Animal Cognition

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 239–246 | Cite as

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting

  • Robert R. Hampton
  • Aaron Zivin
  • Elisabeth A. Murray
Original Article

Abstract

Humans use memory awareness to determine whether relevant knowledge is available before acting, as when we determine whether we know a phone number before dialing. Such metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can improve selection of appropriate behavior. We investigated whether rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are capable of a simple form of metacognitive access to the contents of short-term memory. Monkeys chose among four opaque tubes, one of which concealed food. The tube containing the reward varied randomly from trial to trial. On half the trials the monkeys observed the experimenter baiting the tube, whereas on the remaining trials their view of the baiting was blocked. On each trial, monkeys were allowed a single chance to select the tube containing the reward. During the choice period the monkeys had the opportunity to look down the length of each tube, to determine if it contained food. When they knew the location of the reward, most monkeys chose without looking. In contrast, when ignorant, monkeys often made the effort required to look, thereby learning the location of the reward before choosing. Looking improved accuracy on trials on which monkeys had not observed the baiting. The difference in looking behavior between trials on which the monkeys knew, and trials on which they were ignorant, suggests that rhesus monkeys discriminate between knowing and not knowing. This result extends similar observations made of children and apes to a species of Old World monkey, suggesting that the underlying cognitive capacities may be widely distributed among primates.

Keywords

Metacognition Metamemory Declarative Introspection Memory awareness 

References

  1. Call J, Carpenter M (2001) Do apes and children know what they have seen? Anim Cogn 4:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark RE, Squire LR (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280:77–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H, Deacedo BS, Corkin S (1985) Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. In: Olton DS, Gamzu E, Corkin S (eds) Memory dysfunction: an integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 54–71Google Scholar
  4. Cowey A, Stoerig P (1995) Blindsight in monkeys. Nature 373:247–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallup GG (1994) Self-recognition: research strategies and experimental design. In: Parker ST, Mitchell RW, Boccia ML (eds) Self-awareness in animals and humans. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 35–50Google Scholar
  6. Hamman SB, Squire LR (1997) Intact perceptual memory in the absence of conscious memory. Behav Neurosci 111:850–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hampton RR (2001) Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. PNAS 98:5359–5362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hampton RR (2003) Metacognition and explicit representation in nonhumans. Behav Brain Sci 26:346–347Google Scholar
  9. Hampton RR, Murray EA (2002) Learning of discriminations is impaired, but generalization to altered views is intact, in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with perirhinal cortex removal. Behav Neurosci 116:363–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heyes CM (1994) Reflections on self-recognition in primates. Anim Behav 47:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inman A, Shettleworth SJ (1999) Detecting metamemory in nonverbal subjects: a test with pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AW, Cho RY, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303:1023–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
  14. Knowlton BJ, Squire LR (1993) The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science 262:1747–1749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Knowlton BJ, Ramus S, Squire LR (1992) Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia. Psychol Sci 3:172–179Google Scholar
  16. Matsumoto K, Tanaka K (2004) Conflict and cognitive control. Science 303:969–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Metcalfe J (2003) Drawing the line on metacognition. Behav Brain Sci 26:350–351Google Scholar
  18. Murray EA, Mishkin M (1986) Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy. J Neurosci 6:1991–2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker A (1998) Primate cognitive neuroscience: what are the useful questions? Behav Brain Sci 21:128–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Purdy JE, Domjan M (1998) Tactics in theory of mind research. Behav Brain Sci 21:129–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riley DA, Langley CM (1993) The logic of species comparisons. Psychol Sci 4:185–189Google Scholar
  22. Schall JD (2001) Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:33–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shettleworth SJ, Sutton JE (2003) Animal metacognition? It’s all in the methods. Behav Brain Sci 26:353–354Google Scholar
  24. Shillito DJ, Gallup GG, Beck BB (1999) Factors affecting mirror behavior in western lowland gorillas, Gorilla gorilla. Anim Behav 57:999–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith JD, Shields WE, Washburn DA, Allendoerfer KR (1998) Memory monitoring by animals and humans. J Exp Psychol 127:227–250Google Scholar
  26. Smith JD, Shields WE, Washburn DA (2003) The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behav Brain Sci 26:317–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  28. Tulving E, Schacter DL (1990) Priming and human memory systems. Science 247:301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiskrantz L (2001) Commentary responses and conscious awareness in humans: the implications for awareness in non-human animals. Anim Welfare 10:S41–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Hampton
    • 1
  • Aaron Zivin
    • 1
  • Elisabeth A. Murray
    • 1
  1. 1.Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of NeuropsychologyNational Institute of Mental Health, NIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations