Animal Cognition

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 27–37 | Cite as

A test of object permanence in a new-world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

  • Julie J. Neiworth
  • Eric Steinmark
  • Benjamin M. Basile
  • Ryann Wonders
  • Frances Steely
  • Catherine DeHart
Original Article


Cotton top tamarins were tested in visible and invisible displacement tasks in a method similar to that used elsewhere to test squirrel monkeys and orangutans. All subjects performed at levels significantly above chance on visible (n=8) and invisible (n=7) displacements, wherein the tasks included tests of the perseverance error, tests of memory in double and triple displacements, and "catch" trials that tested for the use of the experimenter's hand as a cue for the correct cup. Performance on all nine tasks was significantly higher than chance level selection of cups, and tasks using visible displacements generated more accurate performance than tasks using invisible displacements. Performance was not accounted for by a practice effect based on exposure to successive tasks. Results suggest that tamarins possess stage 6 object permanence capabilities, and that in a situation involving brief exposure to tasks and foraging opportunities, tracking objects' movements and responding more flexibly are abilities expressed readily by the tamarins.


Object permanence Monkeys Tamarins Object choice task Development 


  1. Baillargeon R (1995) Physical reasoning in infancy. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 181–204Google Scholar
  2. Call J (2000) Representing space and objects in monkeys and apes. Cogn Sci 24:397–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Call J (2001) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:159–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. de Blois ST, Novak MA (1994) Object permanence in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol 108:318–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Blois ST, Novak MA, Bond M (1998) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Psychol 112:137–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Blois ST, Novak MA, Bond M (1999) Can memory requirements account for species' differences in invisible displacement tasks? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:168–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond A (1988) Differences between adult and infant cognition: is the crucial variable presence or absence of language? In: Weiskrantz L (ed) Thought without language. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 337–370Google Scholar
  8. Diamond A (1991) Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. In: Carey S, Gelman R (eds) The epigenesis of mind: essays on biology and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 67–110Google Scholar
  9. Doré FY (1986) Object permanence in adult cats (Felis catus). J Comp Psychol 100:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doré FY (1990) Search behavior in cats (Felis catus) in an invisible displacement test: cognition and experience. Can J Psychol 44:359–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumas C (1992) Object permanence in cats (Felis catus): an ecological approach to the study of invisible displacements. J Comp Psychol 106:404–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumas C, Brunet C (1994) Permanence de l'objet chez le singe capucin (Cebus apella): etude des deplacements invisibles [Object permanence in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a study of invisible displacements]. Can J Exp Psychol 48:341–357Google Scholar
  13. Dumas C, Doré FY (1989) Cognitive development in kittens (Felis catus): a cross-sectional study of object permanence. J Comp Psychol 103:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumas C, Doré FY (1991) Cognitive development in kittens (Felis catus): an observational study of object permanence and sensorimotor intelligence. J Comp Psychol 105:357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dumas C, Wilkie DW (1995) Object permanence in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). J Comp Psychol 2:142–150Google Scholar
  16. Etienne AS (1984) The meaning of object permanence at different zoological levels. Hum Dev 27:309–320Google Scholar
  17. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1992) Search behavior in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues. J Comp Psychol 106:58–68Google Scholar
  18. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1993) Search behavior of dogs (Canis familiaris) in invisible displacement problems. Anim Learn Behav 21:246–254Google Scholar
  19. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1994) A cross-sectional study of object permanence in domestic puppies (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 108:220–232Google Scholar
  20. Goulet S, Doré FY, Rousseau R (1994) Object permanence and working memory in cats (Felis catus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20:347–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser MD (1997) Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language. Cognition 64:285–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hauser MD (2000) Wild minds: what animals really think. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hauser MD (2001) Searching for food in the wild: a nonhuman primate's expectations about invisible displacement. Dev Sci 4:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto C, Garrett J, Oser J (1995) Self-recognition in primates: phylogeny and the salience of species-typical traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:10811–10814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C (1999) Problem solving and functional design features: experiments with cotton-top tamarins. Anim Behav 57:565–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hauser MD, Williams T, Kralik JD, Moskovitz D (2001) What guides a search for food that has disappeared? Experiments on cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:140–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hood BM, Cole-Davies V, Dias M (2003) Looking and search measures of object knowledge in preschool children. Dev Psychol 39:61–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathieu M, Bergeron G (1981) Piagetian assessment of cognitive development in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). In: Chiarelli AB, Corruccini RS (eds) Primate behavior and sociobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 142–147Google Scholar
  29. Mathieu M, Bouchard MA, Granger L, Herscovitch J (1976) Piagetian object permanence in Cebus capucinus, Lagothrica flavicauda, and Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 24:585–588Google Scholar
  30. Milton K (1988) Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In: Byrne RW, Whiten A (eds) Machiavellian intelligence. Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 285–305Google Scholar
  31. Natale F, Antinucci F (1989) Stage 6 object-concept and representation. In: Antinucci F (ed) Cognitive structure and development in nonhuman primates. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 97–112Google Scholar
  32. Natale F, Antinucci F, Spinozzi G, Potí P (1986) Stage 6 object concept in nonhuman primate cognition: a comparison between gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). J Comp Psychol 100:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neiworth JJ, Anders SL, Parsons RR (2001) Tracking responses related to self-recognition: a frequency comparison of responses to mirrors, photographs, and videotape of monkeys by cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 115:432–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Neiworth JJ, Burman MA, Basile BM, Lickteig MT (2002) Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a new world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 116:3–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pepperberg IM (2002) The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies. Anim Cogn 5:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pepperberg IM, Kozak FA (1986) Object permanence in the African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Learn Behav 14:322–330Google Scholar
  37. Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravits LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75Google Scholar
  38. Piaget J (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. (Cook M, trans) International Universities Press, New York (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
  39. Piaget J (1954) The construction of reality in the child. (Cook M, trans) Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Redshaw M (1978) Cognitive development in human and gorilla infants. J Hum Evol 7:133–141Google Scholar
  41. Schino G, Spinozzi G, Berlinguer L (1990) Object concept and mental representation in Cebus apella and Macaca fascicularis. Primates 31:537–544Google Scholar
  42. Spinozzi G, Natale F (1989) Early sensorimotor development in gorilla. In: Antinucci F (ed) Cognitive structure and development in nonhuman primates. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 21–38Google Scholar
  43. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Triana E, Pasnak R (1981) Object permanence in cats and dogs. Anim Learn Behav 9:135–139Google Scholar
  45. Vaughter RM, Smotherman W, Ordy JM (1972) Development of object permanence in the infant squirrel monkey. Dev Psychol 7:34–38Google Scholar
  46. Watson JS, Gergely G, Csanyi V, Topal J, Gacsi M, Sarkozi Z (2001) Distinguishing logic from association in the solution of an invisible displacement task by children and dogs: using negation of disjunction. J Comp Psychol 115:219–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wise KL, Wise LA, Zimmermann RR (1974) Piagetian object permanence in the infant rhesus monkey. Dev Psychol 10:429–437Google Scholar
  48. Wood S, Moriarty KM, Gardner BT, Gardner RA (1980) Object permanence in child and chimpanzee. Anim Learn Behav 8:3–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie J. Neiworth
    • 1
  • Eric Steinmark
    • 1
  • Benjamin M. Basile
    • 1
  • Ryann Wonders
    • 1
  • Frances Steely
    • 1
  • Catherine DeHart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton CollegeNorthfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations