Advertisement

Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 590–592 | Cite as

Self-report overestimates true height loss: implications for diagnosis of osteoporosis

  • Fraser BirrellEmail author
  • Mark S. Pearce
  • Roger M. Francis
  • Louise Parker
Original Article

Abstract

The Newcastle Thousand Families birth cohort dates from 1947; assessments have included height measurement at 22 and 50 years, when height loss was also assessed by self-report. A total of 388 attended for 50-year review of bone health, of whom 57 reported a median height loss of 2.5 cm, and 8 reported height loss of >3.5 cm. However, of 24 subjects for whom true height loss could be calculated, 7 had gained height, 9 were unchanged and only 8 had lost height since age 22 years. Self-report leads to over-reporting of height loss, and therefore should not be the sole measure of height loss. In clinical practice, objective confirmation of reported height loss should be undertaken, wherever possible, prior to further investigation.

Keywords

Cohort Height loss Osteoporosis Self-report 

References

  1. 1.
    Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P (1982) Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol 115:223–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunnell D, Berney L, Holland P, Maynard M, Blane D, Frankel S, Smith GD (2000) How accurately are height, weight and leg length reported by the elderly, and how closely are they related to measurements recorded in childhood? Int J Epidemiol 29:456–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ (2002) Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 5:561–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parker L, Lamont DW, Unwin N, Pearce MS, Bennett SMA, Dickinson HO et al (2003) A lifecourse study of risk for hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia and obesity (the central metabolic syndrome) at age 49–51 years. Diabet Med 20:406–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) 1: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teshima R, Yamamoto K, Kishimoto H, Morio Y, Hagino H, Maeyama I (1987) Osteoporotic changes in rheumatoid arthritis (in Japanese). Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 61:289–297 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gough AK, Lilley J, Eyre S, Holder RL, Emery P (1994) Generalised bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 344:23–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garton MJ, Reid DM (1993) Bone mineral density of the hip and of the anteroposterior and lateral dimensions of the spine in men with rheumatoid arthritis. Effects of low-dose corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheum 36:222–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dequecker JV, Baeyens JP, Claessens J (1969) The significance of stature as a clinical measurement of ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 17:169–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatmentGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fraser Birrell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark S. Pearce
    • 1
  • Roger M. Francis
    • 1
  • Louise Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RheumatologyUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneFramlington PlaceUK

Personalised recommendations