Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 723–731 | Cite as

Sex differences in characteristics, utilization, and outcomes of patient undergoing total elbow arthroplasty: a study of the US nationwide inpatient sample

Original Article


The aim of this study was to compare patient characteristics, utilization rates, and outcomes after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) by sex. We used the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998 to 2011 to study sex-related time trends in patient characteristics, comorbidity, and outcomes after TEA. We used chi-squared test, analysis of variance, and the Cochran-Armitage test to assess differences in utilization rates and characteristics over time by sex and logistic regression to compare mortality, discharge disposition, and the length of hospital stay by sex. Overall TEA utilization 0.45 in 1998 to 0.96 per 100,000 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). The utilization rates were significantly higher in females compared to males throughout the study period: 0.62 vs. 0.29 in 1998 (p < 0.0001) and 1.31 vs. 0.70 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Compared to males, females undergoing TEA were more likely to be white (79.7 vs. 71.4 %; p < 0.0001), have rheumatoid arthritis (16.7 vs. 8.1 %; p < 0.0001), and have Deyo-Charlson index of 2 or more (11.3 vs. 5.9 %; p < 0.0001) and were older (63.5 vs. 51.4 years; p < 0.0001). Compared to males undergoing TEA, females had significantly lower mortality, 0.1 vs. 0.4 % (p = 0.03); lower proportion were discharged to home, 81.9 vs. 89.6 % (p < 0.0001), and fewer had has index hospital stay above the median, 30.0 vs. 33.0 % (p = 0.01); most differences were significant after multivariable adjustment. TEA utilization in the USA more than doubled in the last 14 years, with rates higher in females than males. Females had better outcomes after TEA than men. Preoperative risk communication should be sex-specific based on these data.


Discharge Hospital stay Mortality Outcomes Sex TEA Total elbow arthroplasty Utilization 


  1. 1.
    Goldberg VM, Figgie HE 3rd, Inglis AE, Figgie MP (1988) Total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(5):778–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angst F, John M, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Flury M et al (2005) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 53(1):73–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM (2010) Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(8):1115–1120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jenkins PJ, Watts AC, Norwood T, Duckworth AD, Rymaszewski LA, McEachan JE (2013) Total elbow replacement: outcome of 1,146 arthroplasties from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. Acta Orthop 84(2):119–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O (2009) Results after 562 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(3):449–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain NB, Higgins LD, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Katz JN (2006) Trends in the epidemiology of total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States from 1990–2000. Arthritis Rheum 55(4):591–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh JA, Kundukulam J, Riddle DL, Strand V, Tugwell P (2011) Early postoperative mortality following joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 38(7):1507–1513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh JA, Kwoh CK, Richardson D, Chen W, Ibrahim SA (2013) Sex and surgical outcomes and mortality after primary total knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65(7):1095–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR (2012) Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA 308(12):1227–1236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berges IM, Kuo YF, Ostir GV, Granger CV, Graham JE, Ottenbacher KJ (2008) Gender and ethnic differences in rehabilitation outcomes after hip-replacement surgery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87(7):567–572CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berard DM, Vandenkerkhof EG, Harrison M, Tranmer JE (2012) Gender differences in the influence of social support on one-year changes in functional status in older patients with heart failure. Cardiol Res Pract 2012:616372PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell RT, Bennett BK, Gamelli RL (2010) An analysis of social support and insurance on discharge disposition and functional outcomes in patients with acute burns. J burn Care Res 31(3):385–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng TR, Navaie-Waliser M, Feldman PH (2003) Social support, home health service use, and outcomes among four racial-ethnic groups. Gerontologist 43(4):503–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunn TR, Thompson JM, Jackson H, McKnight S, Buckthought G, Gunn AJ (2000) Does early hospital discharge with home support of families with preterm infants affect breastfeeding success? A randomized trial. Acta Paediatr 89(11):1358–1363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perry MA, Hudson S, Ardis K (2011) “If I didn’t have anybody, what would I have done?”: Experiences of older adults and their discharge home after lower limb orthopaedic surgery. J Rehabil Med 43(10):916–922PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibrahim MS, Khan MA, Nizam I, Haddad FS (2013) Peri-operative interventions producing better functional outcomes and enhanced recovery following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review. BMC Med 11:37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jain N, Pietrobon R, Hocker S, Guller U, Shankar A, Higgins LD (2004) The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):496–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E (2004) Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):1909–1916PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, Phillips CB, Mahomed NN, Lew RA et al (2001) Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(11):1622–1629PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medicine ServiceBirmingham VA Medical CenterBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine at the School of Medicine, and Division of Epidemiology at the School of Public HealthUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations