Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 637–643 | Cite as

Radiographic measurements in the evaluation and classification of elbow joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Kenzo Hashizume
  • Keiichiro Nishida
  • Kazuo Fujiwara
  • Yasutaka Kadota
  • Ryuichi Nakahara
  • Kazuhiko Ezawa
  • Hajime Inoue
  • Toshifumi Ozaki
Original Article

Abstract

We developed two new radiographic parameters—the humeral surface height ratio and ulnar surface height ratio—to precisely detect changes in the bony structure of rheumatoid elbows. Of the 59 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 101 elbows were classified into four types (osteoarthritis, ankylosis, erosive, and resorptive) according to the radiographic appearance. Clinically, osteoarthritis type and ankylosis type were considered to be stable form, and erosive type and resorptive type were unstable form. Patients' clinical data and yearly radiographic changes in the bony structure evaluated by the humeral surface height ratio and ulnar surface height ratio were compared among the four types and between the two forms. There were significant differences between the two forms and among the three types except for the ankylosis type in yearly radiographic changes in the bony structure evaluated by the humeral surface height ratio and ulnar surface height ratio. Stable and unstable forms were distinguished by a cut-off point of 0.65 and 2.58 in yearly radiographic changes in the bony structure evaluated by the humeral surface height ratio and the ulnar surface height ratio, respectively. These parameters might be useful for monitoring the structural changes of the elbow joint in rheumatoid arthritis.

Keywords

Elbow joint Joint destruction pattern Radiographic parameter Rheumatoid arthritis 

Notes

Disclosures

None

References

  1. 1.
    De Seze S, Debeyre N, Djian A, Manual R (1963) The elbow joint. In: Carter ME (ed) International Congress Series. Vol. 61. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, pp 115–123Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laine V, Vainio K (1969) Elbow in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Hijimans W, Paul W, Herschel H (eds) Early synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, pp 112–116Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Porter BB, Richardson C, Vainio K (1974) Rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow: the results of synovectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56:427–437Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flury MP, Herren DB, Simmen BR (1999) Rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. Classification related to the natural course. Clin Orthop 366:72–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simmen BR, Huber H (1992) The rheumatoid wrist: a new classification related to the type of the natural course and its consequences for surgical therapy. In: Simmen BR, Hagena FW (eds) The wrist in rheumatoid arthritis. Karger, Basel, pp 13–25Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wakitani S, Imoto K, Saito M, Murata N, Hirooka A, Yoneda M et al (1999) Evaluation of surgeries for rheumatoid shoulder based on the destruction pattern. J Rheumatol 26(1):41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 18(4):481–491Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larsen A (1995) How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol 22(10):1974–1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steinbrocker O, Traeger CH, Batterman RC (1949) Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Med Assoc 140(8):659–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31(3):315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abe A, Ishikawa H, Murasawa A, Nakazono K (2008) Disease activity and the course of elbow joint deterioration over 10 years in the patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27(7):867–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehtinen J, Kaarela K, Kauppi MJ, Belt EA, Maenpaa HM, Lehto MU (2002) Bone destruction pattern in rheumatoid elbow: a radiographic assessment of 148 elbows at 15 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:253–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ljung P, Jonsson K, Rydholm U (1995) The natural course of rheumatoid elbow arthritis: a radiographic and clinical five-year follow up. J Orthop Rheumatol 8:32–36Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nemoto K, Arino H, Yoshihara Y, Fujikawa K (2004) Arthroscopic synovectomy for the rheumatoid elbow: a short-term outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:652–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kitamura T, Hashimoto J, Murase T, Tomita T, Hattori T, Yoshikawa H et al (2007) Radiographic study of joint destruction patterns in the rheumatoid elbow. Clin Rheumatol 26:515–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alarcon GS, Lopez-Mendez A, Walter J, Boerbooms AM, Russell AS, Furst DE et al (1992) Radiographic evidence of disease progression in methotrexate treated and nonmethotrexate disease modifying antirheumatic drug treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: a meta-analysis. J Rheumatol 19(12):1868–1873PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drosos AA, Tsifetaki N, Tsiakou EK, Timpanidou M, Tsampoulas C, Tatsis CK et al (1997) Influence of methotrexate on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a sixty-month prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 15(3):263–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeurissen ME, Boerbooms AM, van de Putte LB, Doesburg WH, Lemmens AM (1991) Influence of methotrexate and azathioprine on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, double-blind study. Ann Intern Med 114(12):999–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopez-Mendez A, Daniel WW, Reading JC, Ward JR, Alarcon GS (1993) Radiographic assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients enrolled in the cooperative systematic studies of the rheumatic diseases program randomized clinical trial of methotrexate, auranofin, or a combination of the two. Arthritis Rheum 36(10):1364–1369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rau R, Herborn G, Karger T, Werdier D (1991) Retardation of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate therapy. A controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 34(10):1236–1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, Tesser JR, Schiff MH, Keystone EC et al (2000) A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 343(22):1586–1593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, van Vollenhoven R et al (2006) The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 54(1):26–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, Tesser JR, Schiff MH et al (2002) Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 46(6):1443–1450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klareskog L, van der Heijde DM, de Jager JP, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M et al (2004) Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363(9410):675–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR et al (2000) Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 343(22):1594–1602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nishimoto N, Hashimoto J, Miyasaka N, Yamamoto K, Kawai S, Takeuchi T et al (2007) Study of active controlled monotherapy used for rheumatoid arthritis, an IL-6 inhibitor (SAMURAI): evidence of clinical and radiographic benefit from an X ray reader-blinded randomised controlled trial of tocilizumab. Ann Rheum Dis 0:1–6Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smolen J, Han C, Bala M, Maini RN, Kalden JR, van der Heijde DM et al (2005) Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study. Arthritis Rheum 52:1020–1030CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van der Heijde DM, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, Codreanu C, Bolosiu H, Melo-Gomes J et al (2006) Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combinated, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double blind, randomized trial. Arthitis Rheum 54:1063–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Breedveld FC, Emery P, Keystone E, Patel K, Furst DE, Kalden JR et al (2004) Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:149–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van der Heijde DM (1996) Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. Bailliers Clin Rheumatol 10:435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenzo Hashizume
    • 1
  • Keiichiro Nishida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kazuo Fujiwara
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yasutaka Kadota
    • 1
  • Ryuichi Nakahara
    • 1
  • Kazuhiko Ezawa
    • 4
  • Hajime Inoue
    • 5
  • Toshifumi Ozaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOkayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Human MorphologyOkayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal ReconstructionOkayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayamaJapan
  4. 4.Kurashiki Kosai HospitalOkayamaJapan
  5. 5.Kagawa Rosai HospitalKagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations