Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember?
- First Online:
Metacognition refers to the ability to monitor and control one’s own cognitive activities such as memory. Although recent studies have raised an interesting possibility that some species of nonhuman animals might possess such skills, subjects often required a numerous number of training trials to acquire the effective use of metacognitive responses. Here, five orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) were tested whether they were able to escape spatial memory tests when they did not remember the location of preferred reward in a relatively small number of trials. The apes were presented with two identical cups, under one of which the experimenter hid a preferred reward (e.g., two grapes). The subjects were then presented with a third container, “escape response”, with which they could receive a less preferred but secure reward (e.g., one grape). The orangutans as a group significantly more likely selected the escape response when the baiting of the preferred reward was invisible (as compared to when it was visible) and when the hiding locations of the preferred reward were switched (as compared to when they remained unchanged). Even when the escape response was presented before the final presentation of the memory test, one orangutan successfully avoided the test in which she would likely err. These findings indicate that some orangutans appear to tell when they do not remember correct answers in memory tests.
KeywordsMetacognition Orangutans Escape response
- Call (2001) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:159–171Google Scholar
- Call (2003) Spatial rotations and transpositions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates 44:347–357Google Scholar
- Call J (2005) The self and other: a missing link in comparative social cognition. In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 321–341Google Scholar
- Nelson TO, Narens L (1990) Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 26. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–141Google Scholar
- Nelson TO, Narens L (1994) Why investigate metacognition? In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP (eds) Metacognition: knowing about knowing. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–25Google Scholar
- Sabiaul F, Romansky K, Cantlon JF, Klein T, Terrace H (in press) Cognitive imitation in 2-year-old human children (Homo sapience): a comparison with rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0070-3Google Scholar
- Shumaker RW and Swartz KB (2004) Cognition: mirror self-recognition. In: Bekoff M (ed) Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Vol. 1, A-C. Greenwood Press, Westport CT London, pp 308–312Google Scholar
- Smith JD, Shields WE, Washburn DA (2003b) Inaugurating a new area of comparative cognition research. Behav Brain Sci 26:358–373Google Scholar
- Son LK, Kornell N (2005) Metaconfidence judgments in rhesus macaques: explicit versus implicit mechanisms. In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 296–320Google Scholar
- Swartz KB, Himmanen SA (2006) Individual response strategies in list learning by orangutans. Int J Psychol Psychol Therapy 6:233–248Google Scholar