Animal Cognition

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 173–181

Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis)

Original Article

Abstract

In the local population of kea in Mount Cook Village, New Zealand, some keas open the lids of rubbish bins with their bill to obtain food scraps within. We investigated the extent to which this innovation has spread in the local population, and what factors limit the acquisition of bin opening. Only five males of 36 individually recognised birds were observed to have performed successful bin opening. With one exception there were always other keas present, watching successful bin opening. Seventeen additional individuals were seen to have benefitted from lid opening. Their foraging success was less than that of the bin openers. Social status of bin openers did not differ from scrounging males. Among the individuals that were regularly seen at the site of the bins but were not successful in bin opening, social status and the ratio of feeding directly from open bins correlated with the amount of opening attempts. We conclude that scrounging facilitated certain behavioural aspects of bin opening rather than inhibiting them. The fact that only 9% of opening attempts were successful, and the long period of time required to increase efficiency in lid opening shows that mainly individual experience, and to a lesser extent insight and social learning, play key roles in acquisition of the opening technique. The results indicate that the spread of innovative solutions of challenging mechanical problems in animals may be restricted to only a few individuals.

Keywords

Innovation Physical cognition Social learning Scrounging 

References

  1. Barnard CJ, Sibly RM (1981) Producer and scroungers: a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Anim Behav 29:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beggs W, Mankelow S (2002) Kea (Nestor notabilis) make meals of mice (Mus musculus). Notornis 49, 50Google Scholar
  3. Bond AB, Wilson KJ, Diamond J (1991) Sexual dimorphism in the kea (Nestor notabilis). Emu 91:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell CA, Whiten A (2003) Scrounging facilitates social learning in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Anim Behav 65:1085–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guiness FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav 27:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond J, Bond AB (1991) Social behavior and the ontogeny of foraging in the kea (Nestor notabilis). Ethology 88:128–144Google Scholar
  7. Diamond J, Bond AB (1999) Kea, bird of paradox: the evolution and behavior of a New Zealand parrot. University of California Press, Berkley, Los Angeles, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond J, Bond AB (2004) Social play in kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with comparison to kea (Nestor notabilis). Behaviour 141:777–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fritz J, Kotrschal K (1999) Social learning in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 57:785–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Funk MS (1996) Spatial skill development in Golden-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps): a Piagetian assessment. Bird Behav 11:91–104Google Scholar
  11. Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L (2004) Testing social learning in a wild mountain parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Learn Behav 32:62–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (1986) Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of pigeons: a case of the skill pool effect. Anim Behav 34:797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (1987) Scrounging prevents cultural transmission in food-finding behaviour in pigeons. Anim Behav 35:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gossette RL (1968) Examination of retention decrement explanation of comparative successive discrimination reversal learning by birds and mammals. Percept Mot Skills 27:1147–1152Google Scholar
  15. Haemig PD (1989) A comparative experimental study of exploratory behavior in Santa Cruz Island and mainland California scrub jays Aphelocoma coerulescens. Bird Behav 8:32–42Google Scholar
  16. Higgins PJ (1999) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Huber L, Taborsky M, Rechberger S (2001) Social effects on object-exploration in keas. Anim Behav 62:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson JR (1969) What do keas die of? Notornis 16:33–44Google Scholar
  19. Jarret M, Wilson K-J (1999) Seasonal and diurnal attendance of kea (Nestor notabilis) at Halpin Creek rubbish dump, Arthur's Pass, New Zealand. Notornis 46:273–286Google Scholar
  20. Johnston R (1999) The Kea (Nestor notabilis): A New Zealand problem or problem solver? M.Sc. thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller R (1975) Das Spielverhalten der Keas (Nestor notabilis Gould) des Züricher Zoos. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 38:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein ED, Zentall TR (2003) Imitation and affordance learning by pigeons (Columbia livia). J Comp Psychol 117:414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kothbauer-Hellman R (1990) On the origin of a tradition: milk bottle opening by titmice (Aves, Paridae). Zool Anz 255:353–361Google Scholar
  24. Kubat S (1992) Die Rolle von Neuigkeit, Andersartigkeit und sozialer Struktur für die Exploration von Objekten beim Kea (Nestor notabilis). PhD thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  25. Kummer H, Goodall J (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond 308:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee P (1991) Adaptations to environmental change: an evolutionary perspective. In: Box HO (ed) Primate responses to environmental change. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 39–57Google Scholar
  28. Lefebvre L (2000) Feeding innovations and their cultural transmission in bird populations. In: Heyes CM, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 311–328Google Scholar
  29. Lefebvre L, Bolhuis J (2003) Positive and negative correlates of feeding innovation in birds. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–61Google Scholar
  30. Lefebvre L, Gaxiola A, Dawson S, Timmermans S, Rozsa L, Kabai P (1998) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in Australasian birds. Behaviour 134:1003–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lefebvre L, Nikolakakis N, Boire D (2002) Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139:939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marriner GB (1908) The kea: a New Zealand problem. Marriner Brothers, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsuzawa T, Biro D, Humle T, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R, Yamokoshi G (2001) Emergence of culture in wild chimpanzees: education by master-apprenticeship. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 557–574Google Scholar
  34. Petite O, Desportes C, Thierry B (1992) Differential probability of “coproduction” in two species of macaques (Macaca tonkeana, M. mulatta). Ethology 90:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pfeffer K, Fritz J, Kotrschal K (2002) Hormonal correlates of being an innovative graylag goose, Anser anser. Anim Behav 63:687–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Povinelli DJ (2000) Folk physics for apes. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4436–4441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation: An introduction. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  39. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Sasvàri L (1985) Keypeck conditioning with reinforcement in two different locations in trush, tit, and sparrow species. Behav Proc 11:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spence KW (1937) Experimental studies of learning and higher mental processes in infra-human primates. Psychol Bul 34:806–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Timmermans S, Lefebvre L, Boire D, Basu P (2000) Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of feeding innovation rate in birds. Brain Behav Evol 56:196–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Thorpe WH (1956) Learning and instincts in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomasello M (1990) Cultural transmission in the tool use and communicatory signalling of chimpanzees? In: Parker ST, Gibson KR (eds) Language and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–311Google Scholar
  45. Tomasello M (1998) Emulation learning and cultural learning. Behav Brain Sci 21:703–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vickery WL, Giraldeau L-A, Templeton JJ, Kramer DL, Chapman CA (1991) Producer, scroungers, and group foraging. Am Nat 137:847–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Visalberghi E, Limongelli L (1994) Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relation in tool-using capuchin monkeys Cebus apella. J Comp Physiol 108:15–22Google Scholar
  48. Webster SJ, Lefebvre L (2001) Problem solving and neophobia in a Passeriforme-Columbiforme assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav 62:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winkler H, Leisler B (1999) Exploration and curiosity in birds: functions and mechanisms. In: 22nd international ornitholical congress, Birdlife South Africa, Durban, Johannesburg, pp 915–932Google Scholar
  50. Wyles JS, Kunkel JG, Wilson AC (1983) Birds, behaviour, and anatomical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4394–4397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Behavior, Neurobiology and CognitionUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Konrad Lorenz Institute for EthologyAustrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations