator species. This finding reveals an intricate organization of the social structure in multi-dog households, which can contribute to individual differences existing among dogs.


Dog Social learning Perceived rank 



This study was funded by the grants of the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) T047235 and F01031. The authors are thankful to Celeste Pongrácz for the English proofreading of this manuscript. The corresponding author assures that the experiments being reported in this paper are in accordance with the current Hungarian laws in regard to animal protection.


  1. Anderson JR, Fornasieri I, Ludes E, Roeder JJ (1992) Social processes and innovative behaviour in changing groups of Lemur fulvus. Behav Proc 27:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard CJ, Luo N (2002) Acquisition of dominance status affects maze learning in mice. Behav Proc 60:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaugrand JP, Goulet C (2000) Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav Proc 50:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjorklund DF, Yunger JL, Bering JM, Ragan P (2002) The generalization of deferred imitation in enculturated chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 5:49–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw JW, Lea AM (1989) Dyadic interactions between domestic dogs. Anthrozoös 5:245–254Google Scholar
  6. Bradshaw JW, Wickens SM (1992) Social behaviour of the domestic dog. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 117:50–53Google Scholar
  7. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens (Corvus corax): is it ‘tactical’ deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmeau R, Gallo A (1993) Social constraints determine what is learned in the chimpanzee. Behav Proc 28:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coussi-Korbel S, Fragaszy DM (1995) On the relation between social dynamics and social learning. Anim Behav 50:1441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox MW (1975) Pet–owner relations. In: Anderson RS (ed) Pet animals and society. Tindall, London, pp 37–52Google Scholar
  11. Fritz J, Bisenberger A, Kotrschal K (2000) Stimulus enhancement in greylag geese: socially mediated learning in an operant task. Anim Behav 59:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Dóka A, Csányi V (2001) Attachment behaviour of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centres: forming new bonds. J Comp Psychol 115:423–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones AC, Gosling SDG (2005) Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): a review and evaluation of past research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 95:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenks SM, Ginsburg BE (1987) Socio-sexual dynamics in a captive wolf pack. In: Frank H (ed) Man and wolf. W. Junk, Amsterdam, pp 375–399Google Scholar
  15. Kubinyi E, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117:156–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Zs, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicol CJ, Pope SJ (1999) The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Anim Behav 57:163–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saetre P, Strandberg E, Sundgren PE, Pettersson U, Jazin E, Bergström TF (2006) The genetic contribution to canine personality. Genes Brain Behav 5:240–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Gurobi K, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Anim Behav 62:1109–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Csányi V (2003a) Interaction between individual experience and social learning in dogs. Anim Behav 65:595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timár-Geng K, Csányi V (2003b) Preference for copying unambiguous demonstrations in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 117:337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timár-Geng K, Csányi V (2004) Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog and human. J Comp Psychol 118:375–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Vida V, Csányi V (2005) The pet dogs ability for learning from a human demonstrator in a detour task is independent from the breed and age. Appl Anim Behav Sci 90:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Schaik CP, Fox EA, Fechtman LT (2003) Individual variation in the rate of use of tree-hole tools among wild orangutans: implications for hominin evolution. J Human Evol 44:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schenkel R (1967) Submission: its features and functions in the wolf and dog. Am Zool 7:319–331Google Scholar
  26. Slabbert JM, Rasa OAE (1997) Observational learning of an acquired maternal behaviour pattern by working dog pups: an alternative training method? Appl Anim Behav Sci 53:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stoinski TS, Wrate JL, Ure N, Whiten A (2001) Imitative learning by captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in a simulated food processing task. J Comp Psychol 115:272–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (1997) Dog–human relationship affects problem solving ability in the dog. Anthrozoös 10:214–224Google Scholar
  30. Whiten A, Custance DA, Gomez J-C, Teixidor P, Bard KA (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter Pongrácz
    • 1
  • Viktória Vida
    • 1
  • Petra Bánhegyi
    • 1
  • Ádám Miklósi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EthologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations