Animal Cognition

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 243–258 | Cite as

Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius)

Original Paper

Abstract

Object permanence in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) was investigated using a complete version of the Uzgiris and Hunt scale 1. Nine hand-raised jays were studied, divided into two groups according to their different developmental stages (experiment 1, older jays: 2–3 months old, n = 4; experiment 2, younger jays: 15 days old, n = 5). In the first experiment, we investigated whether older jays could achieve piagetian stage 6 of object permanence. Tasks were administered in a fixed sequence (1–15) according to the protocols used in other avian species. The aim of the second experiment was to check whether testing very young jays before their development of “neophobia” could influence the achievement times of piagetian stages. Furthermore, in this experiment tasks were administered randomly to investigate whether the jays’ achievement of stage 6 follows a fixed sequence related to the development of specific cognitive abilities. All jays tested in experiments 1 and 2 fully achieved piagetian stage 6 and no “A not B” errors were observed. Performance on visible displacement tasks was better than performance on invisible ones. The results of experiment 2 show that “neophobia” affected the response of jays in terms of achievement times; the older jays in experiment 1 took longer to pass all the tasks when compared with the younger, less neophobic, jays in experiment 2. With regard to the achieving order, jays followed a fixed sequence of acquisition in experiment 2, even if tasks were administered randomly, with the exception of one subject. The results of these experiments support the idea that piagetian stages of cognitive development exist in avian species and that they progress through relatively fixed sequences.

Keywords

Object permanence Piaget Bird Corvid Jay 

Supplementary material

Experiment 2, younger jays, task 5—search for simply hidden objects, two sites, visible.

Experiment 1, older jays, task 9—search following an invisible displacement, superimposed covers. Birds tried to reach the object as soon as possible by removing more than one screen at the same time. The displacement of the covers was improved using adhesive tape to fix the first and smallest cover onto the bottom of the “cake box”.

Experiment 1, older jays, task 13, search following an invisible displacement, complex complete hiding, invisible.

Experiment 1, older jays, task 14, search following successive invisible displacement, three sites, invisible. The object was visibly placed in the palm of the experimenter’s hand, which was then closed. The hand passed behind two screens (closed) and the object was placed behind the last screen. Then, the experimenter showed his empty hand to the bird.

Experiment 1, older jays, task 15, search following successive invisible displacement. One mealworm was already hidden under the first screen (left side) before beginning the test. Then, a second mealworm was visibly placed in the palm of the experimenter’s hand, which was then closed. The hand passed behind two screens (closed) but the second object was placed inside a glove that the experimenter was wearing on his hand without being seen by the bird. The bird was led to believe that the mealworm was under the third screen (right side). Successful criterion: the jay searched systematically in reverse order, i.e. final screen, second screen and first screen.

Experiment 2, younger jays, Shell game. The experimenter visibly hides an object behind one screen and then the position of the screen is visibly exchanged with one of the other two screens.

References

  1. Birkhead TR (1991) The magpies: the ecology and behaviour of black-billed and yellow magpies. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP (2003) Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Anim Behav 65:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossema I (1979) Jays and Oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour 70:1–17Google Scholar
  4. Bugnyar T, Heinrich B (2006) Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors. Anim Cogn 9:369–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: is it “tactical” deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Call J (2001) Object permanence in orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:159–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Anim Cogn 5:71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2004) New Caledonian crows manufacture tools with a suitable diameter for a novel task. Anim Cogn 7:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chettleburgh MR (1952) Observation on the collection and burial of acorns by Jays in Hainault forest. Br Birds 45:359–364Google Scholar
  10. Chevalier-Skolnikoff S (1989) Spontaneous tool use and sensori-motor intelligence in Cebus compared with other monkeys and apes. Behav Brain Sci 12:561–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) One-trial associative memory: comparison of food-storing and non-storing species of birds. Anim Learn Behav 22:366–372Google Scholar
  12. Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998). Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1995) Memory in food-storing birds: from behaviour to brain. Curr Biol 5:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton NS, Mellor R, Jackson A (1996) Seasonal patterns of food storing in the European jay (Garrulus glandarius) Ibis 138:250–255Google Scholar
  15. Clayton NS, Bussey T J, Dickinson A (2003) Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nat Rev Neurosci 4:685–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clayton NS, Dally JM, Gilbert JDJ, Dickinson A (2005). Food caching by Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica): a case of prospective cognition. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav] 31:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Blois ST, Novak MA, Bond M (1998) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Psychol 112:137–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doré FY, Dumas C (1987) Psychology of animal cognition: piagetian studies. Psychol Bull 102:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doré FY, Fiset S, Goulet S, Dumas M-C, Gagnon S (1996) Search behavior in cats and dogs: interspecific differences in working memory and spatial cognition. Anim Learn Behav 24:142–149Google Scholar
  20. Dumas C (1992) Object permanence in cats (Felis catus): an ecological approach to the study of invisible displacements. J Comp Psychol 106:404–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dumas C, Doré FY (1989) Cognitive development in kittens (Felis catus): a cross-sectional study of object permanence. J Comp Psychol 103:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dumas C, Wilkie DM (1995) Object permanence in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). J Comp Psychol 109:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emery NJ (2004) Are corvids ‘feathered apes’? Cognitive evolution in crows, jays, rooks and jackdaws. In: Watanabe S (ed) Comparative analysis of minds. Keio University Press, Tokyo, pp 181–213Google Scholar
  24. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004a) Comparing the complex cognition of Birds and Primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Comparative vertebrate cognition: are primates superior to non-primates? Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 3–46Google Scholar
  25. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004b) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvid and apes. Science 306:1903–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Etienne AS (1973) Searching behaviour towards a disappearing prey in the domestic chick as affected by preliminary experience. Anim Behav 21:749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Etienne AS (1984) The meaning of object permanence at different zoological levels. Hum Dev 27:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Funk MS (1996) Development of object permanence in the New Zealand parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim Learn Behav 21:749–761Google Scholar
  29. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1992) Search behaviour in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues. J Comp Psychol 106:58–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1993) Search behaviour of dogs (Canis familiaris) in invisible displacement problems. Anim Learn Behav 21:246–254Google Scholar
  31. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1994) A cross-sectional study of object permanence in domestic puppies (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 108:220–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goulet S, Doré FY, Rousseau R (1994) Object permanence and working memory in cats (Felis catus). J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav] 20:347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenberg R (1990) Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Anim Behav 39:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hampton RR, Shettleworth SJ (1996) Hippocampus and memory in a food storing and in a nonstoring bird species. Behav Neurosci 110:946–964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hauser MD (2001) Searching for food in the wild: a nonhuman primate’s expectations about invisible displacement. Dev Sci 4:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hauser MD, Williams T, Kralik JD, Moskovitz D (2001) What guides a search for food that has disappeared? Experiments on cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:140–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heinrich B (1988) Why do ravens fear their food? Condor 90:950–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heinrich B (1995) Neophilia and exploration in juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 50:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heinrich B (1999) Mind of the raven. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Heinrich B, Pepper JW (1998) Influence of competitors on caching behavior in the common raven. Anim Behav 56:1083–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heinrich B, Marzluff JM, Adams W (1995) Fear and food recognition in naive common ravens. Auk 112: 499–503Google Scholar
  42. Hunt GR (1996) Manufacture and use of hook tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt GR, Rutledge RB, Gray RD (2006) The right tool for the job: what strategies do wild New Caledonians crows use? Anim Cogn 9:307–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jarvis ED, Güntürkün O, Bruce L, Csillag A, Karten H, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Perkel DJ, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild JM, Ball GF, Dugas-Ford J, Durand SE, Hough GE, Husband S, Kubikova L, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, Siang C, Smulders TV, Wada K, White SA, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Reiner A, Butler AV (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate evolution. The Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:151–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaplan G, Rogers LJ (2001) Birds: their habits and skills. Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  46. Keve A (1995) Der Eichelhäher: Garrulus glandarius. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  47. King AS, McLelland J (1984) Birds: their structure and function. Bailliere Tindall, London, pp 310–311Google Scholar
  48. Madge S, Burn H (1999) Crows and jays—a guide to the crows, jays and magpies of the World. Christopher Helm, London, pp 95–97Google Scholar
  49. Mathieu M, Bouchard MA, Granger L, Herscovitch J (1976) Piagetian object permanence in Cebus capucinus, Lagothrica flavicauda, and Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 24:585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Minahan MF, Beran MJ, Savage-Rumbaugh ES (2000) Object permanence in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Primatol 51:75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Natale F, Antinucci F, Spinozzi G, Potì P (1986) Stage 6 object concept in nonhuman primate cognition: a comparison between gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). J Comp Psychol 100:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neiworth JJ, Steinmark E, Basile BM, Wonders R, Steely F, DeHart C (2003) A test of object permanence in a new-world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 6:27–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pepperberg IM (2002) The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies. Anim Cogn 5:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pepperberg IM, Funk MS (1990) Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus) and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus). Anim Learn Behav 18:97–108Google Scholar
  55. Pepperberg IM, Kozak FA (1986) Object permanence in the African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Learn Behav 14:322–330Google Scholar
  56. Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravitz LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piaget J (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press, New York (Original work published in 1936)Google Scholar
  58. Piaget J (1954) The construction of reality in the Child. International Universities Press, New York (Original work published in 1937)Google Scholar
  59. Plowright CMS, Reid S, Kilian T (1998) Finding hidden food: behaviour on visible displacements tasks by Mynahs (Gracula religiosa) and Pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol 112:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pollok B, Helmut P, Güntürkün O (2000) Development of object permanence in food-storing magpies (Pica pica). J Comp Psychol 114:148–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Redshaw M (1978) Cognitive development in human and gorilla infants. J Hum Evol 7:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1994a) Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks. Anim Behav 49:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1994b). Perceptual and motivational aspects of detour behaviour in young chicks. Anim Behav 47:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1995) Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Anim Behav 50:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reiner A, Perkel DJ, Bruce LL, Butler AB, Csillag AS, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Shimitzu T, Striedter G, Wild M, Ball GF, Durand S, Güntürkün O, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, White SA, Hough G, Kubikova L, Smulders TV, Wada K, Dugas-Ford J, Husband S, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Siang C, Jarvis ED (2004) Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473:377–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rogers LJ (1997) Minds of their own. Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  67. Savage C (1995) Bird brains: The intelligence of crows, ravens, magpies and jays. Sierra Club Book, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  68. Shettleworth SJ (1995) Comparative studies of memory in food storing birds: from the field to the Skinner box. In: Alleva E, Fasolo A, Lipp HP, Nadel L and Ricceri L (eds) Behavioural brain research in naturalistic and semi-naturalistic settings. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 159–192Google Scholar
  69. Seyfart RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28:1070–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sophian C (1985) Understanding the movement of objects: early developments in spatial cognition. Br J Dev Psychol 3:321–333Google Scholar
  71. Thinus-Blanc C, Scardigli P (1981) Object permanence in the Golden Hamster. Percept Mot Skills 53:1010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Triana E, Pasnak R (1981) Object permanence in cats and dogs. Anim Learn Behav 9:135–139Google Scholar
  74. Uzgiris IC, Hunt J (1975) Assessment in infancy: ordinal scales of psychological development. University of Illinois Press, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  75. Vallortigara G (2004) Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Vertebrate comparative cognition: are primates superior to non-primates? Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 57–94Google Scholar
  76. Vallortigara G (2006) The cognitive chicken: visual and spatial cognition in a non-mammalian brain. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 41–58Google Scholar
  77. Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Rigoni M, Zanforlin M (1998). Delayed search for a concealed imprinted object in the domestic chick. Anim Cogn 1:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vauclair J (1996) Animal cognition: an introduction to modern comparative psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  79. Weir AAS, Kacelnik A (2006) A new Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tolls by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Anim Cogn 9:317–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilmore SB (1977) Crows, jays, ravens and their relatives. David and Charles, London, pp 22–54Google Scholar
  81. Wynne CDL (2001) Other ways of seeing the world—II: abstract dimensions. In: Wynne CDL (ed) Animal cognition, the mental lives of animals. Palgrave, Norfolk, UK, pp 82–87Google Scholar
  82. Wood S, Moriarty KM, Gardner BT, Gardner RA (1980) Object permanence in child and chimpanzee. Anim Learn Behav 8:3–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Zucca
    • 1
  • Nadia Milos
    • 1
  • Giorgio Vallortigara
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLaboratory of Animal Cognition and Comparative NeuroscienceTriesteItaly
  2. 2.B.R.A.I.N. Centre for NeuroscienceUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations