Advertisement

Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1769–1777 | Cite as

Development of RAPD-PCR assay for identifying Holstein, Angus, and Taiwan Yellow Cattle for meat adulteration detection

  • Chin-Cheng Lin
  • Pin-Chi Tang
  • Hsin-I ChiangEmail author
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Incidents of food fraud have occurred worldwide, particularly in the form of meat adulteration. In this study, molecular probes were developed using the Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique in order to identify three beef subspecies–Holstein, Angus, and Taiwan Yellow Cattle. Four RAPD-PCR 10-nucleotide primers were chosen out of a total of 60 primers. The selection was based on the reproducibility of species-specific amplicons able to detect various origins of cattle breeds. The results demonstrated that primer OPK12 produced three unique amplicons (1100 bp, 1000 bp and 480 bp) in Holstein; primer OPK14 generated one amplicon that only appeared in Holstein and Angus (200 bp); primer OPK19 amplified two species-specific amplicons in Holstein measuring 550 bp and 650 bp, respectively. However, due to the relatively lower repeatability of RAPD-PCR, higher and more specific testing repeats were required to increase the accuracy of the conclusion.

Keywords

RAPD-PCR Food adulteration Cattle Meat product Species identification 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman SM, Ahmed MMM. Rapid and sensitive identification of buffalo’s, cattle’s and sheep’s milk using species-specific PCR and PCR–RFLP techniques. Food Control. 18: 1246–1249 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen S, Zhang Y, Li H, Wang J, Chen W, Zhou Y, Zhou S. Differentiation of fish species in Taiwan Strait by PCR-RFLP and lab-on-a-chip system. Food Control. 44: 26–34 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Combes MC, Joët T, Lasherme P. Development of a rapid and efficient DNA-based method to detect and quantify adulterations in coffee (Arabica versus Robusta). Food Control. 88: 198–206 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fajardo V, Gonzlez I, Martn I, Rojas M, Hernndez PE, Garca T, Martn R. Real-time PCR for quantitative detection of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) and pyrenean ibex (Capra pyrenaica) in meat mixtures. J. AOAC Int. 91: 103–111 (2008)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaur J, Lee S, Park YS, Sharma A. RAPD analysis of Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains associated with vegetables and food products from Korea. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 77: 383–388 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keeratipibul S, Techaruwichit P. Tracking sources of Listeria contamination in a cooked chicken meat factory by PCR-RAPD-based DNA fingerprinting. Food Control. 27: 64–72 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim MJ, Kim HY. Species identification of commercial jerky products in food and feed using direct pentaplex PCR assay. Food Control. 78: 1–6 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim MJ, Kim HY. Development of a fast duplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of chicken and pigeon in raw and heat-treated. Food Control. 85: 1–5 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kitpipit T, Sittichan K, Thanakiatkrai P. Direct-multiplex PCR assay for meat species identification in food products. Food Chem. 163: 77–82 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koh MC, Lim CH, Chua SB, Chew ST, Phang STW. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints for identification of red meat animal species. Meat Sci. 48: 275–285 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar A, Kumar RR, Sharma BD, Gokulakrishnan P, Mendiratta SK & Sharma D. Identification of Species Origin of Meat and Meat Products on the DNA Basis: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 55: 1340–1351 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwon GH, Lee HA, Park JY, Kim JS, Lim J, Park CK, Kwon DY, Kim YS, Kim JH. Development of a RAPD-PCR method for identification of Bacillus species isolated from Cheonggukjang. Int. J. Food Microbol. 129: 282–287 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martinez I, Yman IM. Species identification in meat products by RAPD analysis. Food Res. Int. 31: 459–466 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peng GJ, Chang MH, Fang M, Liao CD, Tsai CF, Tseng SH, Kao YM, Chou HK, Cheng HF. Incidents of major food adulteration in Taiwan between 2011 and 2015. Food Control. 72: 145–152 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Perez T, Albornoz J, Dominguez A. An evaluation of RAPD fragment reproducibility and nature. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1347–1357 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rahman MM, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Bhassu S, Mustafa S, Al Amin M, Razzak MA. Lab-on-a-Chip PCR-RFLP Assay for the Detection of Canine DNA in Burger Formulations. Food Anal. Methods. 8: 1598–1606 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahmati S, Julkapli NM, Yehye WA, Basirun WJ. Identification of meat origin in food products–A review. Food Control. 68: 379–390 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rastogi G, Dharne MS, Walujkar S, Kumar A, Patole MS, Shouche YS. Species identification and authentication of tissues of animal origin using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Meat Sci. 76: 666–674 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ropodi AI, Panagou EZ, Nychas GJE. Multispectral imaging (MSI): A promising method for the detection of minced beef adulteration with horsemeat. Food Control. 73: 57–63 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shehata MM. The Roles of Seed Proteins and RAPD-PCR in Genotyping Variabilities of Some Wheat (Triticum vulgare L.) Cultivars. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 7: 984–994 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Soares S, Amaral JS, Oliveira MBP, Mafra I. A SYBR Green real-time PCR assay to detect and quantify pork meat in processed poultry meat products. Meat Sci. 94: 115–120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sobrino-Gregorio L, Vilanova S, Prohens J, Escriche I. Detection of honey adulteration by conventional and real-time PCR. Food Control. 95: 57–62 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thanakiatkrai P, Dechnakarin J, Ngasaman R, Kitpipit T. Direct pentaplex PCR assay: An adjunct panel for meat species identification in Asian food products. Food Chem. 271: 762–772 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Velioglu HM, Sezer B, Bilge G, Baytur SE, Boyaci IH. Identification of offal adulteration in beef by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Meat Sci. 138: 28–33 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu R, Wei S, Zhou G, Ren J, Liu Z, Tang S, Cheung PCK, Wu X. Multiplex TaqMan locked nucleic acid real-time PCR for the differential identification of various meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 137: 41–46 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan
  2. 2.The IEGG and Animal Biotechnology CenterNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan
  3. 3.Center for the Integrative and Evolutionary Galliformes GenomicsNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations