Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 457–464 | Cite as

A systematic review of homoeopathy for the treatment of fibromyalgia

Review Article

Abstract

Homoeopathy is often advocated for fibromyalgia (FM) and many FM patients use it. To critically evaluate all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of homoeopathy as a treatment for FM, six electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. Data extraction and the assessment of the methodological quality of all included studies were done by two independent reviewers. Four RCTs were found, including two feasibility studies. Three studies were placebo-controlled. None of the trials was without serious flaws. Invariably, their results suggested that homoeopathy was better than the control interventions in alleviating the symptoms of FM. Independent replications are missing. Even though all RCTs suggested results that favour homoeopathy, important caveats exist. Therefore, the effectiveness of homoeopathy as a symptomatic treatment for FM remains unproven.

Keywords

Fibromyalgia Homoeopathy RCT Systematic review 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Pioro-Boisset M, Esdaile JM, Fitzcharles MA (1996) Alternative medicine use in fibromylagia syndrome. Arthritis Care Res 9:13–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breuer GS, Orbach H, Elkayam O, Berkun Y, Paran D, Mates M, Nesher G (2005) Perceived efficacy among patients of various methods of complementary alternative medicine for rheumatologic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(5):693–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hahnemann S. The Organon. 1842 Homeopathic Publications. New DehliGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G (1991) Clinical trials in homeopathy. Br Med J 302:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB (1997) Are the clinical effects of hompeathy placebo effects? A meta-anaylsis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 350:834–843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartay L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne J et al (2005) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 366:726–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook: assessing risk of bias in included studies. Chapter 8 (2008) Accessed at http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/
  10. 10.
    Ezzo J et al (2000) Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 86:217–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher P (1986) An experimental double-blind clinical trial method in homeopathy. Use of a limited range of remedies to treat fibrositis. Br Homeopath J 75(3):142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher P, Greenwood G, Huskisson EC, Turner P, Belon P (1989) Effects of homeopathic treatment on fibrositis (primary fibromyalgia). Br Med J 299:365–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colquhoun D (1990) Re-anaylsis of clinical trial of homeopathic treatment in fibrositis. Lancet 336:441–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bell IR, Lewis DA II, Brooks AJ (2004) Improved clinical status in Fibromyalgia patients treated with individualised homeopathic medicines versus placebo. Rhuematology 43(5):577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell IR, Lewis DA II, Brooks AJ, Schwartz GE, Lewis SE, Caspi O, Scott A et al (2004) Individual differences in response to randomly assigned active individualized homeopathic and placebo treatment in fibromyalgia: implications of a double-blinded optional crossover design. J Altern Complement Med 10(2):269–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Relton C, Smith C, Raw J, Walters C, Adelbajo AO, Thomas KJ, Young TA (2009) Healthcare provided by a homeopath as an adjunct to usual care for Fibromyalgia (FMS): results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Homeopathy 98:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vithoulkas G (1980) The science of homeopathy. B J Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell IR, Lewis DA II, Lewis SE, Schwartz GE, Caspi O, Brooks AJ et al (2003) EEG alpha sensitization in individualized homeopathic treatment of fibromyalgia. Int J Neurosci 114(9):1195–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bell IR, Lewis DA II, Schwartz GE, Lewis SE, Caspi O, Scott A et al (2004) Electroencephalographic cordance patterns distinguish exceptional clinical responders with fibromyalgia to individualized homeopathic medicines. J Altern Complement Med 10(2):285–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook IA, Leutcher A, Morgan M, Witte E, Stubbeman WF, Abrams M et al (2002) Early changes in prefrontal activity characterize clinical responders to antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:120–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Mena I, Dunkin JJ, Cummings JL, Newton TF et al (1994) Assessment of cerebral perfusion using quantitative EEG cordance. Psychiatry Res 55:141–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ernst E, Lee MS (2008) A trial design that generates only "positive" results. J Postgrad Med 54(3):214–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ernst E, Ted J, Kaptchuk MD (1996) Homeopathy revisited. Arch Intern Med 156(19):2162–2164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ernst E, Pittler MH (1997) Alternative therapy bias. Nature 385:480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Complementary MedicinePeninsula Medical SchoolExeterUK

Personalised recommendations