Ultrasound resistive index, power Doppler, and clinical parameters in established rheumatoid arthritis
- 220 Downloads
Abstract
Ultrasonography (US) is a useful tool for the evaluation of sinovial vascularization and proliferation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Accordingly, resistive index (RI) on spectral Doppler (sD) US provides a quantitative analysis of vascular inflammation, but its utility in the evaluation of RA activity has not been established. Our objective was to determine the association of RI with other US parameters of synovitis and with clinical disease activity in established RA. Patients with positive power Doppler (pD) were included in a prospective cross-sectional study. Disease activity and disability were evaluated using the Disease Activity Score in 28-joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), respectively. Gray scale (GS) synovitis, pD, and sD analyses were performed by one of two examiners in wrists and the second and third metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. The 10-joint GS and 10-joint pD scores and mean RI were then calculated. Weighted kappa (WK) values were employed to assess interobserver reability, and correlations were tested using the Spearman coefficient. Ninety-five RA patients (median duration of disease of 7 years and mean DAS28 of 4.32 ± 1.66) were included. WK values in real-time US were 0.77 for synovitis, 0.87 for pD, and 0.68 for RI. There were no significant correlations of RI with 10-joint GS, 10-joint pD, DAS28, joint counts, or HAQ (P > 0.10 for all tests). Patients in remission had a mean RI similar to those with high disease activity (0.62 ± 0.10, n = 15 versus 0.63 ± 0.13, n = 34, respectively). The addition of the RI score did not seem to improve US performance in patients with established RA.
Keywords
Imaging Imaging—ultrasound Resistive index Rheumatic diseases Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Spectral dopplerNotes
Compliance with ethical standards
The local ethics committee approved the study and all patients signed a written informed consent.
Disclosures
None.
References
- 1.Bone P, Mader R (2013) Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology, 6th ed. Philadelphia, W B Saunders, 1680–1691 pGoogle Scholar
- 2.Firestein GS (2005) Immunologic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 11(3 Suppl):S39–S44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64(3):375–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Schmidt WA (2007) Technology insight: the role of color and power Doppler ultrasonography in rheumatology. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(1):35–42 quiz 59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Bang N, Koenig MJ, Nielsen MB, Bliddal H (2005) Doppler ultrasound findings in healthy wrists and finger joints before and after use of two different contrast agents. Ann Rheum Dis 64(6):824–827CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31(3):315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23(2):137–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bruce B, Fries JF (2005) The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(5 Suppl 39):S14–S18PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.da Luz KR (2012) Prospective evaluation of ultrasound features of wrists and metacarpophalangeal joints in early rheumatoid arthritis. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de São PauloGoogle Scholar
- 10.OMERACT 7 Special Interest Group, Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA et al (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including denitions for ultrasonographic pathology. JRheumatol 32:2485–2487Google Scholar
- 11.Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Stranberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M (2001) The power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 44:2018–2023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Bliddal H (2003) Spectral Doppler and resistive index. A promising tool in ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol 44(6):645–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement 37–46 pGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lainer-Carr D, Brahn E (2007) Angiogenesis inhibition as a therapeutic approach for inflammatory synovitis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(8):434–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Porta F, Radunovic G, Vlad V, Micu MC, Nestorova R, Petranova T et al (2012) The role of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology 51(6):976–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Terslev L, von der Recke P, Torp-Pedersen S, Koenig MJ, Bliddal H (2008) Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35(1):49–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Carotti M, Salaffi F, Morbiducci J, Ciapetti A, Bartolucci L, Gasparini S et al (2012) Colour Doppler ultrasonography evaluation of vascularization in the wrist and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy subjects. Eur J Radiol 81(8):1834–1838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Røgind H, Danneskiold-Samsøe B et al (2003) Effects of treatment with etanercept (Enbrel, TNRF: Fc) on rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 62(2):178–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2003) Estimation of inflammation by Doppler ultrasound: quantitative changes after intra-articular treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62(11):1049–1053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Varsamidis K, Varsamidou E, Tjetjis V, Mavropoulos G (2005) Doppler sonography in assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 31(6):739–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ranjan S, Jahan A, Yadav TP, Sachdev N, Dewan V, Singh S (2014) Evaluation of synovial inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis by power color Doppler and spectral Doppler ultrasonography. Indian J Pediatric 81(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Qvistgaard E, Røgind H, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H (2001) Quantitative ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of inflammation by Doppler technique. Ann Rheum Dis 60(7):690–693CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kiris A, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E, Ardicoglu O (2006) Power Doppler assessment of overall disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Ultrasound 34(1):5–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ozgocmen S, Kiris A, Kocakoc E, Ardicoglu O, Kamanli A (2004) Evaluation of metacarpophalangeal joint synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis by power Doppler technique: relationship between synovial vascularization and periarticular bone mineral density. Joint Bone Spine 71(5):384–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar