Animal Cognition

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 215–219

Watching the best nutcrackers: what capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others’ tool-using skills

  • Eduardo B. Ottoni
  • Briseida Dogo de Resende
  • Patrícia Izar
Original Article

Abstract

The present work is part of a decade-long study on the spontaneous use of stones for cracking hard-shelled nuts by a semi-free-ranging group of brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Nutcracking events are frequently watched by other individuals - usually younger, less proficient, and that are well tolerated to the point of some scrounging being allowed by the nutcracker. Here we report findings showing that the choice of observational targets is an active, non-random process, and that observers seem to have some understanding of the relative proficiency of their group mates, preferentially watching the more skilled nutcrackers, which enhances not only scrounging payoffs, but also social learning opportunities.

Keywords

Tool use Primates Learning Social cognition Cebus apella 

Supplementary material

S1 Darwin and Edu watch Eli cracking nuts.

CapuchinTooUseWatch.avi (1.5 mb)
avi (1.5 MB)

mpg (4.2 MB)

References

  1. Anderson JR (1990) Use of objects as hammers to open nuts by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Folia Primatol 54:138–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck BB (1980) Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. Garland STM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Biro D, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R, Yamakoshi G, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T (2003) Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments. Anim Cogn 6:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne R, Whiten A (eds) (1988) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2004) Selection of tool diameter by New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides. Anim Cogn 7:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland A, Rocca AM, Wendt EL, Westergaard GC (2004) Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 7:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coussi-Korbel S, Fragaszy DM (1995) On the relation between social dynamics and social learning Anim Behav 50:1441–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasser V (1988) A social concept in Java monkeys. Anim Behav 36:225–230Google Scholar
  10. Evans TA, Westergaard GC (2004) Discrimination of functionally appropriate and inappropriate throwing tools by captive tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 7:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes MEB (1991) Tool use and predation of oysters (Crassostrea rhizophorae) by the tufted capuchin, Cebus apella apella, in brackish water mangrove swamp. Primates 32:529–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira RG (2003) Coalitions and social dynamics of a semi-free ranging Cebus apella group. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira RG, Resende BD, Mannu M, Ottoni EB, Izar P (2002) Bird predation and prey-transference in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Neotrop Primates 10:84–89Google Scholar
  14. Fragaszy D, Izar P, Visalberghi E, Ottoni EB, Oliveira M (2004) Wild capuchin monkeys use anvils and stone pounding tools. Am J Primatol 64:359–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujita K, Kuroshima H, Asai S (2003) How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? J. Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodall J (1970) Tool-using in primates and other vertebrates. In: Lehrman DS, Hinde RA, Shaw E (eds) Advances in the study of behavior. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C (1999) Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton- top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Anim Behav 57:565–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemelrijk C (1990a) Models of, and test for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at group level. Anim Behav 39:1013–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemelrijk C (1990b) A Matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level. J Theor Biol 143:405–420Google Scholar
  20. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol Human Behav 22:165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt GR (1996) Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt GR, Gray RD (2004) Direct observations of pandanus-tool manufacture and use by a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Anim Cogn 7:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inoue-Nakamura N, Matsuzawa T (1997) Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 111:159–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Izar P (2004) Female social relationships of Cebus apella nigritus in southeastern Atlantic Forest: an analysis through ecological models of primate social evolution. Behaviour 141:71–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson CM (2001) Distributed primate cognition: a review. Anim Cogn 4:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King BJ (1991) Social information transfer in monkeys, apes and hominids. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 34:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Langguth A, Alonso C (1997) Capuchin monkeys in the caatinga: tool use and food habits during drought. Neotrop Primates 5:77–78Google Scholar
  29. Matsuzawa T (1994) Field experiments on use of stone tools by chimpanzees in the wild. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne P (eds) Chimpanzee Cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–370Google Scholar
  30. McGrew WC (1992) Chimpanzee material culture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Oakley KP (1949) Man the toolmaker. British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Ottoni EB, Mannu M (2001) Semifree-ranging tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use tools to crack open nuts. Int J Primatol 22:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perry S, Barrett HC, Manson JH (2004) White-faced capuchin monkeys show triadic awareness in their choice of allies. Anim Behav 67:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Resende BD, Ottoni EB (2002a) Ontogeny of nutcracking behaviour in a semifree-ranging group of tufted capuchin monkeys. Abstract of the XIXth Congress of the Int Primatol Soc 319–320Google Scholar
  35. Resende BD, Ottoni EB (2002b) Brincadeira e aprendizagem do uso de ferramentas em macacos-prego (Cebus apella). Est Psicol (Natal) 7:173–180Google Scholar
  36. Resende BD, Izar P, Ottoni EB (2005) Social play and spatial tolerance in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Rev Etol (in press)Google Scholar
  37. Resende BD, Greco V, Ottoni EB, Izar P (2003) Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) predation on small mammals. Neotrop Primates 11:103–104Google Scholar
  38. Rilling JK, Insel TR (1999) The primate neocortex in comparative perspective using magnetic resonance imaging. J Human Evol 37:191–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Santos LR, Miller CT, Hauser MD (2003) Representing tools: how two non-human primate species distinguish between the functionally relevant and irrelevant features of a tool. Anim Cogn 6:269–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Schaik CP, Ancrenaz M, Borgen G, Galdikas B, Knott CD, Singleton I, Suzuki A, Utami SS, Merril M (2003) Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science 299:102–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Schaik CP, Fox EA, Sitompul AF (1996) Manufacture and use of tools in wild Sumatran orangutans: implications for human evolution. Naturwissenschaften 83:186–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Schaik CP, Deaner RO, Merrill M (1999) The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. J Human Evol 36:719–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sestini AE, Ottoni EB (1999) Estrutura social, manipulação de objetos e processos atencionais no infante em macacos-prego (Cebus apella). A Etol 17:117Google Scholar
  44. Silk JB (1999) Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies. Anim Behav 58:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strum SC, Forster D, Hutchins E (1997) Why Machiavellian intelligence may not be Machiavellian. In: Byrne RW, Whiten A (eds) Machiavellian intelligence. II. Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 50–85Google Scholar
  46. Visalberghi E, McGrew WC (1997) Cebus meets Pan. Int J Primatol 18:677–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Visalberghi E (1990) Tool use in Cebus. Folia Primatol 54:146–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Visalberghi E, Limongelli L (1994) Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 108:15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. de Waal FBM (1996) Good natured. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. de Waal FBM (2000) Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 60:253–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. de Waal FBM, Berger ML (2000) Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature 404:563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Westergaard GC, Fragaszy DM (1987) The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 101:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew WC, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin CEG, Wrangham RW, Boesch C (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) (1994) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo B. Ottoni
    • 1
  • Briseida Dogo de Resende
    • 1
  • Patrícia Izar
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Cognitive Ethology, Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of PsychologyUniversity of São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations