Advertisement

Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 30, Issue 11, pp 1447–1454 | Cite as

Outcomes of switching anti-TNF drugs in rheumatoid arthritis—a study based on observational data from the Finnish Register of Biological Treatment (ROB-FIN)

  • Liisa M. Virkki
  • Heikki Valleala
  • Yuya Takakubo
  • Jorma Vuotila
  • Heikki Relas
  • Riitta Komulainen
  • Riitta Koivuniemi
  • Urpo Yli-Kerttula
  • Markku Mali
  • Susanna Sihvonen
  • Maija-Liisa Krogerus
  • Eero Jukka
  • Satu Nyrhinen
  • Yrjö T. Konttinen
  • Dan C. NordströmEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess, based on observational data from the Finnish Register of Biological Treatment, the outcomes of switching an initial tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker to another in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients, who started biological therapy with a TNF blocker between May 1999 and April 2009 and who switched to another TNF blocker, were studied (n = 479). The outcomes were assessed according to the reason for and type of the switch. Outcome assessments included American College of Rheumatology 50 responder index (ACR50) response at 3 months after the switch, treatment duration of the second TNF blocker, and swollen joint counts, CRP and DAS28 score at the 3 months, best and last observations of the first and second TNF blocker, respectively. In those who switched due to lack of effectiveness (LOE), the disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of infliximab or adalimumab, but had increased prior to the switch. Switching to another TNF blocker (etanercept or adalimumab) restored the response initially achieved with the first TNF blocker. The disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of etanercept, and were maintained but not further improved after switching to adalimumab. TNF blocker switching seemed to be most beneficial in secondary LOE (defined as loss of ACR50 response). In those who switched due to adverse events (AE) or other reasons, a similar degree of response as had been achieved with the first agent was also achieved and maintained with the second agent. The results suggest that a second TNF blocker can restore the response in cases of secondary LOE and maintain it after switching due to an AE.

Keywords

Adverse event Biological therapy Lack of effectiveness Rheumatoid arthritis Tumor necrosis factor-alpha 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The data processing and statistical assistance by Dr. Viljami Laine and secretarial assistance by Taina Käyhkö are greatly appreciated. This study has been supported by the Victoria Foundation, the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation, the Waldemar von Frenckell Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Perklen Foundation, the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, the Center of Excellence of the Academy of Finland, ORTON Foundation, EVO grants, and the TBGS National Graduate School of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Biomaterials. The ROB-FIN register has been financially supported by grants from Abbott, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, and Wyeth.

Disclosures

Liisa M. Virkki has received an unrestricted research grant for this study from Wyeth.

References

  1. 1.
    Buch MH, Conaghan PG, Quinn MA, Bingham SJ, Veale D, Emery P (2004) True infliximab resistance in rheumatoid arthritis: a role for lymphotoxin alpha? Ann Rheum Dis 63:1344–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klaasen R, Thurlings RM, Wijbrandts CA, van Kuijk AW, Baeten D, Gerlag DM, Tak PP (2009) The relationship between synovial lymphocyte aggregates and the clinical response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 60:3217–3224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tracey D, Klareskog L, Sasso EH, Salfeld JG, Tak PP (2008) Tumor necrosis factor antagonist mechanisms of action: a comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther 117:244–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mpofu S, Fatima F, Moots RJ (2005) Anti-TNF-alpha therapies: they are all the same (aren’t they?). Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:271–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lutt JR, Deodhar A (2008) Rheumatoid arthritis: strategies in the management of patients showing an inadequate response to TNFalpha antagonists. Drugs 68:591–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Furst DE, Keystone EC, Fleischmann R, Mease P, Breedveld FC, Smolen JS, Kalden JR, Braun J, Bresnihan B, Burmester GR, De Benedetti F, Dörner T, Emery P, Gibofsky A, Kavanaugh A, Kirkham B, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Singer N, Van Riel PL, Weinblatt ME, Weisman MH, Winthrop K (2010) Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2009. Ann Rheum Dis 69(Suppl 1):i2–i29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Vollenhoven R, Harju A, Brannemark S, Klareskog L (2003) Treatment with infliximab (Remicade) when etanercept (Enbrel) has failed or vice versa: data from the STURE registry showing that switching tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers can make sense. Ann Rheum Dis 62:1195–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brocq O, Albert C, Roux C, Gerard D, Breuil V, Ziegler LE (2004) Adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis after failed infliximab and/or etanercept therapy: experience with 18 patients. Joint Bone Spine 71:601–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yazici Y, Erkan D (2004) Do etanercept-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis respond better to infliximab than patients for whom etanercept has failed? Ann Rheum Dis 63:607–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen G, Courvoisier N, Cohen JD, Zaltni S, Sany J, Combe B (2005) The efficiency of switching from infliximab to etanercept and vice-versa in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:795–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wick MC, Ernestam S, Lindblad S, Bratt J, Klareskog L, van Vollenhoven RF (2005) Adalimumab (Humira) restores clinical response in patients with secondary loss of efficacy from infliximab (Remicade) or etanercept (Enbrel): results from the STURE registry at Karolinska University Hospital. Scand J Rheumatol 34:353–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gomez-Reino JJ, Carmona L (2006) Switching TNF antagonists in patients with chronic arthritis: an observational study of 488 patients over a four-year period. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nikas SN, Voulgari PV, Alamanos Y, Papadopoulos CG, Venetsanopoulos AI, Georgiadis AN, Drosos AA (2006) Efficacy and safety of switching from infliximab to adalimumab: a comparative controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 65:257–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Solau-Gervais E, Laxenaire N, Cortet B, Dubucquoi S, Duquesnoy B, Flipo RM (2006) Lack of efficacy of a third tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist after failure of a soluble receptor and a monoclonal antibody. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:1121–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bombardieri S, Ruiz AA, Fardellone P, Geusens P, McKenna F, Unnebrink K, Oezer U, Kary S, Kupper H, Burmester GR, Research in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (ReAct) Study Group (2007) Effectiveness of adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with a history of TNF-antagonist therapy in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buch MH, Bingham SJ, Bejarano V, Bryer D, White J, Reece R, Quinn M, Emery P (2007) Therapy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: outcome of infliximab failures switched to etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 57:448–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Di Poi E, Perin A, Morassi MP, Del Frate M, Ferraccioli GF, De Vita S (2007) Switching to etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with no response to infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:85–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Furst DE, Gaylis N, Bray V, Olech E, Yocum D, Ritter J, Weisman M, Wallace DJ, Crues J, Khanna D, Eckel G, Yeilding N, Callegari P, Visvanathan S, Rojas J, Hegedus R, George L, Mamun K, Gilmer K, Troum O (2007) Open-label, pilot protocol of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switch to infliximab after an incomplete response to etanercept: the opposite study. Ann Rheum Dis 66:893–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hjardem E, Østergaard M, Pødenphant J, Tarp U, Andersen LS, Bing J, Peen E, Lindegaard HM, Ringsdal VS, Rødgaard A, Skøt J, Hansen A, Mogensen HH, Unkerskov J, Hetland ML (2007) Do rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice benefit from switching from infliximab to a second tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor? Ann Rheum Dis 66:1184–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyrich KL, Lunt M, Watson KD, Symmons DP, Silman AJ (2007) Outcomes after switching from one anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to a second anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large UK national cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 56:13–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iannone F, Trotta F, Montecucco C, Giacomelli R, Galeazzi M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Ferri C, Cutolo M, Maria Bambara L, Triolo G, Ferraccioli G, Valentini G, Lapadula G (2007) Etanercept maintains the clinical benefit achieved by infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who discontinued infliximab because of side effects. Ann Rheum Dis 66:249–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karlsson JA, Kristensen LE, Kapetanovic MC, Gülfe A, Saxne T, Geborek P (2008) Treatment response to a second or third TNF-inhibitor in RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blom M, Kievit W, Fransen J, Kuper IH, den Broeder AA, De Gendt CM, Jansen TL, Brus HL, van de Laar MA, van Riel PL (2009) The reason for discontinuation of the first tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agent does not influence the effect of a second TNF blocking agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 36:2171–2177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Conti F, Scrivo R, Spinelli FR, Truglia S, Magrini L, Di Franco M, Ceccarelli F, Valesini G (2009) Outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis switching TNF-alpha antagonists: a single center, observational study over an 8-year period. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27:540–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewé R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, Gaylis N, Murphy FT, Neal JS, Zhou Y, Visvanathan S, Hsia EC, Rahman MU, for the GO-AFTER study investigators (2009) Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet 374:210–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Konttinen L, Honkanen V, Uotila T, Pöllänen J, Waahtera M, Romu M, Puolakka K, Vasala M, Karjalainen A, Luukkainen R, Nordström DC (2006) Biological treatment in rheumatic diseases: results from a longitudinal surveillance: adverse events. Rheumatol Int 26:916–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Konttinen L, Kankaanpää E, Luosujärvi R, Blåfield H, Vuori K, Hakala M, Rantalaiho V, Savolainen E, Uutela T, Nordström D (2006) Effectiveness of anakinra in rheumatic disease in patients naive to biological drugs or previously on TNF blocking drugs: an observational study. Clin Rheumatol 25:882–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nordström DC, Konttinen L, Korpela M, Tiippana-Kinnunen T, Eklund K, Forsberg S, Ilva K, Kaipiainen-Seppänen O, Malmi T, Ylä-Kerttula T, Honkanen V (2006) Classic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in combination with infliximab. The Finnish experience. Rheumatol Int 26:741–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Konttinen L, Tuompo R, Uusitalo T, Luosujärvi R, Laiho K, Lähteenmäki J, Puurtinen-Vilkki M, Lanteri R, Kortelainen S, Karilainen H, Varjolahti-Lehtinen T, Nordström D (2007) Anti-TNF therapy in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: the Finnish experience; ROB-FIN Study Group. Clin Rheumatol 26:1693–1700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Virkki LM, Konttinen YT, Peltomaa R, Suontama K, Saario R, Immonen K, Jäntti J, Tuomiranta T, Nykänen P, Hämeenkorpi R, Heikkilä S, Isomäki P, Nordström D (2008) Cost-effectiveness of infliximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26:1059–1066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Virkki LM, Sumathikutty BC, Aarnio M, Valleala H, Heikkilä R, Kauppi M, Karstila K, Pirilä L, Ekman P, Salomaa S, Romu M, Seppälä J, Niinisalo H, Konttinen YT, Nordström DC (2010) Biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis in clinical practice: outcomes up to 2 years. J Rheumatol 37:2362–2368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hakala M, Hannonen P, Helve T, Korpela M, Mattila K, Möttonen T, Varis T (updated 2009) Rheumatoid arthritis. Current Care guideline 2003. www.kaypahoito.fi. Accessed 14 Apr 2011
  33. 33.
    Haraoui B, Keystone EC, Thorne JC, Pope JE, Chen I, Asare CG, Leff JA (2004) Clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis after switching from infliximab to etanercept. J Rheumatol 31:2356–2359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wolbink GJ, Vis M, Lems W, Voskuyl AE, de Groot E, Nurmohamed MT, Stapel S, Tak PP, Aarden L, Dijkmans B (2006) Development of antiinfliximab antibodies and relationship to clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 54:711–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buch MH, Bingham SJ, Bryer D, Emery P (2007) Long-term infliximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: subsequent outcome of initial responders. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46:1153–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bendtzen K, Geborek P, Svenson M, Larsson L, Kapetanovic MC, Saxne T (2006) Individualized monitoring of drug bioavailability and immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor infliximab. Arthritis Rheum 54:3782–3789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Radstake TR, Svenson M, Eijsbouts AM, van den Hoogen FH, Enevold C, van Riel PL, Bendtzen K (2009) Formation of antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab strongly correlates with functional drug levels and clinical responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1739–1745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van der Bijl AE, Breedveld FC, Antoni CE, Kalden JR, Kary S, Burmester GR, Beckmann C, Unnebrink K, Kupper H (2008) An open-label pilot study of the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and previous infliximab treatment: relationship to reasons for failure and anti-infliximab antibody status. Clin Rheumatol 27:1021–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bartelds GM, Wijbrandts CA, Nurmohamed MT, Stapel S, Lems WF, Aarden L, Dijkmans BA, Tak PP, Wolbink GJ (2007) Clinical response to adalimumab: relationship to anti-adalimumab antibodies and serum adalimumab concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:921–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rozin AP (2004) Infliximab efficiency and failure. Ann Rheum Dis 63:751–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anderson PJ (2005) Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: clinical implications of their different immunogenicity profiles. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34(Suppl 1):19–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bartelds GM, Wijbrandts CA, Nurmohamed MT, Stapel S, Lems WF, Aarden L, Dijkmans BA, Tak PP, Wolbink GJ (2010) Anti-infliximab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in relation to response to adalimumab in infliximab switchers and anti-tumour necrosis factor naive patients: a cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 69:817–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME (2008) When patients with rheumatoid arthritis fail tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: what is the next step? Ann Rheum Dis 67:1497–1498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Villeneuve E, Haraoui B (2010) To switch or to change class—the biologic dilemma in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6:301–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liisa M. Virkki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heikki Valleala
    • 2
  • Yuya Takakubo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jorma Vuotila
    • 4
  • Heikki Relas
    • 2
  • Riitta Komulainen
    • 5
  • Riitta Koivuniemi
    • 2
  • Urpo Yli-Kerttula
    • 6
    • 7
  • Markku Mali
    • 8
  • Susanna Sihvonen
    • 7
    • 9
  • Maija-Liisa Krogerus
    • 10
    • 11
  • Eero Jukka
    • 12
  • Satu Nyrhinen
    • 13
  • Yrjö T. Konttinen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 14
  • Dan C. Nordström
    • 1
    • 2
    • 15
    Email author
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.ORTON Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid FoundationHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Kuusankoski Regional HospitalKouvolaFinland
  5. 5.Riihimäki Regional HospitalRiihimäkiFinland
  6. 6.Seinäjoki Central HospitalSeinäjokiFinland
  7. 7.Tampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  8. 8.Turku University Central HospitalTurkuFinland
  9. 9.Mänttä Regional HospitalMänttäFinland
  10. 10.Lapland Central HospitalRovaniemiFinland
  11. 11.Länsi-Pohja Central HospitalKemiFinland
  12. 12.Rauma Regional HospitalRaumaFinland
  13. 13.Rheumatism Foundation HospitalHeinolaFinland
  14. 14.COXA Hospital for Joint ReplacementTampereFinland
  15. 15.Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations