Advertisement

Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 231–237 | Cite as

Color duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries: role in diagnosis and follow-up of suspected cases of temporal arteritis

  • Hisham M. Habib
  • Ashraf A. Essa
  • Ayman A. Hassan
Original Article

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to study the diagnostic value of color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) compared with the clinical results and temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with suspected temporal arteritis (TA) and evaluate the prognostic value of CDU in follow-up of patients of sure diagnosis of TA under treatment in correlation to clinical response. The study included 32 consecutive patients of clinically suspected TA, and 30 age- and gender-matched control subjects. Baseline clinical characteristics and bilateral CDU of temporal arteries were performed to all subjects. CDU aimed to assess presence of a dark halo around the arterial lumen (a halo sign) or presence of stenoses and occlusions of temporal arteries. Unilateral TAB was performed then in all patients but not in control subjects. Subsequent CDU examinations were performed at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after onset of treatment in patients with abnormal CDU. A halo sign at baseline CDU was evident in 13 TA patients (81%) and in 2 non-TA patients (12%) but none in control subjects. The presence of a halo sign in total yielded 81% sensitivity and 88% specificity whereas the presence of bilateral halo sign yielded 37% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Subsequent CDU examinations of TA patients showed disappearance of a halo sign in nine patients at 2 weeks and in four patients at 4 weeks with a mean of disappearance of 21 days after initiation of treatment. CDU is non-invasive, easy, and inexpensive method for diagnosis of TA. It is of higher sensitivity and specificity. It can be used in combination with clinical and laboratory tools for diagnosis of TA. It can effectively predict which patient will need TAB. In patients with bilateral halo sign, TAB is not necessary.

Keywords

Color duplex ultrasonography Temporal arteries Temporal artery biopsy 

Notes

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hunder GG (2006) The early history of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. First descriptions to 1970. Mayo Clin Proc 81(8):1071–83 [Medline]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellmann DB (2004) Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia reheumatica. In: Imboden JB, Hellmann DB, Stone JH (eds) Current rheumatology diagnosis and treatment. Mc Graw Hill, New York, pp 235–241Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatti MT, Tabandeh H (2001) Giant cell arteritis; diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12:393–399. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200112000-00003 [Plumbed]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 33:1122–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ (2003) Giant cell arteritis and polymalgia rheumatic. Ann Intern Med 139:505–515 [PubMed]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall JK, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL, Liu GT et al (2003) The role of unilateral temporal artery biopsy. Ophthalmology 110(3)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ball EL, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Gohil R, Clarke JM (2010) Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. BrJ Surg 97(12):1965–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nesher G, Shemesh D, Mates M, Sonnenblick M, Abrmowitz HBJ (2002) The predictive value of the halo sign in color Doppler ultrasonography of the temporal arteries for diagnosing giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol 29(6):1224–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karahaliou M, Vaiopoulos G, Papaspyrou S, Kankis M et al (2006) Colour duplex sonography of temporal arteries before decision for biopsy: a prospective study in 55 patients with suspected giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Res Thex 8(4):R116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmidt WA (2000) Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:S40–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mari B, Moteagudo M, Bustamantr E, Perez J et al (2009) Analysis of temporal artery biopsies in an 18-years period at a community hospital. Eur J Intern Med 20(5):533–6 [medline]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lie JT (1998) Temporal artery biopsy in diagnosis of giant cell arteritis; lessons from 1109. Biopsies Ant Pathol 1:69–97 [PubMed]Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lauwerys BR, Puttermans T, Houssian FA, Devogelaer JP (1997) Color Doppler sonography of the temporal arteries in giant cell arteritis and polymalgia rheumatica. J Rheumatol 24:1570–1574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinhard M, Schmidt D, Heizel A (2004) Color coded sonography in suspected temporal arteritis—experience after 83 cases. Rheumatol Int 24:340–346. doi: 10.1007/S00296-003-0372-6 [PubMed]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salvarani C, Sillingardi M, Ghiraduzzia A, Lo Scocco G et al (2002) Is duplex ultrasonography useful for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis? Ann Intern Med 137:232–238 [PubMed]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    LeSar CJ, Meier GH, De Masi RJ, Sood J et al (2002) The utility of color duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. J Vasc Surg 36(6):1154–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karassa FB, Matsagas MI, Schmidt WA, Ioannidis JP (2005) Meta-analysis; test performance of ultrasonography for giant cell arteritis. Ann Intern Med 142:352–369 [Pubmed]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arida A, Kyprianou M, Kanakis M, Sfikakis PP (2010) The diagnostic value of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in gaint cell arteritis: a second meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:11–44Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Romera_Villegas A, Villa_Coll R, Poca_Dias V, Cairols_ Castellote MA (2004) The role of color duplex sonography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. J Ultrasound Med 23:1493–1498 [PubMed]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ikard RW (1988) Clinial efficacy of temporal artery biopsy in Nashville, Tennessee. Sounth Med J 81:1222–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salvarani C, Macchioni P, Zizzi F, Moutovaniw W et al (1991) Epidemiological and immunogenetic aspects of polymayalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in Northern Italy. Arthritis Rheum 34:351–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boyer LR, Miller NR, Green WR (1999) Efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral temporal artery biopsies for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophtalmol 128(2):211–5 [Medline]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schnmidt WA, Kraft HE, Borkowski A, Gromnica-Ihle EJ (1999) Color duplex ultrasonography in large vessel giant cell arteritis. Scand J Rheumatol 28:374–376. doi: 10.1080103009749950155373 [PubMed]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hisham M. Habib
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ashraf A. Essa
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ayman A. Hassan
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Rheumatology and RehabilitationMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  2. 2.Rheumatology DepartmentAl Ahsa HospitalAl AhsaKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyBeni Suef UniversityBeni SuefEgypt
  4. 4.Radiology DepartmentAl-Ahsa HospitalAl AhsaKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  5. 5.Department of Vascular SurgeryAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  6. 6.Vascular Surgery DepartmentAl-Ahsa HospitalAl AhsaKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations