Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 327–331

Diagnosis delay in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: factors and outcomes—an Indian perspective

Brief Report


This study focuses on the causes and consequences of delay in diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Seventy consecutive patients presenting at a rheumatology clinic in India were studied. Mean (±S.D) delay in diagnosis was 6.9 (±5.2) years. The main cause of delay was incorrect diagnosis as non-specific back pain (19/54, 35.1%), degenerative disc disease (14/54, 25.9%), rheumatoid arthritis (11/54, 20.37%), and tuberculosis of spine (9/54, 16.6%) in that order, for which the patient received prolonged treatment. Absence of extra-articular manifestations and juvenile age also significantly correlated with diagnostic delay. Delay in diagnosis resulted in significantly worse disease activity index (BASDAI), functional index (BASFI), and damage index (BASMI). Most incorrect initial diagnoses were made by orthopedicians (75.9%), followed by general physician (50%), and rheumatologist (12%). Continuing medical education workshops with a focus on clinical diagnosis of inflammatory back pain may help in early diagnosis of AS.


Ankylosing spondylitis Asians Diagnosis delay Factors Outcome 


  1. 1.
    Khan MA (2002) Ankylosing spondylitis: introductory comments on its diagnosis and treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 61(Suppl 3):iii3–iii7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dincer U, Cakar E, Kiralp MZ, Dursun H (2008) Diagnosis delay in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: possible reasons and proposals for new diagnostic criteria. Clin Rheumatol 27(4):457–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feldtkeller E, Erlendsson J (2008) Definition of disease duration in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 28(7):693–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Braun J (2003) Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 23(2):61–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Den Bosch F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, Herssens A, de Keyser F, Mielants H et al (2002) Randomized double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 46(3):755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorman JD, Sack KE, Davis JC Jr (2002) Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha. N Engl J Med 346(18):1349–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brandt J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sorensen H, Grassnickel L et al (2003) Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 48(6):1667–1675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Sieper J (2004) Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 63(6):665–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deyo RA, Weinstein JN (2001) Low back pain. N Engl J Med 344(5):363–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moll JM, Wright V (1973) New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A statistical evaluation. Ann Rheum Dis 32(4):354–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oostveen J, Prevo R, den Boer J, van de Laar M (1999) Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 26(9):1953–1958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braun J, Baraliakos X, Golder W, Brandt J, Rudwaleit M, Listing J et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, before and after successful therapy with infliximab: evaluation of a new scoring system. Arthritis Rheum 48(4):1126–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27(4):361–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Bellamy N, Calin A, Dougados M, Khan MA (1999) Which domains should be included in a core set for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis? Introduction to the ankylosing spondylitis module of OMERACT IV. J Rheumatol 26(4):945–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2286–2291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O’Hea J, Mallorie P et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2281–2285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones SD, Porter J, Garrett SL, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Calin A (1995) A new scoring system for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). J Rheumatol 22(8):1609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W et al (2002) Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 359(9313):1187–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baraliakos X, Listing J, von der Recke A et al (2008) The long-term natural course of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis—evaluation of a large AS cohort Scand J Rheumatol 37(123s):33. [Abstract from the 32nd Scandinavian Congress of Rheumatology Jan 30–Feb 3, 2008, held at Levi, Lapland, Finland]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Calin A, Elswood J, Rigg S, Skevington SM (1988) Ankylosing spondylitis—an analytical review of 1500 patients: the changing pattern of disease. J Rheumatol 15(8):1234–1238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malaviya AN (2003) The Feng Pao Hsii lecture: rheumatology in the Asia-Pacific region—unmet needs and challenges. APLAR J Rheumatol 6(1):68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rudwaleit M, Metter A, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J (2006) Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria. Arthritis Rheum 54(2):569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Indian Spinal Injury CenterNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.ISIC Superspeciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations