Animal Cognition

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 295–305 | Cite as

Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model

Review

Abstract

The ability to act on information flexibly is one of the cornerstones of intelligent behavior. As particularly informative example, tool-oriented behavior has been investigated to determine to which extent nonhuman animals understand means–end relations, object affordances, and have specific motor skills. Even planning with foresight, goal-directed problem solving and immediate causal inference have been a focus of research. However, these cognitive abilities may not be restricted to tool-using animals but may be found also in animals that show high levels of curiosity, object exploration and manipulation, and extractive foraging behavior. The kea, a New Zealand parrot, is a particularly good example. We here review findings from laboratory experiments and field observations of keas revealing surprising cognitive capacities in the physical domain. In an experiment with captive keas, the success rate of individuals that were allowed to observe a trained conspecific was significantly higher than that of naive control subjects due to their acquisition of some functional understanding of the task through observation. In a further experiment using the string-pulling task, a well-probed test for means–end comprehension, we found the keas finding an immediate solution that could not be improved upon in nine further trials. We interpreted their performance as insightful in the sense of being sensitive of the relevant functional properties of the task and thereby producing a new adaptive response without trial-and-error learning. Together, these findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the distribution of higher cognitive skills in the animal kingdom by showing high levels of sensorimotor intelligence in animals that do not use tools. In conclusion, we suggest that the ‘Technical intelligence hypothesis’ (Byrne, Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations, pp 289–211, 1997), which has been proposed to explain the origin of the ape/monkey grade-shift in intelligence by a selection pressure upon an increased efficiency in foraging behavior, should be extended, that is, applied to some birds as well.

Keywords

Technical intelligence Sensorimotor Development Social learning Causal reasoning Insight 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the assistance and support of the Department of Conservation of New Zealand. Financial support came from the Austrian Science Fund (BIO P15027). We thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

References

  1. Antinucci F (1989) Systematic comparison of early sensorimotor development. In: Antinucci F (ed) Cognitive structure and development in nonhuman primates. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hilldsale, NJ, pp 67–85Google Scholar
  2. Beck BB (1980) Animal tool behavior. Garland Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugnyar T, Heinrich B (2006) Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors. Anim Cogn DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0035-6Google Scholar
  4. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: is it tactical deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne RW (1997) The technical intelligence hypothesis: an additional evolutionary stimulus to intelligence? In: Whiten A, Byrne RW (eds) Machiavellian intelligence. vol II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–211Google Scholar
  6. Byrne RW (1998) Comment on Boesch and Tomasello's “chimpanzee and human cultures”. Curr Anthropol 39:604–605Google Scholar
  7. Byrne RW, Whiten A (1988) Machiavellian intelligence. Social expertise and the evolution of the intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Call J, Tomasello M (1996) The effect of humans on the cognitive development of apes. In: Russon AE, Bard KA, Parker ST (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of the great apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 371–403Google Scholar
  9. Chevalier-Skolnikoff S (1989) Spontaneous tool use and sensorimotor intelligence in Cebus compared with other monkeys and apes. Behav Brain Sci 12:561–588Google Scholar
  10. Clayton DA (1978) Socially facilitated behavior. Q Rev Biol 53:373–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond J, Bond AB (1999) Kea, bird of paradox. The evolution and behavior of a New Zealand parrot. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Doré FY, Dumas C (1987) Psychology of animal cognition: Piagetian studies. Psychol Bull 102:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dücker G, Rensch B (1977) The solution of patterned string problems by birds. Behavior 62:164–173Google Scholar
  14. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306:1903–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Funk MS (2002) Problem solving skills in young yellow-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim Cogn 5:167–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gajdon G, Fijn N, Huber L (2004) Testing social learning in a wild mountain parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Learn Behav 32:62–71Google Scholar
  17. Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L (2006) Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Anim Cogn 9:173–181. DOI: 10.1007/s10071–006-0018–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauser MD (1997) Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language. Cognition 64:285–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauser MD (2000) Wild minds: what animals really think. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinrich B (1995) An experimental investigation of insight in common ravens (Corvus corax). Auk 112:994–1003Google Scholar
  21. Heinrich B (2000) Testing insight in ravens. In: Heyes C, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 289–305Google Scholar
  22. Heinrich B, Bugnyar T (2005) Testing problem solving in ravens: string-pulling to reach food. Ethology 111: 962–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heyes CM (1998) Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behav Brain Sci 21:101–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hood BM, Hauser MD, Anderson L, Santos L (1999) Gravity biases in a non-human primate? Dev Sci 2:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber L (1998) Movement imitation as faithful copying in the absence of insight. Behav Brain Sci 22:694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huber L (in press) Emulation learning: the integration of technical and social cognition. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL (eds) Models and mechanisms of imitation and social learning in robots, humans and animals: behavioural, social and communicative dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber L, Rechberger S, Taborsky M (2001) Social learning affects object exploration and manipulation in keas, Nestor notabilis. Anim Behav 62:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Humphrey NK (1976) The social function of intellect. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 303–317Google Scholar
  29. Hunt GR, Rutledge RB, Gray RD (2006) The right tool for the job: what strategy do wild New Caledonian crows use? Anim Cogn DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0047-2Google Scholar
  30. Iwaniuk AN, Dean KM, Nelson JE (2005) Interspecific allometry of the brain and brain regions in parrots (Psittaciformes): comparisons with other birds and primates. Brain Behav Evol 65:40–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnston R (1999) The kea (Nestor notabilis): A New Zealand problem or problem solver? Doctoral thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  32. Jolly A (1966) Lemur social behavior and primate intelligence. Science 153:501–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Köhler W (1921) The mentality of apes. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Kummer H (1995) Causal knowledge in animals. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 26–39Google Scholar
  35. Lefebvre L (2000) Feeding innovations and their cultural transmission in bird populations. In: Heyes CM, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D (2004) Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain Behav Evol 63:233–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marler P (1996) Are primates smarter than birds? Curr Ornithol 13:1–32Google Scholar
  38. Mendes N, Huber L (2004) Object permanence in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). J Comp Psychol 118:103–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osthaus B, Lea SEG, Slater AM (2005) Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 8: 37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker ST, Gibson KR (1977) Object manipulation, tool use, and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. J Hum Evol 6:623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parker ST, McKinney ML (1999) Origins of intelligence. The evolution of cognitive development in monkeys, apes, and humans. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Pepperberg IM (2002) The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies. Anim Cogn 5:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pepperberg IM (2004) “Insightful” string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266Google Scholar
  45. Pepperberg IM (2006) Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7Google Scholar
  46. Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravitz LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piaget J (1936) La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Neuenburg, ParisGoogle Scholar
  48. Povinelli DJ (2000) Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Rumbaugh DM, Beran MJ, Hillix WA (2000) Cause-effect reasoning in humans and animals. In: Heyes C, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 221–238Google Scholar
  50. Santos L, Ericson BN, Hauser MD (1999) Constraints on problem solving and inhibition: object retrieval in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 113:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seibt U, Wickler W (2006) Individuality in problem solving: string pulling in two carduelis species (Aves: passeriformes). Ethology 112:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spelke E, Breinlinger K, Macomber J, Jacobson K (1992) Origins of knowledge. Psychol Rev 99:605–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (1995) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Tebbich S, Taborsky M, Winkler H (1996) Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas. Anim Behav 52:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. The Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:151–159Google Scholar
  56. Thorpe WH (1956) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomasello M (1996) Do apes ape? In: Galef B, Heyes C (eds) Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 319–346Google Scholar
  58. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Tomasello M, Davis-Dasilva M, Camak L, Bard K (1987) Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Hum Evol 2:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tomasello M, Kruger AC, Ratner HH (1993) Cultural learning. Behav Brain Sci 16:495–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vauclair J (1996) Animal cognition: an introduction to modern comparative psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Vince MA (1961) “String-pulling” in birds. III: The successful response in greenfinches and canaries. Behavior 17:103–129Google Scholar
  63. Visalberghi E, Tomasello M (1998) Primate causal understanding in the physical and psychological domains. Behav Process 42:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Voelkl B, Huber L (2000) True imitation in marmosets. Anim Behav 60:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Want SC, Harris PL (2002) How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non-human primates to the developmental study of ‘imitation’ in children. Dev Sci 5:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watanabe S, Huber L (2006) Animal logics: decisions in the absence of human language. Anim Cogn DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0043-6Google Scholar
  67. Weir AAS, Kacelnik A (2006) New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-design tools by bending or unbending metal strips according to needs. Anim Cogn DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0052-5Google Scholar
  68. Weir AS, Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297:981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Werdenich D, Huber L (2006) A case of quick problem solving in birds: string-pulling in keas (Nestor notabilis). Anim Behav 71:855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whiten A, Custance DM, Gomez J-C, Teixidor P, Bard KA (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whiten A, Horner V, Litchfield CA, Marshall-Pescini S (2004) How do apes ape? Learn Behav 32:36–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Willatts P (1999) Development of means-end behavior in young infants: pulling a support to retrieve a distant object. Dev Psychol 35:651–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for BehaviorNeurobiology and Cognition, University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Konrad Lorenz Institute for EthologyAustrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations