Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 429–437 | Cite as

When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

  • Jeffrey R. Stevens
  • Justin N. Wood
  • Marc D. Hauser
Original Paper

Abstract

The capacity for non-linguistic, numerical discrimination has been well characterized in non-human animals, with recent studies providing careful controls for non-numerical confounds such as continuous extent, density, and quantity. More poorly understood are the conditions under which animals use numerical versus non-numerical quantification, and the nature of the relation between these two systems. Here we test whether cotton-top tamarins and common marmosets can discriminate between two quantities on the basis of the amount of food rather than on number. In three experiments, we show that when choosing between arrays containing different numbers and sizes of food objects, both species based their decisions on the amount of food with only minor influences of numerical information. Further, we find that subjects successfully discriminated between two quantities differing by a 2:3 or greater ratio, which is consistent with the ratio limits found for numerical discrimination with this species. These studies demonstrate that non-human primates possess mechanisms that enable quantification of total amount, in addition to the numerical representations demonstrated in previous studies, with both types of quantification subject to similar processing limits.

Keywords

Analog magnitude Callitrichids Foraging Non-linguistic quantification Numerical discrimination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank NIH (NRSA) for funding J.R.S., Harvard University and NIH (NRSA) for funding J.N.W., and NSF (ROLE) for funding M.D.H. We would also like to thank David Glynn, Ian Goh, Sarah Heilbronner, Jeff Lau, Cori McLean, Alex Rosati, and Amy Tao for assistance in conducting this experiment. We are grateful to three anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript. This experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Harvard University (Animal Subjects Codes 92–16 and 22–07) and conforms to the APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Awazu S, Fujita K (2004) Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) choose smaller food arrays: long-term retention, choice with nonpreferred food, and transposition. J Comp Psychol 118:58–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Marr MJ, Smith AD, Maple TL (2005) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western lowland gorillas. J Comp Psychol 119:285–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth H (2003) Discrete and continuous cues to quantity in large sets of food items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth H, Kanwisher N, Spelke ES (2003) The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition 86:201–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beran MJ, Beran MM (2004) Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychol Sci 15:94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 103:23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psych Anim B 21:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boysen ST, Capaldi EJ (1993) The development of numerical competence: animal and human models. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  11. Boysen ST, Hallberg KI (2000) Primate numerical competence: contributions toward understanding nonhuman cognition. Cog Sci 24:423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brannon EM (2005a) The numerical ability of animals. In: Campbell JID (eds) Handbook of mathematical cognition. Psychology Press, New York, pp 85–108Google Scholar
  13. Brannon EM (2005b) Quantitative thinking: from monkey to human and human infant to adult. In: Dehaene S, Duhamel J-R, Hauser MD, Rizzolatti G (eds) From monkey brain to human brain. MIT, Cambridge, pp 97–116Google Scholar
  14. Brannon EM, Abbott S, Lutz DJ (2004) Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy. Cognition 93:B59–B68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brannon EM, Terrace HS (1998) Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science 282:746–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brannon EM, Terrace HS (2002) The evolution and ontogeny of ordinal numerical ability. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt GM (eds) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp 197–204Google Scholar
  17. Breukelaar JW, Dalrymple-Alford JC (1998) Timing ability and numerical competence in rats. J Exp Psych Anim B 24:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2006) Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychol Sci 17:401–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis H, Memmott J (1982) Counting behavior in animals: a critical evaluation. Psychol Bull 92:547–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis H, Perusse R (1988) Numerical competence: from backwater to mainstream of comparative psychology. Behav Brain Sci 8:47–68Google Scholar
  22. Dehaene S (1997) The number sense. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser MD (2002) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke ES (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cog Sci 8:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:829–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hauser MD, Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Patalano A (2002) Spontaneous number discrimination of multi-format auditory stimuli in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Cognition 86:B23–B32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hauser MD, MacNeilage P, Ware M (1996) Numerical representation in primates. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 93:1514–1517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hauser MD, Spelke ES (2004) Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences III. MIT, Cambridge, pp 853–864Google Scholar
  31. Hauser MD, Tsao F, Garcia P, Spelke ES (2003) Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1441–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitchen DM (2004) Alpha male black howler monkey responses to loud calls: effect of numeric odds, male companion behaviour and reproductive investment. Anim Behav 67:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis KP, Jaffe S, Brannon EM (2005) Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task. Anim Cog 8:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390:279–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsuzawa T (1985) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature 315:57–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McComb K, Packer C, Pusey AE (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meck WD, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psych Anim B 9:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Menzel EW (1960) Selection of food by size in the chimpanzee, and comparison with human judgments. Science 131:1527–1528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menzel EW (1961) Perception of food size in chimpanzee. J Comp Physiol Psych 54:588–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Menzel EW (1969) Responsiveness to food and signs of food in chimpanzee discrimination learning. J Comp Physiol Psych 68:484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pylyshyn ZW, Storm RW (1988) Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat Vis 3:179–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh S, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psych Anim B 13:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santos LR, Barnes JL, Mahajan N (2005) Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra). Anim Cog 8:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shumaker RW, Palkovich AM, Beck BB, Guagnano GA, Morowitz H (2001) Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 115:385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  47. Stevens JR, Hallinan EV, Hauser MD (2005a) The ecology and evolution of patience in two New World monkeys. Biol Lett 1:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stevens JR, Rosati AG, Ross KR, Hauser MD (2005b) Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two New World primates. Curr Biol 15:1855–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas RK, Chase L (1980) Relative numerousness judgments by squirrel monkeys. Bull Psychon Soc 16:79–82Google Scholar
  50. Uller C, Hauser MD, Carey S (2001) Spontaneous representation of number in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:248–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cog 6:105–112Google Scholar
  52. vanMarle K, Wynn K (2006) 6–month-old infants use analog magnitudes to represent duration. Dev Sci 9:F41–F49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Washburn DA, Rumbaugh DM (1991) Ordinal judgments of numerical symbols by macaques (Macaca mulatta). Psychol Sci 2:190–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61:1203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood JN, Hauser MD, Glynn DD, Barner D (2007) Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of nonsolid portions. Cognition (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey R. Stevens
    • 1
    • 4
  • Justin N. Wood
    • 1
  • Marc D. Hauser
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Cognitive Evolution Laboratory, Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Organismic & Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological AnthropologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  4. 4.Center for Adaptive Behavior and CognitionMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations