Animal Cognition

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 151–163 | Cite as

Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens)

Original Article

Abstract

There is currently much debate about the nature of social learning in chimpanzees. The main question is whether they can copy others’ actions, as opposed to reproducing the environmental effects of these actions using their own preexisting behavioral strategies. In the current study, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) were shown different demonstrations of how to open a tube—in both cases by a conspecific. In different experimental conditions, demonstrations consisted of (1) action only (the actions necessary to open the tube without actually opening it); (2) end state only (the open tube, without showing any actions); (3) both of these components (in a full demonstration); or (4) neither of these components (in a baseline condition). In the first three conditions subjects saw one of two different ways that the tube could open (break in middle; caps off ends). Subjects’ behavior in each condition was assessed for how often they opened the tube, how often they opened it in the same location as the demonstrator, and how often they copied the demonstrator’s actions or style of opening the tube. Whereas chimpanzees reproduced mainly the environmental results of the demonstrations (emulation), human children often reproduced the demonstrator’s actions (imitation). Because the procedure used was similar in many ways to the procedure that Meltzoff (Dev Psych 31:1, 1995) used to study the understanding of others’ unfulfilled intentions, the implications of these findings with regard to chimpanzees’ understanding of others’ intentions are also discussed.

Keywords

Social learning Imitation Emulation Children Chimpanzee 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported in part by a grant RR-00165 from the National Center for Research Resources to the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center. The Yerkes Center is fully accredited by the American Association of Laboratory Animal Care. We thank three anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Bellagamba F, Tomasello M (1999) Re-enacting intended acts: comparing 12- and 18-month-olds. Infant Behav Dev 22:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bugnyar T, Huber L (1997) Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets. Anim Behav 54:817–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Call J, Carpenter M (2002) Three sources of information in social learning. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 211–228Google Scholar
  4. Call J, Carpenter M (2003) On imitation in apes and children. Infanc Aprendiz 26:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Call J, Tomasello M (1994) The social learning of tool use by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Hum Evol 9:297–313Google Scholar
  6. Call J, Tomasello M (1995) The use of social information in the problem-solving of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 109:308–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter M, Call J (2002) The chemistry of social learning. Dev Sci 5:23–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter M, Akhtar N, Tomasello M (1998) Fourteen through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behav Dev 21:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Custance D, Whiten A, Fredman T (1999) Social learning of an artificial fruit task in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 113:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobson RP, Lee A (1999) Imitation and identification in autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:649–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Horner V, Whiten A (2004) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Horowitz AC (2003) Do humans ape? Or do apes human? Imitation and intention in humans (Homo sapiens) and other animals. J Comp Psychol 117:325–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson SC, Booth A, O’Hearn K (2001) Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent. Cogn Dev 16:637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 31:1–16Google Scholar
  15. Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Matsuzawa T (1999) Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 113:128–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Matsuzawa T (2000) Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 114:381–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagell K, Olguin R, Tomasello M (1993) Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 107:174–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stoinksi TS, Wrate JL, Ure N, Whiten A (2001) Imitative learning by captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in a simulated food-processing task. J Comp Psychol 115:272–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stoinski TS, Whiten A (2003) Social learning by orangutans (Pongo abelii and Pongo pygmaeus) in a simulated food-processing task. J Comp Psychol 117:272–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Templeton JJ (1998) Learning from others’ mistakes: a paradox revisited. Anim Behav 55:79–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tomasello M (1996) Do apes ape? In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, New York, pp 319–346Google Scholar
  22. Tomasello M, Davis-Dasilva M, Camak L, Bard K (1987) Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Hum Evol 2:175–183Google Scholar
  23. Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM (1990) Do monkeys ape? In: Parker ST, Gibson KR (eds) “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–273Google Scholar
  24. Want SC, Harris PL (2001) Learning from other people’s mistakes: causal understanding in learning to use a tool. Child Dev 72:431–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Whiten A, Custance DM, Gómez JC, Teixidor P, Bard KA (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josep Call
    • 1
    • 2
  • Malinda Carpenter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Tomasello
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Yerkes Regional Primate Research CenterEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations