Animal Cognition

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 141–150 | Cite as

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) holding on to memories: response competition causes retroactive interference effects

Original Article

Abstract

Five experiments on honeybees examined how the learning of a second task interferes with what was previously learned. Free flying bees were tested for landmark-based memory in variations on a paradigm of retroactive interference. Bees first learned Task 1, were tested on Task 1 (Test 1), then learned Task 2, and were tested again on Task 1 (Test 2). A 60-min delay (waiting in a box) before Test 2 caused no performance decrements. If the two tasks had conflicting response requirements, (e.g., target right of a green landmark in Task 1 and left of a blue landmark in Task 2), then a strong decrement on Test 2 was found (retroactive interference effect). When response competition was minimised during training or testing, however, the decrement on Test 2 was small or nonexistent. The results implicate response competition as a major contributor to the retroactive interference effect. The honeybee seems to hold on to memories; new memories do not wipe out old ones.

Keywords

Honeybee Landmark Spatial memory Retroactive interference Response competition 

References

  1. Anderson MC, Spellman BA (1995) On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychol Rev 102:68–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitterman ME (1996) Comparative analysis of learning in honeybees. Anim Learn Behav 24:123–141Google Scholar
  3. Bouton ME (1993) Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian conditioning. Psychol Bull 114:80–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouton ME, Nelson JB, Rosas JM (1999) Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychol Bull 125:171–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1982) How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source. Nature 295:560–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. J Comp Physiol A 151:521–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng K (1998a) Distances and directions are computed separately by honeybees in landmark-based search. Anim Learn Behav 26:455–468Google Scholar
  8. Cheng K (1998b) Honeybees (Apis mellifera) remember two near-target landmark constellations. Learn Motiv 29:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng K (1999a) Landmark-based spatial search in honeybees: I. Use of elements and interlandmark angles. Anim Cogn 2:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng K (1999b) Landmark-based spatial search in honeybees: II. Using gaps and blocks. Anim Cogn 2:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng K (2000) How honeybees find a place: Lessons from a simple mind. Anim Learn Behav 28:1–16Google Scholar
  12. Cheng K (2005) Context cues eliminate confusions from response competition in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Exp Biol 208:1019–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng K, Collett TS, Pickhard A, Wehner R (1987) The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal. J Comp Physiol A 161:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng K, Collett TS, Wehner R (1986) Honeybees learn the colour of landmarks. J Comp Physiol A 159:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng K, Spetch ML (2001) Blocking in the spatial domain in honeybees. Anim Learn Behav 29:1–9Google Scholar
  16. Chittka L (1998) Sensorimotor learning in bumblebees: Long-term retention and reversal training. J Exp Biol 201:515–524Google Scholar
  17. Chittka L, Thomson JD (1997) Sensori-motor learning and its relevance for task specialization in bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colborn M, Ahmad-Annuar A, Fauria K, Collett TS (1999) Contextual modulation of visuomotor associations in bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris). Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2413–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collett TS, Collett M (2002) Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nature Rev Neurosci 3:542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K (2003) Contextual cues and insect navigation. In: Jeffery KJ (ed), The neurobiology of spatial behaviour, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  21. Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K, Baron J (1997) Places and patterns—a study of context learning in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 181:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collett TS, Kelber A (1988) The retrieval of visuo-spatial memories by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 163:145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Collett TS, Rees J (1997) View-based navigation in Hymenoptera: multiple strategies of landmark guidance in the approach to a feeder. J Comp Physiol A 181:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Collett TS, Zeil J (1998) Places and landmarks: An arthropod perspective. In: Healy S (ed), Spatial representation in animals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 18–53Google Scholar
  25. Dukas R (1995) Transfer and interference in bumblebee learning. Anim Behav 49:1481–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dukas R (1999) Costs of memory: ideas and predictions. J Theor Biol 197:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyer FC, Gould J (1983) Honey bee navigation. Am Scientist 71:587–597Google Scholar
  28. Fry SN, Wehner R (2002) Honey bees store landmarks in an egocentric frame of reference. J Comp Physiol A 187:1009–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giurfa M, Zhang SW, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan MV (2001) The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect. Nature 410:930–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koltermann R (1969) Lern- und Vergessensprozesse bei der Honigbiene—aufgezeigt anhand von Duftdressuren [New data on processes of learning and forgetting, gained from scent training of honey-bees]. Z vergl Physiol 63:310–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koltermann R (1971) 24-Std-Periodik in der Langzeiterrinerung an Duft- und Farbsignale bei der Honigbiene [Circadian memory rhythm after scent and colour training with honey-bees]. Z vergl Physiol 75:49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kraemer PJ, Golding JM (1997) Adaptive forgetting in animals. Psychonomic Bull Rev 4:480–491Google Scholar
  33. Laughlin SB (2001) Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information. Curr Opinion Neurobiol 11:475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacLeod CM, Dodd MD, Sheard ED, Wilson DE, Bibi U (2003) In opposition to inhibition. In: Ross BH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 43, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 163–214Google Scholar
  35. Menzel R (1968) Das Gedächtnis der Honigbiene für Spektralfarben. I. Kurzzeitiges und langzeitiges Behalten [The honey bee's memory of spectral colours. I. Long-term and short-term retention]. Z vergl Physiol 60:82–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Menzel R (1969) Das Gedächtnis der Honigbiene für Spektralfarben. II. Umlernen und Mehrfachlernen [The honey bee's memory of spectral colours. II. Reversal learning and learning of several colours]. Z vergl Physiol 63:290–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts WA (1998) Principles of animal cognition, McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith BH, Cobey S (1994) The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants. J Exp Biol 195:91–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Gadakar R (1998a) Context-dependent learning in honeybees. Proc 26th Göttingen Neurobiol Conference: 521. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  40. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Zhu H (1998b) Honeybees link sights to smells. Nature 396:637–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Von Frisch K, Lindauer M (1954) Himmel und Erde in Konkurrenz bei der Orientierung der Bienen [Sky and Earth in competition in the orientation of bees]. Naturwissenschaften 41:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wahl O (1932) Neue Untersuchungen über das Zeitgedächtnis der Bienen [New investigations on memory for time in bees]. Z vergl Physiol 18:709–717Google Scholar
  43. Zentall TR (1997) Animal memory: the role of “instructions”. Learn Motiv 28:280–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour and Department of PsychologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations