Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1591–1596 | Cite as

Physical properties of muffins sweetened with steviol glycosides as the sucrose replacement

  • Sabina KarpEmail author
  • Jarosław Wyrwisz
  • Marcin Kurek
  • Agnieszka Wierzbicka


Overconsumption of sweets contributes to increasing obesity among children and adults. Functional food brings an opportunity to improve nutritional value of commonly eaten products, e.g., pastry products. New trends in the food industry tend to produce low-calorie products by replacing sugar or fat with additives having pro-health benefits. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of replacing sucrose with steviol glycosides (natural non-caloric sweetener) on the quality properties of bakery products. The analysis of muffin’s texture, color, cooking yield, browning index, and sensory analysis were performed. The study showed that a 25% addition of steviol sweetener (as a sucrose replacement) was the most appropriate modification of the basic formula. The resulting muffins gained sensory attractiveness and health-promoting qualities. Moreover, the study showed that a reduction of sucrose in excess of 50% had a negative impact on the quality of muffins and their sensory profiles.


steviol glycosides functional food muffins texture profile analysis color 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bigliardi B, Galati F. Innovation trends in the food industry: The case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 31: 118–129 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bornkessel S, Bröring S, (Onno) Omta SWF, van Trijp H. What determines ingredient awareness of consumers? A study on ten functional food ingredients. Food Qual. Prefer. 32: 330–339 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaur S, Das M. Functional foods: An overview. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 20: 861–875 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartrina JA, Rodrigo CP. The relationship between sucrose consumption and cancer; A review of the evidence. Nutr. Hosp. 28: 95–105 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saavedra JM, Deming D, Dattilo A, Reidy K. Lessons from the feeding infants and toddlers study in North America: What children eat, and implications for obesity prevention. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 62: 27–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ureta MM, Olivera DF, Salvadori VO. Quality attributes of muffins: Effect of baking operative conditions. Food Bioprocess Tech. 7: 463–470 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martínez-Cervera S, Sanz T, Salvador A, Fiszman SM. Rheological, textural and sensorial properties of low-sucrose muffins reformulated with sucralose/polydextrose. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 45: 213–220 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nip W-K. Sweeteners. pp. 137–160. In: Bakery Products: Science and Technology. Hui YH (ed). Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, USA (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Struck S, Jaros D, Brennan CS, Rohm H. Sugar replacement in sweetened bakery goods. Int. J. Food. Sci. Tech. 49: 1963–1976 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lemus-Mondaca R, Vega-Gálvez A, Zura-Bravo L, Ah-Hen K. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, source of a high-potency natural sweetener: A comprehensive review on the biochemical, nutritional and functional aspects. Food Chem. 132: 1121–1132 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Madan S, Ahmad S, Singh GN, Kohli K, Kumar Y, Singh R, Garg M. Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni-A Review. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 1: 267–286 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koyama E, Kitazawa K, Ohori Y, Izawa O, Kakegawa K, Fujino A, Ui M. In vitro metabolism of the glycosidic sweeteners, stevia mixture and enzymatically modified stevia in human intestinal microflora. Food Chem. Toxicol. 41: 359–374 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thiyagarajan M, Venkatachalam P. Large scale in vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (bert) for commercial application: Pharmaceutically important and antidiabetic medicinal herb. Ind. Crop. Prod. 37: 111–117 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas JE, Glade MJ. Stevia: It’s not just about calories. Open Obes. J. 2: 101–109 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anton SD, Martin CK, Han H, Coulon S, Cefalu WT, Geiselman P, Williamson DA. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 55: 37–43 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goyal SK, Samsher, Goyal RK. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 61: 1–10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission 12.11.2011. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2011: 205–211 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szczesniak AS. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Prefer. 13: 215–225 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pathare PB, Opara UL, Al-Said FA-J. Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6: 36–60 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kroyer G. Stevioside and Stevia-sweetener in food: Application, stability and interaction with food ingredients. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. 5: 225–229 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ureta MM, Olivera DF, Salvadori VO. Baking of muffins: Kinetics of crust color development and optimal baking time. Food Bioprocess Technol. 7: 3208–3216 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NORM ISO. Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms. (1988)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polska Norma P 4121: 1998. Anal. sensoryczna–Metodologia–Ocena produktów Zywn. przy uzyciu Metod skalowania [Polish Stand. PN-ISO 4121 19-98. Sens. Anal. Methodol. Eval. Foodst. by using calibration methods] [in Polish]Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norma P PN–ISO 6658 Analiza sensoryczna. Metodol. Wytyczne ogólne. [Polish Stand. PN-ISO 6658. Sens. Anal. General guidelines] [in Polish]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Póltorak A, Wyrwisz J, Moczkowska M, Marcinkowska-Lesiak M, Stelmasiak A, Ulanicka U, Zalewska M, Wierzbicka A, Sun DW. Correlation between instrumental texture and colour quality attributes with sensory analysis of selected cheeses as affected by fat contents. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 50: 999–1008 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scheuren H, Baldus M, Methner F-J, Dillenburger M. Evaporation behaviour of DMS in an aqueous solution at infinite dilution-A review. J. I. Brewing. 122: 181–190 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    González-Mateo S, González-SanJosé ML, Muñiz P. Presence of Maillard products in Spanish muffins and evaluation of colour and antioxidant potential. Food Chem. Toxicol. 47: 2798–2805 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kulthe AA, Pawar VD, Kotecha PM, Chavan UD, Bansode VV. Development of high protein and low calorie cookies. J. Food Sci. Tech.-Mys 51: 153–157 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ronda F, Gómez M, Blanco CA, Caballero PA. Effects of polyols and nondigestible oligosaccharides on the quality of sugar-free sponge cakes. Food Chem. 90: 549–555 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martínez-Cervera S, Salvador A, Sanz T. Comparison of different polyols as total sucrose replacers in muffins: Thermal, rheological, texture and acceptability properties. Food Hydrocolloid. 35: 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Struck S, Gundel L, Zahn S, Rohm H. Fiber enriched reduced sugar muffins made from iso-viscous batters. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 65: 32–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabina Karp
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jarosław Wyrwisz
    • 1
  • Marcin Kurek
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Wierzbicka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Technique and Food Development, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer SciencesWarsaw University of Life SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations