Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 43–57 | Cite as

Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations

Original Paper

Abstract

Two adult chimpanzees were trained on a relative “numerosity” discrimination task. In each trial, two arrays containing different numbers of red dots were presented on a CRT monitor. The subjects were required to choose the array containing the larger number of dots. In Experiment 1, using numerosities between 1 and 8, 28 different pairs were presented repeatedly, and accuracy scores were analyzed to explore which cues the chimpanzee subjects utilized to perform the task. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the subjects’ performance was (1) not simply controlled by the “numerical” difference between arrays, but that it was (2) best described by Fechner’s Law–that is accuracy increased linearly with the logarithmic value of the numerical difference between arrays divided by the number in the larger of the two arrays. This relationship was maintained when using much larger numerosities (Experiment 3). In Experiment 2, the chimpanzees were tested on the effects of total area and density by manipulating dot size and presentation area. The results revealed that these factors clearly affected the subjects’ performance but that they could not alone explain the results, suggesting that the chimpanzees did use relative numerosity difference as a discriminative cue.

References

  1. Allik J, Tuulmets T (1991) Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Percept Psychophys 49:303–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan JD, Ashby F (1991) Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? Percept Psychophys 50:555–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beran MJ, Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1998) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) counting in a computerized testing paradigm. Psychol Rec 48:3–19Google Scholar
  4. Biro D, Matsuzawa T (2001) Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cogn 4:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 103:23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brannon EM, Terrace HS (2000) Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26:31–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brannon EM, Wusthoff CJ, Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2001) Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychol Sci 12:238–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordes S, Gelman R, Gallistel CR (2001) Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychon Bull Rev 8:698–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis H, Perusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehaene S (1992) Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44:1–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehaene S, Cohen L (1994) Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:958–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L (1998) Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci 21:355–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emmerton J (1998) Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons’ discrimination performance. Anim Learn Behav 26:243–256Google Scholar
  14. Emmerton J, Lohmann A, Niemann J (1997) Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays. Anim Learn Behav 25:234–244Google Scholar
  15. Fagot J, Tomonaga M (1999) Global-local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. J Comp Psychol 113:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser MD (2002) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files vs. analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8:307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbon J (1977) Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychol Rev 84:279–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauser MD, MacNeilage P, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:829–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser MD, Tsao F, Garcia P, Spelke ES (2003) Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representations of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270:1441–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  23. Honig WK, Stewart KE (1989) Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 17:134–146Google Scholar
  24. Jordan KE, Brannon E (2006) Weber’s law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 9:159–172. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0017-8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kilian A, Yaman S, von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis KP, Jaffe S, Brannon EM (2005) Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task. Anim Cogn 8:247–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Machado A, Keen R (2002) Relative numerosity discrimination in the pigeon: further tests of the linear-exponential-ratio model. Behav Process 57:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuzawa T (1985) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature 315:57–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsuzawa T (2003) The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts. Anim Cogn 6:199–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsuzawa T, Inoue S, Biro D (2005) Concept of number: comparison between humans and chimpanzees. Paper presented at the 65th annual meeting of the Japanese animal psychology, October 2005. Chiba, JapanGoogle Scholar
  32. Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 9:320–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murofushi K (1997) Numerical matching behavior by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): subitizing and analogue magnitude estimation. Jpn Psychol Res 39:140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nieder A (2005) Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:177–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nieder A, Miller EK (2003) Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 34:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nieder A, Miller EK (2004a) Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: evidence for parallel processing. J Cogn Neurosci 16:889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieder A, Miller EK (2004b) A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:7457–7462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pepperberg IM (1987) Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African grey parrot: labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75:37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinel P, Piazza M, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S (2004) Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron 41:983–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh S, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:107–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Pate JL (1988) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): addendum. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:118–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shumaker RW, Palkovich AM, Beck BB, Guagnano GA, Morowitz H (2001) Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 115:385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simon TJ, Vaishnavi S (1996) Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. Percept Psychophys 58:915–926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Starkey P, Cooper RG (1980) Perception of numbers by human infants. Science 210:1033–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suzuki K, Kobayashi T (2000) Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis and Bradford (1986) extended. J Comp Psychol 114:73–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanaka M (2003) Visual preference by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photos of primates measured by a free choice-order task: implication for influence of social experience. Primates 44:157–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tomonaga M (1997) Precuing the target location in visual searching by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): effects of precue validity. Jpn Psychol Res 39:200–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tomonaga M (1998) Perception of shape from shading in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn 1:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomonaga M (1999) Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates 40:417–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomonaga M (2001) Investigating visual perception and cognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) through visual search and related tasks: from basic to complex processes. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origin of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Tokyo, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  51. Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T (2002) Enumeration of briefly presented items by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Anim Learn Behav 30:143–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Treiber F, Wilcox S (1984) Discrimination of number by infants. Infant Behav Dev 7:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12:97–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW (1993) What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:331–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trick L, Pylyshyn ZW (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101:80–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cogn Dev 14:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uller C, Hauser M, Carey S (2001) Spontaneous representation of number in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:248–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Oeffelen MP, Vos PG (1982) A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Percept Psychophys 32:163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vos PG, Van Oeffelen MP, Tibosch HJ, Allik J (1988) Interactions between area and numerosity. Psychol Res 50:148–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89:B15–B25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Watanabe S (1998) Discrimination of “four” and “two” by pigeons. Psychol Rec 48:383–391Google Scholar
  64. Watson DG, Maylor EA, Manson NJ (2002) Aging and enumeration: a selective deficit for the subitization of targets among distractors. Psychol Aging 17:496–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson DG, Maylor EA, Bruce LAM (2005) The efficiency of feature-based subitization and counting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1449–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61:203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wynn K (1998) Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants. Trends Cogn Sci 2:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Language and Intelligence, Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityInuyama, AichiJapan

Personalised recommendations