Advertisement

Engineering behaviour of lime- and waste ceramic dust-stabilized expansive soil under continuous leaching

  • Chukwueloka A.U. OkekeEmail author
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Numerous distresses in pavement structures on chemically stabilized expansive soils have raised considerable debate regarding the long-term performance of lime-stabilized subgrades. Therefore, this paper examines the effects of continuous leaching on the durability of lime- and waste ceramic dust (WCD)-stabilized expansive subgrades. The tests were performed with different percentages of quicklime (3.5, 4.5, 5 and 10%), while the combined effects of lime and WCD were evaluated by adding 1.5% of WCD to the mixtures containing 3.5 and 4.5% lime. Geotechnical tests such as Atterberg limits, compaction and California bearing ratio (CBR), in addition to microstructural and leachate analyses, were used to evaluate the engineering properties of the stabilized soils. The CBR result shows that early strength development occurred in the soils mixed with lime and WCD. However, at longer curing periods, the beneficial effect of lime on the engineering properties of the soil increased with an increase in lime content. Results of the leaching tests show considerable changes in the physicochemical properties of the soil mixtures, while the estimated service life of the stabilized soils increased from 3.4 to 9.2 years, as lime content increased from 3.5 to 10%. Microstructural analysis results reveal that the flocculated nature of the soil fabric and the density of the fibrous cementitious compounds increased with an increase in lime content. This study clearly indicates that electrical conductivity, pH and pore-water cation concentrations can be used in combination with geotechnical tests, to correctly evaluate the durability of lime- and lime-WCD-stabilized expansive soils.

Keywords

Expansive soil Pavement deterioration Lime stabilization Leachate analysis Calcium concentration Electrical conductivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his gratitude to the Covenant University Center for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID), for providing an enabling environment conducive for academic research. Three technical staff of the Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering laboratories of Covenant University (Messrs. I. Ojuawo, K.S. Ayegbo and G. Olimaro), are gratefully acknowledged for their involvement in the laboratory analysis. The author thanks the chief editor and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions on the first draft of this paper.

References

  1. AASHTO G (1993) Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Akpan O (2005) Relationship between road pavement failures, engineering indices and underlying geology in a tropical environment. Glob J Geol Sci 3(2):99–108.  https://doi.org/10.4314/gjgs.v3i2.18717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Mukhtar M, Lasledj A, Alcover JF (2010) Behaviour and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 20°C. Appl Clay Sci 50(2):191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mukhtar M, Khattab S, Alcover JF (2012) Microstructure and geotechnical properties of lime-treated expansive clayey soil. Eng Geol 139:17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. al-Swaidani A, Hammoud I, Meziab A (2016) Effect of adding natural pozzolana on geotechnical properties of lime-stabilized clayey soil. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(5):714–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D1883-16 (2016) Standard test method for California bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA www.astm.org Google Scholar
  7. ASTM D4318-17e1 (2017) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA www.astm.org Google Scholar
  8. ASTM D6276-19 (2019) Standard test method for using pH to estimate the soil-lime proportion requirement for soil stabilization. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA www.astm.org Google Scholar
  9. ASTM D698-12e2 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA www.astm.org Google Scholar
  10. Bell FG (1988) Stabilisation and treatment of clay soils with lime. Part 1-basic principles. Ground Eng 21(1)Google Scholar
  11. Bell FG (1996) Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng Geol 42(4):223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boardman DI, Glendinning S, Rogers CDF (2001) Development of stabilisation and solidification in lime–clay mixes. Geotechnique 51(6):533–543.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.6.533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks RM (2009) Soil stabilization with fly ash and rice husk ash. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 1(3):209–217Google Scholar
  14. BS 1377 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standards Institute, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Buhler RL, Cerato AB (2007) Stabilization of Oklahoma expansive soils using lime and class C fly ash. In: Problematic soils and rocks and in situ characterization (pp. 1-10),  https://doi.org/10.1061/40906(225)1
  16. Cabalar AF, Hassan DI, Abdulnafaa MD (2017) Use of waste ceramic tiles for road pavement subgrade. Road Mater Pavement Des 18(4):882–896.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1194884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charlier R, Hornych P, Sršen M, Hermansson Å, Bjarnason G, Erlingsson S, Pavšič P (2009) Water influence on bearing capacity and pavement performance: field observations. In: Water in road structures (pp. 175-192). Springer, Dordrecht,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8562-8_8
  18. Chittoori BC, Puppala AJ, Wejrungsikul T, Hoyos LR (2013) Experimental studies on stabilized clays at various leaching cycles. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(10):1665–1675.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chittoori BC, Mishra D, Islam KM (2018) Forensic investigations into recurrent pavement heave from underlying expansive soil deposits. Transp Res Rec 0361198118758625.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Consoli NC, Quiñónez Samaniego RA, González LE, Bittar EJ, Cuisinier O (2018) Impact of severe climate conditions on loss of mass, strength, and stiffness of compacted fine-grained soils–Portland cement blends. J Mater Civ Eng 30(8):04018174.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuisinier O, Deneele D (2008) Long-term behaviour of lime-treated expansive soil submitted to cyclic wetting and drying. In: Unsaturated soils: advances in geoengineering: proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Unsaturated Soils, EUNSAT (p. 327).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cuisinier O, Auriol JC, Le Borgne T, Deneele D (2011) Microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of a compacted lime-treated soil. Eng Geol 123(3):187–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. da Conceição Leite F, dos Santos MR, Vasconcelos KL, Bernucci L (2011) Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements. Constr Build Mater 25(6):2972–2979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dafalla M, Shaker AA, Al-Shamrani M (2018) Influence of wetting and drying on swelling parameters and structure performance. J Perform Constr Facil 33(1):04018101.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dash SK, Hussain M (2011) Lime stabilization of soils: reappraisal. J Mater Civ Eng 24(6):707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deneele D, Le Runigo B, Cui YJ, Cuisinier O, Ferber V (2016) Experimental assessment regarding leaching of lime-treated silt. Constr Build Mater 112:1032–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Di Sante M, Fratalocchi E, Mazzieri F, Pasqualini E (2014) Time of reactions in a lime treated clayey soil and influence of curing conditions on its microstructure and behaviour. Appl Clay Sci 99:100–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eades JL, Grim RE (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highw Res Rec 139 http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrr/1966/139/139-005.pdf
  29. El-Rawi NM, Awad AA (1981) Permeability of lime stabilized soils. Transp Eng J ASCE 107(1):25–35Google Scholar
  30. Federal Ministry of Works (2013) Federal Ministry of Works. Highway manual (Part 1): Design. Pavement and Materials Design, vol. 3, 165p.Google Scholar
  31. Garzón E, Cano M, OKelly BC, Sánchez-Soto PJ (2016) Effect of lime on stabilization of phyllite clays. Appl Clay Sci 123:329–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gencel O, Ozel C, Koksal F, Erdogmus E, Martínez-Barrera G, Brostow W (2012) Properties of concrete paving blocks made with waste marble. J Clean Prod 21(1):62–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghobadi MH, Abdilor Y, Babazadeh R (2014) Stabilization of clay soils using lime and effect of pH variations on shear strength parameters. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):611–619.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0563-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guerra I, Vivar I, Llamas B, Juan A, Moran J (2009) Eco-efficient concretes: the effects of using recycled ceramic material from sanitary installations on the mechanical properties of concrete. Waste Manag 29(2):643–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guney Y, Sari D, Cetin M, Tuncan M (2007) Impact of cyclic wetting–drying on swelling behavior of lime-stabilized soil. Build Environ 42(2):681–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halicka A, Ogrodnik P, Zegardlo B (2013) Using ceramic sanitary ware waste as concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 48:295–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hara H, Suetsugu D, Hayashi S, Du YJ (2008) Calcium leaching properties of lime-treated soil by infiltration of tidal river water. In The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.Google Scholar
  38. Horpibulsuk S, Rachan R, Chinkulkijniwat A, Raksachon Y, Suddeepong A (2010) Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay from microstructural considerations. Constr Build Mater 24(10):2011–2021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunter D (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing clay soils. J Geotech Eng 114(2):150–167.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(150) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. James J, Pandian P (2014) A study on the early UCC strength of stabilized soil admixed with industrial waste materials. Int J Earth Sci Eng 7(3):1055–1063Google Scholar
  41. James J, Pandian PK (2017) Role of phosphogypsum and ceramic dust in amending the early strength development of a lime stabilized expansive soil. Int J Sustain Const Eng Technol 7(2):38–49Google Scholar
  42. Jones LD, Jefferson I (2012) Expansive soils. In: Burland J (ed) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering, Geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation, ICE Publishing, vol 1. London, UK, pp 413–441 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/17002/1/C5_expansive_soils_Oct.pdf Google Scholar
  43. Juan A, Medina C, Morán JM, Guerra MI, Aguado PJ, De Rojas MIS, Frías M, Rodríguez O (2010) Re-use of ceramic wastes in construction. In Ceramic Materials. InTech.Google Scholar
  44. Khattab SA, Al-Mukhtar M, Fleureau JM (2007) Long-term stability characteristics of a lime-treated plastic soil. J Mater Civ Eng 19(4):358–366.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:4(358) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Le Runigo B, Cuisinier O, Cui YJ, Ferber V, Deneele D (2009) Impact of initial state on the fabric and permeability of a lime-treated silt under long-term leaching. Can Geotech J 46(11):1243–1257.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lemaire K, Deneele D, Bonnet S, Legret M (2013) Effects of lime and cement treatment on the physicochemical, microstructural and mechanical characteristics of a plastic silt. Eng Geol 166:255–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Locat J, Bérubé MA, Choquette M (1990) Laboratory investigations on the lime stabilization of sensitive clays: shear strength development. Can Geotech J 27(3):294–304.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCallister LD (1991) The effects of leaching on lime-treated expensive clays. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, 417p.Google Scholar
  49. McCallister LD, Petry TM (1991) Physical property changes in a lime-treated expansive clay caused by leaching. Transp Res Rec 1295Google Scholar
  50. McCallister LD, Petry TM (1992) Leach tests on lime-treated clays. Geotech Test J 15(2):106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10232J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCarthy MJ, Csetenyi LJ, Sachdeva A, Dhir RK (2014) Engineering and durability properties of fly ash treated lime-stabilised sulphate-bearing soils. Eng Geol 174:139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Medina C, Frías M, De Rojas MS (2012) Microstructure and properties of recycled concretes using ceramic sanitary ware industry waste as coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater 31:112–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moghal AAB, Obaid AAK, Al-Refeai TO, Al-Shamrani MA (2014) Compressibility and durability characteristics of lime treated expansive semiarid soils. J Test Eval 43(2):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mousavi SE, Karamvand A (2017) Assessment of strength development in stabilized soil with CBR PLUS and silica sand. J Traffic Transport Eng (English Edition) 4(4):412–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2017.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Obuzor GN, Kinuthia JM, Robinson RB (2012) Soil stabilisation with lime-activated-GGBS—a mitigation to flooding effects on road structural layers/embankments constructed on floodplains. Eng Geol 151:112–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ojuri OO, Adavi AA, Oluwatuyi OE (2017) Geotechnical and environmental evaluation of lime–cement stabilized soil–mine tailing mixtures for highway construction. Transportation Geotechnics 10:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ossa A, García JL, Botero E (2016) Use of recycled construction and demolition waste (CDW) aggregates: a sustainable alternative for the pavement construction industry. J Clean Prod 135:379–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oti JE, Kinuthia JM, Bai J (2009) Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of unfired clay masonry bricks. Eng Geol 109(3-4):230–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Penteado CSG, de Carvalho EV, Lintz RCC (2016) Reusing ceramic tile polishing waste in paving block manufacturing. J Clean Prod 112:514–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pereira-de-Oliveira LA, Castro-Gomes JP, Santos PM (2012) The potential pozzolanic activity of glass and red-clay ceramic waste as cement mortars components. Constr Build Mater 31:197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Phani Kumar BR, Sharma RS (2004) Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 130(7):764–767.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(764) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. PPC Lime Limited (2017) Lime product data sheet. https://www.ppc.co.za/media/20175/Lime-Product-Data-Sheets.pdf
  63. Rao SM, Shivananda P (2005) Role of curing temperature in progress of lime-soil reactions. Geotech Geol Eng 23(1):79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-003-3157-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rao SM, Thyagaraj T (2003) Lime slurry stabilisation of an expansive soil. Proc Instit Civil Eng Geotech Eng 156(3):139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2003.156.3.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sabat AK (2012) Stabilization of expansive soil using waste ceramic dust. Electron J Geotech Eng 17(Z):3915–3926Google Scholar
  66. Seco A, Ramírez F, Miqueleiz L, García B (2011) Stabilization of expansive soils for use in construction. Appl Clay Sci 51(3):348–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Senthamarai RM, Manoharan PD (2005) Concrete with ceramic waste aggregate. Cem Concr Compos 27(9-10):910–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sherwood P (1993) Soil stabilization with cement and lime. State of the art review, Transport Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  69. Sivapullaiah PV, Sridharan A, Ramesh HN (2000) Strength behaviour of lime-treated soils in the presence of sulphate. Can Geotech J 37(6):1358–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stoltz G, Cuisinier O, Masrouri F (2014) Weathering of a lime-treated clayey soil by drying and wetting cycles. Eng Geol 181:281–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Villar-Cociña E, Valencia-Morales E, Gonzalez-Rodrıguez R, Hernandez-Ruız J (2003) Kinetics of the pozzolanic reaction between lime and sugar cane straw ash by electrical conductivity measurement: a kinetic–diffusive model. Cem Concr Res 33(4):517–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00998-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations