Advertisement

Abrasiveness evaluation of selected river gravels of Pakistan using LCPC rock abrasivity test

  • M. Z. Abu BakarEmail author
  • Z. Zafar
  • Y. Majeed
Original Paper

Abstract

Abrasivity of rock and soil causes tool wear in excavation or drilling operations, and the presence of sandy gravels stratum also plays a significant role in causing serious damage to the cutting tools. Understanding the wear mechanism is important for the cost estimation and planning of projects. Abrasivity of cobbles and boulders present within soil matrix may vary from negligible in some cases to severe under certain conditions depending upon the volume and characteristics of those cobbles and boulders being encountered. Several methods have been proposed to assess the abrasivity of rock. In the present research, LCPC rock abrasivity tests were performed on 14 gravel samples collected from different river deposits of Pakistan. Practical extensions to the standard LCPC abrasivity test were used and fraction larger than 6.3 mm was incorporated in accordance with the method proposed by Thuro et al. (2007). Moreover, in order to observe the effect of increasing grain size on LCPC abrasivity coefficient (LAC g/t), 3 river gravel samples (out of initially selected 14 samples) were chosen and evaluated along with the computation of brittleness coefficient (LBC, %). Correlations were developed with LAC values of originally rounded grains against crushed/angular grains. XRD analysis was incorporated in order to determine the mineralogical composition of each sample and the possible correlation of LAC (g/t) with abrasive mineral content (AMC, %) for both modes of testing (rounded and crushed samples) were developed. Moreover, the correlations of LAC (g/t) with quartz content, equivalent quartz content, and mass-weighted average Moh’s hardness were also discussed.

Keywords

Abrasivity Tool wear River gravels LCPC abrasivity coefficient Abrasive mineral content 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Higher Education Commision, Pakistan with Grant No. 7396.

References

  1. AFNOR (1990) Granulats – Essai d’abrasivite’et de broyabilité. Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF P 18-579), ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakar MA, Majeed Y, Rostami J (2016) Effects of rock water content on CERCHAR Abrasivity Index. Wear 368:132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2015) Parametric study of soil abrasivity for predicting wear issue in TBM tunneling projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 48:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilgin N, Copur H, Balci C (2012) Effect of replacing disc cutters with chisel tools on performance of a TBM in difficult ground conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 27(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büchi E, Mathier JF, Wyss C (1995) Rock abrasivity – a significant cost factor for mechanical tunneling in loose and hard rock. Tunnel 5(95):38–44Google Scholar
  6. Deketh HJR (1995) Wear of rock cutting tools (Laboratory experiments on the abrasivity of rock). A.A. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Drucker P (2011) Validity of the LCPC abrasivity coefficient through the example of a recent Danube gravel. Geomech Tunnel 4(6):681–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Düllmann J, Alber M, Plinninger RJ (2014) Determining soil abrasiveness by use of index tests versus using intrinsic soil parameters. Geomech Tunnel 7(1):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feinendegen M, Ziegler M (2018) Geomech Tunnel 11(2):113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Festl J (2006) The LCPC test ˗ a possibility to determine soil abrasivity? Bachelor thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  11. Fowell RJ, Abu Bakar MZ (2007) A review of the Cerchar and LCPC rock abrasivity measurement methods. In Proceeding of the 11th Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, pp 155-160Google Scholar
  12. Gharahbagh EA, Rostami J, Ghasemi AR, Tonon F (2011) Review of rock abrasion testing. In Proceeding of the 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium pp 11-141Google Scholar
  13. Gharahbagh EA, Rostami J, Talebi K (2014) Experimental study of the effect of conditioning on abrasive wear and torque requirement of full face tunneling machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 41:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghasemi A (2010) Study of CERCHAR abrasivity index and potential modifications for more consistent measurement of rock abrasion. M.sc. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez C, Arroyo M, Gens A (2015) Wear and abrasivity: observations from EPB drives in mixed soft ˗ rock sections. Geomech Tunnel 8(3):258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamzaban MT, Memarian H, Rostami J (2014) Continuous monitoring of pin tip wear and penetration into rock surface using a new Cerchar abrasivity testing device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:689–701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0397-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashemnejad A, Ghafoori M, Azali ST (2015) Utilizing water, mineralogy and sedimentary properties to predict LCPC abrasivity coefficient. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0799-9
  18. Hashemnejad A, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour G, Tariq Azali S (2012) Effect of geological parameters on soil abrasivity using LCPC machine for predicting LAC. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2(12):71–76Google Scholar
  19. Ho YK, So STC, Lau TMF, Kwok RCM (2015) Abrasiveness of common rocks in Hong Kong. Rock Mech Rock Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0873-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahraman S, Fener M, Käsling H, Thuro K (2016) The influences of textural parameters of grains on the LCPC abrasivity of coarse-grained igneous rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 58:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Käsling H, & Thuro, K. (2010). Determining abrasivity of rock and soil in the laboratory. In 11th IAEG Congress, Auckland, New Zealand 235: 1973-1980Google Scholar
  22. Köhler M, Maidl U, Martak L (2011) Abrasiveness and tool wear in shield tunneling insoil. Geomech Tunnel 4(1):36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labas M, Krepelka F, Ivanicova L (2012) Assessment of abrasiveness for research of rock cutting. Acta Montan Slovaca 1:65–73Google Scholar
  24. Ma H, Yin L, Gong Q, Wang J (2015) TBM tunneling in mixed-face ground: Problems and solutions. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(4):641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Majeed Y, Abu Bakar MZ (2016) Statistical evaluation of CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) measurement methods and dependence on petrographic and mechanical properties of selected rocks of Pakistan. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1341–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mostafaei M, Far AHR, Rastegarnia A (2018) Assessment of the impact of case parameters affecting abrasion and brittleness factors in alluviums of line 2 of theTabriz subway, Iran. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 78:3851–3861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsen B, Dahl F, Raleigh P, Holzhäuser J (2006) Abrasivity of soils in TBM tunneling, Tunnels and Tunnelling International, March pp.36-38Google Scholar
  28. Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J, Raleigh P (2007) New test methodology for estimating the abrasiveness of soils for TBM tunneling. In Proceedings of the RETC pp.104-116Google Scholar
  29. Perez S, Karakus M, Sepulveda E (2015) A preliminary study on the role of acoustic emission on inferring Cerchar abrasivity index of rocks using artificial neural network. Wear 344-345:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plinninger RJ (2002) Klassifizierung und Prognose von Werkzeugverschleiß bei konventionellen Gebirgslösungsverfahren im Festgestein. Münchner Geologische Hefte, Reihe B – Angewandte Geologie 17:147Google Scholar
  31. Plinninger RJ (2010) In: Williams et al (eds) Hardrock abrasivity investigation using the Rock Abrasivity Index (RAI). Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 3445–3452Google Scholar
  32. Rostami J, Ozdemir L, Bruland A, Dahl F (2005) Review of issues related to Cerchar abrasivity testing and their implications on Geotechnical investigations and cutter cost estimates. In Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference (RETC), Seattle, WA, USA, June, 2005, pp.738-751Google Scholar
  33. Rostami J, Gharahbagh EA, Palomino AM, Mosleh M (2012) Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thuro K (2002) Geologisch-felsmechanische Grundlagen der Gebirgslösung im Tunnelbau. Münchner Geologische Hefte, B18. Eigenverlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  35. Thuro K, Käsling H (2009) Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock. Geomech Tunnel 2(2):179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thuro K, Plinninger RJ (2003) Hard rock tunnel boring, cutting, drilling and blasting: rock parameters for excavatability. In proceedings of the 10th ISRM International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Johannesburg, South Africa pp. 1227-1234Google Scholar
  37. Thuro K, Singer J, Käsling H, Bauer M (2006) Soil abrasivity assessment using the LCPC testing device. Felsbau 24:37–45Google Scholar
  38. Thuro K, Singer J, Käsling H, Bauer M (2007) Determining abrasivity with the LCPC test. In Proceedings of the 1st Canada-U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver B.CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tóth Á, Gong Q, Zhao J (2013) Case studies of TBM tunneling performance in rock–soil interface mixed ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uetz H (1986) Abrasion and erosion. Carl Hauser Verlag, München, p 829Google Scholar
  41. Verhoef PNW (1997) Wear of rock cutting tools (Implications for the site investigation of rock dredging projects). A.A. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. West G (1981) A review of rock abrasiveness testing for tunnelling. In Proc. International Symposium on Weak Rock, Tokyo, 21-24 September, PP 585-594Google Scholar
  43. Wilfing L, Käsling H, Goliasch R, Moritz B, Thuro K (2016) Penetration tests at the Koralm Tunnel (KAT2)–The right tool to improve penetration prediction in TBM tunneling? /Penetrationsversuche am Beispiel des Koralmtunnels (KAT2)–Ein Werkzeug zur Verbesserung von Penetrationsprognosen im maschinellen Tunnelbau? Geomech Tunnel 9(3):200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang Y, Wei Y, Zheng X, Su F, Li M, and Li F (2019) "Evaluation of cutting tool wear of earth pressure balance shield in granular soil based on laboratory test." Journal of Testing and Evaluation 47 (2):927-941.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20180402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yarali O, Yasar E, Bacak G, Ranjith PG (2008) A study of rock abrasivity and tool wear in coal measures rocks. Int J Coal Geol 74:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and TechnologyLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations