Advertisement

Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1239–1244 | Cite as

Combined effect of bacteriophage and antibiotic on the inhibition of the development of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella typhimurium

  • Kantiya Petsong
  • Md Jalal Uddin
  • Kitiya Vongkamjan
  • Juhee Ahn
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the combined effects of bacteriophage and antibiotic on the reduction of the development of antibiotic-resistance in Salmonella typhimurium LT2. The susceptibilities of S. typhimurium to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin were increased when treated with bacteriophages, showing more than 10% increase in clear zone sizes and greater than twofold decrease in minimum inhibitory concentration values. The growth of S. typhimurium was effectively inhibited by the combination of bacteriophage P22 and ciprofloxacin. The combination treatment effectively reduced the development of antibiotic resistance in S. typhimurium. The relative expression levels of efflux pump-related genes (acrA, acrB, and tolC) and outer membrane-related genes (ompC, ompD, and ompF) were decreased at all treatments. This study provides useful information for designing new antibiotic therapy to control antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Keywords

Bacteriophage Salmonella Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin Disk diffusion assay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A3B01008304). This study was supported by a Research Grant from Kangwon National University (2017) (Grant number: D1001438-01-01). This study was also supported by funding from the graduate school of Prince of Songkla University.

References

  1. 1.
    Acheson D, Hohmann EL. Nontyphoidal Salmonellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32: 263–269 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ao TT, Feasey NA, Gordon MA, Keddy KH, Angulo FJ, Crump JA. Global burden of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21: 941–949 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardina C, Spricigo DA, Cortes P, Llagostera M. Significance of the bacteriophage treatment schedule in reducing Salmonella colonization of poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 6600–6607 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bielke L, Higgins S, Donoghue A, Donoghue D, Hargis BM. Salmonella host range of bacteriophages that infect multiple genera. Poul. Sci. 86: 2536–2540 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaudhry WN, Concepción-Acevedo J, Park T, Andleeb S, Bull JJ, Levin BR. Synergy and order effects of antibiotics and phages in killing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS ONE 12: e0168615 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comeau AM, Tétart F, Trojet SN, Prère M-F, Krisch HM. Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS): β-Lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phage growth. PLoS ONE 2: e799 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahshan H, Shahada F, Chuma T, Moriki H, Okamoto K. Genetic analysis of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovars Stanley and Typhimurium from cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 145: 76–83 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giedraitienė A, Vitkauskienė A, Naginienė R, Pavilonis A. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms of clinically important bacteria. Medicina 47: 137–146 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jo A, Ding T, Ahn J. Synergistic antimicrobial activity of bacteriophages and antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 25: 935–940 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamal F, Dennis JJ. Burkholderia cepacia complex phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS): Antibiotics stimulate lytic phage activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81: 1132–1138 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kobayashi N, Tamura N, van Veen HW, Yamaguchi A, Murakami S. β-Lactam selectivity of multidrug transporters AcrB and AcrD resides in the proximal binding pocket. J. Biol. Chem. 289: 10680–10690 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 317–327 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin H-L, Lin C-C, Lin Y-J, Lin H-C, Shih C-M, Chen C-R, Huang R-N, Kuo T-C. Revisiting with a relative-density calibration approach the determination of growth rates of microorganisms by use of optical density data from liquid cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 1683–1685 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT Method. Method. 25: 402–8 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mather AE, Reid SW, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Fookes MC, Harris SR, Brown DJ, Coia JE, Mulvey MR, Gilmour MW, Petrovska L, de Pinna E, Kuroda M, Akiba M, Izumiya H, Connor TR, Suchard MA, Lemey P, Mellor DJ, Haydon DT, Thomson NR. Distinguishable epidemics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in different hosts. Science 341: 1514–7 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michael GB, Schwarz S. Antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic nontyphoidal Salmonella; an alarming trend? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22: 968–974 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miró E, Vergés C, García I, Mirelis B, Navarro F, Coll P, Prats G, Martínez-Martínez L. Resistance to quinolones and β-lactams in Salmonella enterica due to mutations in topoisomerase-encoding genes, altered cell permeability and expression of an active efflux system. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 33: 204–211 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moya-Torres A, Mulvey MR, Kumar A, Oresnik IJ, Brassinga AKC. The lack of OmpF, but not OmpC, contributes to increased antibiotic resistance in Serratia marcescens. Microbiol. 160: 1882–1892 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muniesa M, Colomer-Lluch M, Jofre J. Potential impact of environmental bacteriophages in spreading antibiotic resistance genes. Future Microbiol. 8: 739–751 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nikaido E, Yamaguchi A, Nishino K. AcrAB multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 24245–24253 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nikaido H, Basina M, Nguyen V, Rosenberg EY. Multidrug efflux pump AcrAB of Salmonella typhimurium excretes only those beta-lactam antibiotics containing lipophilic side chains. J. Bacteriol. 180: 4686–92 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oechslin F, Piccardi P, Mancini S, Gabard J, Moreillon P, Entenza JM, Resch G, Que Y-A. Synergistic interaction between phage therapy and antibiotics clears Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in endocarditis and reduces virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 215: 703–712 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perera MN, Abuladze T, Li M, Woolston J, Sulakvelidze A. Bacteriophage cocktail significantly reduces or eliminates Listeria monocytogenes contamination on lettuce, apples, cheese, smoked salmon and frozen foods. Food Microbiol. 52: 42–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piddock LV. Understanding the basis of antibiotic resistance: a platform for drug discovery. Microbiol. 160: 2366–2373 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health 109: 309–318 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rakhuba DV, Kolomiets EI, Dey ES, Novik GI. Bacteriophage receptors, mechanisms of phage adsorption and penetration into host cell. Pol. J. Microbiol. 59: 145–155 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ricci V, Piddock LJ. Only for substrate antibiotics are a functional AcrAB-TolC efflux pump and RamA required to select multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64: 654–7 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rushdy AA, Mabrouk MI, Abu-Sefa FA-H, Kheiralla ZH, -All SMA, Saleh NM. Contribution of different mechanisms to the resistance to fluoroquinolones in clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 17: 431–437 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryan EM, Alkawareek MY, Donnelly RF, Gilmore BF. Synergistic phage-antibiotic combinations for the control of Escherichia coli biofilms in vitro. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 65: 395–398 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spricigo DA, Bardina C, Cortés P, Llagostera M. Use of a bacteriophage cocktail to control Salmonella in food and the food industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 165: 169–174 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stecher B, Hapfelmeier S, Müller C, Kremer M, Stallmach T, Hardt W-D. Flagella and chemotaxis are required for efficient induction of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis in streptomycin-pretreated mice. Infect. Immun. 72: 4138–4150 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Webber MA, Piddock LJV. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51: 9–11 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologyPrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Medical Biomaterials Engineering and Institute of Bioscience and BiotechnologyKangwon National UniversityChuncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations