Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 41–47

Adaptation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity: functional assessment in AS

  • Burcu Yanık
  • Yeşim Kurtaiş Gürsel
  • Şehim Kutlay
  • Saime Ay
  • Atilla Halil Elhan
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) to the Turkish population and investigate the reliability and the validity of the Turkish version. Seventy-six patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were included in the study. The functional status of the patients was assessed by using the adapted Turkish version of the BASFI twice, at recruitment and 24 h later. For validity analysis, patients were also assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) evaluating disease activity, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) indicating effect of the disease on patient’s well-being, physician’s assessment of the disease activity and pain intensity. Spinal mobility was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of the patients were also recorded. The lumbar region and the sacroiliac joints were assessed by Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS) and the hip joints were assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index hip (BASRI-h). The internal consistency was 0.89 (Cronbach’s alpha), which showed a high reliability for the Turkish version of the BASFI. Test-retest reliability was good, with a high intraclass correlation coefficient between the two time points (ICC=0.93). Significant correlations were detected between the BASFI and the BASDAI, BAS-G, doctor’s global assessment, and general pain intensity (r=0.62, p<0.001; r=0.47, p<0.001; r=0.55, p<0.001; r=0.47, p<0.001, respectively). The adaptation of the BASFI to the Turkish population was successful and it was found to be reliable and valid among Turkish patients. Thus, studies using the Turkish BASFI can be compared with international studies.

Keywords

Adaptation Ankylosing spondylitis Functional index Reliability Validity 

References

  1. 1.
    Calin A (1994) Can we define the outcome of ankylosing spondylitis and the effect of physiotherapy management. J Rheumatol 21:184–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cronstedt H, Waldner A, Stenstrom CH (1999) The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. Reliability and validity. Scand J Rheumatol 111 [Suppl]:1–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heikkila S, Viitanen J, Kautiainen H, et al. (2000) Sensitivity to change of mobility tests; effect of short-term intensive physiotherapy and exercise on spinal, hip and shoulder measurements in spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol 27:1251–1256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Heijde D, Bellamy N, Calin A, et al. (1997) Preliminary core sets for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 24:2225–2229Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache J, et al. (1998) Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 15:302–307Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daltroy LH, Larson MG, Roberts WN, et al. (1990) A modification of Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol 17:946–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abbott CA, Helliwell PS, Chamberlein MA (1994) Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol 33:1060–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruof J, Sangha O, Stuckı G (1999) Comparative responsiveness of 3 functional indices in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:1959–1963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viitanen JV, Heikkila S (2001) Functional changes in patients with spondyloarthropathy. A controlled trial of the effects of short-term rehabilitation and 3-year follow up. Rheumatol Int 20:211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heikkila S, Viitanen JV, Kautianen H, et al. (2000) Evaluation of the Finnish version of the functional indices BASFI and DFI in spondyloarthropathy. Clin Rheumatol 19:464–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, et al. (1991) The European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van der Linden SM, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garrett SL, Jenkinson TR, Whitelock HC, et al. (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in AS: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A (1996) The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol 35:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ay S, Kutlay Ş (2003) Ankilozan Spondilitli Hastalarda Bath Ankilozan Spondilit Hastalık Aktivite İndeksinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock H, et al. (1994) Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 21:1694–1698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dawes PT (1999) Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score. J Rheumatol 26:993–996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Calin A, Mackay K, Santos H, et al. (1999) A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index. J Rheumatol 26:988–992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficent alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, p 398Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ruof J, Sangha O, Stucki G (1999) Evaluation of a German version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Dougados Functional Index (D-FI). Z Rheumatol 58:218–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hidding A, van Santen M, De Klerk E, et al. (1994) Comparison between self-report measures and clinical observations of functional disability in ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 21:818–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, Klerk E, et al. (1999) A comparative study of the usefulness of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and Dougados Functional Index in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:961–965PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burcu Yanık
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yeşim Kurtaiş Gürsel
    • 1
  • Şehim Kutlay
    • 1
  • Saime Ay
    • 1
  • Atilla Halil Elhan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineAnkara University AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Çankaya, AnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics, School of MedicineAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations