Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice
We tested whether dogs have a cross-modal representation of human individuals. We presented domestic dogs with a photo of either the owner's or a stranger's face on the LCD monitor after playing back a voice of one of those persons. A voice and a face matched in half of the trials (Congruent condition) and mismatched in the other half (Incongruent condition). If our subjects activate visual images of the voice, their expectation would be contradicted in Incongruent condition. It would result in the subjects’ longer looking times in Incongruent condition than in Congruent condition. Our subject dogs looked longer at the visual stimulus in Incongruent condition than in Congruent condition. This suggests that dogs actively generate their internal representation of the owner's face when they hear the owner calling them. This is the first demonstration that nonhuman animals do not merely associate auditory and visual stimuli but also actively generate a visual image from auditory information. Furthermore, our subject also looked at the visual stimulus longer in Incongruent condition in which the owner's face followed an unfamiliar person's voice than in Congruent condition in which the owner's face followed the owner's voice. Generating a particular visual image in response to an unfamiliar voice should be difficult, and any expected images from the voice ought to be more obscure or less well defined than that of the owners. However, our subjects looked longer at the owner's face in Incongruent condition than in Congruent condition. This may indicate that dogs may have predicted that it should not be the owner when they heard the unfamiliar person's voice.
KeywordsCross-modal representation Natural concepts Dogs
We wish to thank all the owners of the dogs who volunteered to participate in our experiments. This study was supported by the Research Fellowships of the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Young Scientists to Ikuma Adachi and Hiroko Kuwahata, the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Nos. 13410026, 14651020, and 17300085 from JSPS to Kazuo Fujita, and by the 21st Century COE Program, D-10, from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan, to Kyoto University. We also thank James R. Anderson for his editing of the manuscript.
- Aydin A, Pearce JM (1994) Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. J Exp Psychol ABP 20:264–277Google Scholar
- Cook RG, Wright AA, Kendrick DF (1990) Visual categorization by pigeons. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn SM, Munford DB (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior, vol 8. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp 187–214Google Scholar
- Evans TA, Howell S, Westergaard GC (2005) Auditory-visual cross-modal preception of communicative stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol ABP 31:399–406Google Scholar
- Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol ABP 2:285–302Google Scholar
- Lea SEG, Ryan CME (1993) Featural analysis of pigeons’ acquisition of discrimination between letters. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analyses of behavior, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp 239–253Google Scholar
- Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1992) Meaning and mind in monkeys. Sci Am 78–84Google Scholar