Visual Geosciences

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 105–115 | Cite as

Ubiquitous interactive visualization of 3D mantle convection using a web-portal with Java and Ajax framework

  • James B. S. G. Greensky
  • Wojciech Walter Czech
  • David A. Yuen
  • Michael Richard Knox
  • Megan Rose Damon
  • Shi Steve Chen
  • M. Charley Kameyama
Original Article

Abstract

We have developed a new strategy and espouse a novel paradigm for large-scale computing and real-time interactive visualization. This philosophy calls for intense interactive sessions for a couple of hours at a time at the expense of storing data on many disk drives during regular or heroic runs on massively parallel systems. We have already carried out successfully real-time volume-rendering visualization by employing hundreds of processors for a grid with over 25 million unknowns. Both Cartesian and spherical 3D mantle convection are visualized. The volume-rendered images are viewed on a large display device, with many panels holding around 13 million pixels. We will employ a software strategy involving an hierarchical rendering service, which will have as software an Ajax interface for interactive visualization of large data sets on many different platforms from desktop PC’s to hand-held devices, such as the OQO and the Nokia N-800. An option for stereo viewing is also implemented. We have installed a user interface as web application, using Java and Ajax framework in order to achieve over the Internet reasonable accessibility to our ongoing runs. Our goal is to expand the array of interactive devices, which will make it feasible to carry out ubiquitous visualization and monitoring of large-scale simulations or onsite events and to allow for collaborations across oceans.

Keywords

Visualization 3D mantle convection Hand-held device Java Ajax framework 

References

  1. Brandt A (1977) Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary-value problems. Math Comput 31:333–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chorin AJ (1967) A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. J Comp Phys 2:12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen RE (2005) High-performance computing requirements for the computational solid-earth sciences, p 101. http://www.geo-prose.com/computational_SES.html
  4. Kageyama A, Sato T (2004) “Yin-Yang grid”: an overset grid in spherical geometry. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 5, Q09005. doi:10.1029/2004GC000734
  5. Kageyama A (2005) Dissection of a sphere and Yin-Yang grid. J Earth Simulator 3:20–28Google Scholar
  6. Chin-Purcell K (1992) All about Bob: a tool for browsing 3D data sets, Army High Performance Computing Research Center, Minneapolis, AHPCRC preprint, no. 92–141Google Scholar
  7. Damon M, Kameyama M, Knox M, Porter D, Yuen D, Sevre E (2008) Interactive visualization of 3D mantle convection. Vis Geosci. doi:10.1007/s10069-007-0008-1
  8. Goyette S, Takatsuka M, Clark S, Mueller RD, Rey P, Stegman DR (2007) Increasing the usability and accessibility of geodynamic modelling tools to the geoscience community: underworld GUI. Vis Geosci (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Graham SL, Snir M, Patterson CA (eds) (2005) Getting up to speed: the future of supercomputing. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., p 289Google Scholar
  10. Kameyama M (2005) ACuTEMan: a multigrid-based mantle convection simulation code and its optimization to the earth simulator. J Earth Simulator 4:2–10Google Scholar
  11. Kameyama M, Kageyama A, Sato T (2007) Multigrid-based simulation code for mantle convection in spherical shell using Yin-Yang Grid. Phys Earth Planet Int (submitted) Google Scholar
  12. Kameyama M, Kageyama A, Sato T (2005) Multigrid iterative algorithm using pseudo-compressibility for three-dimensional mantle convection with strongly variable viscosity. J Comput Phys 206:162–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pilgrim M (2002) What is RSS. Retrieved March 1, 2008 from http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/12/18/dive-into-xml.html
  14. Porter DH (2002) Volume visualization of high-resolution data using PC Clusters. http://www.lcse.umn.edu/hvr/pc_vol_rend_L.pdf/
  15. Porter DH, Woodward PR, Iyer A (2002) Initial experiences wtih grid-based volume visualization of fluid low simulations on PC Clusters. http://www.lcse.umn.edu/dhp1/articles.html.
  16. Trottenberg U, Oosterlee C, Schueller A (2001) Multigrid. Academic Press, London, p 631Google Scholar
  17. Wesseling P (1992) An introduction to multigrid methods. Wiley, New York, p 284Google Scholar
  18. Stegman DR, Moresi L, Turnbull R, Lo A, Quenette S (2005) gLucifer: next-generation visualization framework for high-performance computational geodynamic models. Eos Trans AGU Fall Meet Suppl, Abstract IN42A-03Google Scholar
  19. Stegman DR, Moresi L, Turnbull R, Giordani J, Sunter P, Lo A, Quenette S (2008) gLucifer: next generation visualization framework for high-performance computational geodynamics. Vis Geosci (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Willoughby HE (2007) Atmosphere: forecasting hurricane intensity and impacts. Science 315(5816):1232–12332. doi:10.1126/science.1140041 Google Scholar
  21. Yuen D, Damon M, Kameyama M, Knox M, Porter D, Sevre E, Woodward P (2007) Interactive visualization and monitoring of large-scale 3D mantle convection runs, Abstract for AGU, San Francisco, CA, DecemberGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James B. S. G. Greensky
    • 1
  • Wojciech Walter Czech
    • 2
  • David A. Yuen
    • 1
  • Michael Richard Knox
    • 1
  • Megan Rose Damon
    • 3
  • Shi Steve Chen
    • 4
  • M. Charley Kameyama
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratory of Computing Science and Engineering and Minnesota Supercomputing InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceAGH UniversityKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Scientific Integration and Visualization OfficeCode 610.3 NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  4. 4.Laboratory of Computational GeodynamicsGraduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.Geodynamics Research CenterEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations