Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Nutritional quality changes of fresh-cut tomato during shelf life

  • Maria D. C. Antunes
  • Daniela Rodrigues
  • Vasilios Pantazis
  • Ana M. Cavaco
  • Anastasios S. Siomos
  • Graça Miguel
Research Article


Effects of dip treatments on nutritional quality preservation during the shelf life of fresh-cut tomato (Licopersicum esculentum Mill.) cv. Eufrates were investigated. Fresh-cut tomatoes were dipped in solutions of 2% ascorbic acid, citric acid, and calcium lactate for 2 min, then stored at 4°C for 20 days. Color (L*, a*, and b*), firmness, °Brix, phenolics, ascorbic acid content, antioxidant activity (DPPH), and sugars were measured during storage. Pathogen development was monitored, and a sensory evaluation was performed. Ascorbic acid was better in maintaining firmness. No treatments significantly affected °Brix, color, or sugars. Ascorbic acid maintained a higher antioxidant capacity, phenolics, and ascorbic acid content, and was better at reducing bacterial growth, while citric acid treatment was better at prevention of yeast and molds proliferation. Fresh-cut tomatoes showed good quality after 10 days of shelf life, except for flavor with the calcium lactate treatment. Ascorbic acid treatment better preserved the general and nutritional quality parameters.


citric acid ascorbic acid antioxidant capacity calcium lactate dip treatment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Passam HC, Karapanos IC, Bebeli PJ, Savvas D. A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post-harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 1: 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Odriozola-Serrano I, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O. Effect of minimal processing on bioactive compounds and color attributes of fresh-cut tomatoes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 41: 217–226 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batu A. Determination of acceptable firmness and colour values of tomatoes. J. Food Eng. 61: 471–475 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeong J, Brecht JK, Huber DJ, Sargent SA. 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) for maintaining texture quality of fresh-cut tomato. Hortscience 39: 1359–1362 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ayala-Zavala JF, Oms-Oliu G, Odriozola-Serrano I, González-Aguilar GA, Álvarez-Parrilla E, Martín-Belloso O. Bio-preservation of fresh-cut tomatoes using natural antimicrobials. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 226: 1047–1055 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aguayo E, ESscalona V, Artés F. Quality of fresh-cut tomato as affected by type of cut, packaging, temperature, and storage time. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 219: 492–499 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mencarelli F, Saltveit ME. Ripening of mature-green tomato fruit slices. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113: 742–745 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin-Diana AB, Ricoa D, Friasa JM, Barat JM, Henehana GTM, Barry-Ryan C. Calcium for extending the shelf life of fresh whole and minimally processed fruit and vegetables: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 18: 210–218 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antunes MDC, Dundlen S, Cavaco A, Miguel G. Effects of postharvest application of 1-MCP and postcutting dip treatment on the quality and nutritional properties of fresh-cut kiwifruit. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58: 6173–6181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oms-Oliu G, Rojas-Grau MA, Gonzalez LA, Varela P, Soliva-Fortuny R, Hernando MIH, Munuera IP, Fiszman S, Martín-Belloso O. Recent approaches using chemical treatments to preserve quality of fresh-cut fruit: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 57: 139–148 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Artés F, Conesa MA, Hernández S, Gil MI. Keeping quality of fresh-cut tomato. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 17: 153–162 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16: 144–158 (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 28: 25–30 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Direction General of Quality. Food Microbiology. General Rules for Microbial Counts at 30°C. 1st ed. Standard NP-1995, based on ISO 4833-1978. Direction General of Quality, Lisbon, Portugal. p. 5 (1983)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Portuguese Institute of Quality. Food Microbiology. Count of Moulds and Yeasts. Part 1: Incubation at 25°C. 1st ed. Standard NP 3277-1. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Lisbon, Portugal. p. 4 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cocci E, Rocculi P, Romani S, Rosa MD. Changes in nutritional properties of minimally processed apples during storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39: 265–271 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agar IT, Massantini R, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA. Postharvest CO2 and ethylene production and quality maintenance of fresh-cut kiwifruit slices. J. Food Sci. 64: 433–440 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antunes MDC, Rodrigues DAC, Cavaco AM, Miguel MG. Evaluation of quality changes during shelf life in minimally processed kiwifruit. Acta Hortic. 913: 553–558 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Villas-Boas EVB, Kader AA. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on softening of fresh-cut kiwifruit, mango and persimmon slices. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43: 238–244 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mcguire RG. Reporting of objective color measurements. Hortscience 27: 1254–1255 (1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demnitz-King A, Ho LC, Baker DA. Activity of sucrose hydrolysing enzymes and sugar accumulation during tomato fruit development. Plant Growth Regul. 22: 193–201 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chung TT, West G, Tucker GA. Effect of wounding on cell wall hydrolase activity in tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 40: 250–255 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gonzalez-Aguilar GA, Ruiz-Cruz S, Soto-Valdez H, Vazquez-Ortiz F, Pacheco-Aguilar R, Wang CY. Biochemical changes of fresh-cut pineapple slices treated with anti-browning agents. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 40: 377–383 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonzalez-Aguilar GA, Celis J, Sotelo-Mundo RR, de La Rosa LA, Rodrigo-Garcia J, Alvarez-Parrilla E. Physiological and biochemical changes of different fresh-cut mango cultivars stored at 5°C. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 43: 91–101 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rocculi P, Galindo FG, Mendonza F, Wadso L, Romani S, Rosa MD, Sjoholm I. Effects of the application of anti-browning substances on the metabolic activity and sugar composition of freshcut potatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43: 151–157 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaur C, George B, Deepa N, Singh B, Kapoor HC. Antioxidant status of fresh and processed tomato — A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41: 479–486 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toor RK, Savage GP. Changes in major antioxidant components of tomatoes during post-harvest storage. Food Chem. 99: 724–727 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim H-J, Fonseca JM, Kubota C, Kroggel M, Choi J-H. Quality of fresh-cut tomatoes as affected by salt content in irrigation water and post-processing ultraviolet-C treatment. J. Sci. Food Agr. 88: 1969–1974 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marshall MR, Kim J, Wei C-I. Enzymatic browning in fruit, vegetables and seafoods. Available from: browning. Accessed Oct. 10, 2012.
  30. 30.
    Grigelmo-Miguel N, Rojas-Grau MA, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O. Methods of analysis of antioxidant capacity of phytochemicals. Chemistry, nutritional value, and stability. pp. 271–307. In: Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals. Rosa LA, Alvarez-Parrilla E, González-Aguilar GA (eds). Wiley-Blakwell, Ames, IA, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ruiz-Cruz S, Arvizu-Medrano S. Quality loss of fruit and vegetables induced by microbial growth. Chemistry, nutritional value, and stability. pp. 341–355. In: Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals. Rosa LA, Alvarez-Parrilla E, González-Aguilar GA (eds). Wiley-Blakwell, Ames, IA, USA (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria D. C. Antunes
    • 1
  • Daniela Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Vasilios Pantazis
    • 2
  • Ana M. Cavaco
    • 2
  • Anastasios S. Siomos
    • 3
  • Graça Miguel
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade do Algarve, IBB, Centro de Biotecnologia VegetalFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.CEOTUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations