Advertisement

Large-scale shaking table model test on seismic performance of bridge-pile-foundation slope with anti-sliding piles: a case study

  • Chonglei Zhang
  • Guanlu JiangEmail author
  • Lijun Su
  • Da Lei
  • Weiming Liu
  • Zhimeng Wang
Original Paper
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to illustrate the seismic performances of anti-slide pile-reinforced bridge foundations in landslides. Based on the anti-slide reinforcement project at Yousuotun along the Chengdu-Lanzhou high-speed railway under construction, shaking table tests were performed on a double-row anti-slide pile-reinforced bridge foundation and landslide model with a 1:40 similitude ratio. Given that the similitude law was satisfied, seismic waves with different frequencies and acceleration amplitudes were input as base excitations to monitor the responses of dynamic parameters: slope acceleration, earth pressure, and pile strain. The amplification effect of peak ground acceleration (PGA) was analyzed. The landslide thrust distribution characteristics and slope response processes were further studied to verify the seismic design of such bridge foundations in landslide-prone areas. The response acceleration of the slope subjected to seismic loads showed a nonlinear amplification “elevation effect”, “surface effect”, and “geological structure effect”. When the distance between the bridge foundation and the back-row anti-slide pile was small, the pier maintained a relatively large PGA amplification factor and was subjected to strong seismic loads. The landslide thrust was mainly borne by the upper part of the back-row anti-slide piles as its distribution changed from spoon-shaped to bow-shaped. Under high-intensity earthquake events, the load-bearing section of the bridge foundation should be strengthened at the sliding surface. Anti-slide piles can effectively limit the dynamic response of the landslide and weaken the seismic response of the slope. The results of testing this reinforcement are the first results proving that the seismic design of reinforced bridge foundations with anti-slide piles can be reliable.

Keywords

Anti-slide piles Shaking table model Peak ground acceleration Bridge pile foundation Seismic response 

Notes

Funding information

This study has been financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51808542, 41761144077), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Grant No. 2019364).

References

  1. Al-Defae AH, Knappett JA (2014) Centrifuge modeling of the seismic performance of pile-reinforced slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron 140(6):04014014.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Gt.1943-5606.0001105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DG, Martin GR, Lam I, Wang JN (2009) Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 611. Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
  3. Brara A, Klepaczko JR (2007) Fracture energy of concrete at high loading rates in tension. Int J Impact Eng 34(3):424–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan AJ, Madabhushi SPG (2009) Amplification of seismic accelerations at slope crests. Can Geotech J 46(5):585–594.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan AJ, Thusyanthan NI, Madabhushi SP (2005) Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(12):1488–1497.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chigira M, Wu XY, Inokuchi T, Wang GH (2010) Landslides induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Geomorphology 118(3-4):225–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chotesuwan A, Mutsuyoshi H, Maki T (2012) Seismic behavior of bridges with pier and foundation strengthening: PsD tests and analytical study. Earthq Eng Struct D 41(2):279–294.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui P, Zhu YY, Han YS, Chen XQ, Zhuang JQ (2009) The 12 May Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide lakes: distribution and preliminary risk evaluation. Landslides 6(3):209–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0160-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du Y, Yuan C, Wang Y, Tao Y-J (2012) Major geological hazard and geological alignment of Chengdu-Lanzhou railway. J Railway Eng Soc 8:11–15 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Ellis EA, Durrani IK, Reddish DJ (2010) Numerical modelling of discrete pile rows for slope stability and generic guidance for design. Geotechnique 60(3):185–195.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.7.00090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang YS, Chen TJ, Holtz RD, Lee WF (2003) Reduction of boundary friction in model tests. Geotech Test J 27(1):3–12  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10812 Google Scholar
  12. GB18306-2001 (2001) Seismic ground motion parameter zonation map of China.Google Scholar
  13. Gorum T, Fan XM, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang GH (2011) Distribution pattern of earthquake-induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology 133(3-4):152–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haeri SM, Kavand A, Rahmani I, Torabi H (2012) Response of a group of piles to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading by large scale shake table testing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 38:25–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han Q, Du XL, Liu JB, Li ZX, Li LY, Zhao JF (2009) Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(2):263–273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8162-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashash YM, Dashti S, Romero MI, Ghayoomi M, Musgrove M (2015) Evaluation of 1-D seismic site response modeling of sand using centrifuge experiments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 78:19–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashash YM, Park D (2002) Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(7):611–624.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00042-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobiger M, Wegler U, Shiomi K, Nakahara H (2012) Coseismic and postseismic elastic wave velocity variations caused by the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake, Japan. J Geophys Res-Sol Earth 117(B9).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009402
  19. Huang F, Li M, Ma Y, Han Y, Tian L, Yan W, Li X (2017) Studies on earthquake precursors in China: a review for recent 50 years. Geodesy Geodyn 8(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2016.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang RQ, Li YR, Qu K, Wang K (2013) Engineering geological assessment for route selection of railway line in geologically active area: a case study in China. J Mt Sci-Engl 10(4):495–508.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2660-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hubbard J, Shaw JH (2009) Uplift of the Longmen Shan and Tibetan plateau, and the 2008 Wenchuan (M=7.9) earthquake. Nature 458(7235):194–197.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang H, Jernigan JB, Lin YW (2000) Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems. J Bridg Eng 5(4):322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iai S (1989) Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field. Soils Found 29(1):105–118.  https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. JGJ94-2008 (2008) Technical code for building pile foundations. China Architecture and Building Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanagasabai S, Smethurst JA, Powrie W (2011) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of discrete piles used to stabilize landslides. Can Geotech J 48(9):1393–1411.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T11-046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kobayashi H, Tamura K, Tanimoto S (2002) Hybrid vibration experiments with a bridge foundation system model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9-12):1135–1141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00140-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kowalsky MJ (2000) Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng-Asce 126(8):869–878.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)0733-9445(2000)126:8(869) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee DH, Choi E, Zi G (2005) Evaluation of earthquake deformation and performance for RC bridge piers. Eng Struct 27(10):1451–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li JZ, Yan JK, Peng TB, Han L (2014) Shake table studies of seismic structural systems of a Taizhou Changjiang highway bridge model. J Bridg Eng 20(3):04014065.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li JZ, Peng TB, Xu Y (2008) Damage investigation of girder bridges under the Wenchuan earthquake and corresponding seismic design recommendations. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7(4):337–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1005-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li LQ, Ju NP, Zhang S, Deng XX, Sheng DC (2019) Seismic wave propagation characteristic and its effects on the failure of steep jointed anti-dip rock slope. Landslides 16:105–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1071-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin CH, Li HH, Weng MC (2018) Discrete element simulation of the dynamic response of a dip slope under shaking table tests. Eng Geol 243:168–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin ML, Wang KL (2006) Seismic slope behavior in a large-scale shaking table model test. Eng Geol 86(2-3):118–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lirer S (2012) Landslide stabilizing piles: experimental evidences and numerical interpretation. Eng Geol 149:70–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu J, Liu FH, Kong XJ, Yu L (2016) Large-scale shaking table model tests on seismically induced failure of concrete-faced rockfill dams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 82:11–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma N, Wu HG, Ma HM, Wu XY, Wang GH (2019) Examining dynamic soil pressures and the effectiveness of different pile structures inside reinforced slopes using shaking table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 116:293–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Medel-Vera C, Ji TJ (2016) A stochastic ground motion accelerogram model for Northwest Europe. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 82:170–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nian TK, Jiang JC, Wang FW, Yang Q, Luan MT (2016) Seismic stability analysis of slope reinforced with a row of piles. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 84:83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pal S, Kaynia AM, Bhasin RK, Paul DK (2012) Earthquake stability analysis of rock slopes: a case study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(2):205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0145-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pastor M, Haddad B, Sorbino G, Cuomo S, Drempetic V (2009) A depth-integrated, coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phenomena. Int J Numer Anal Met 33(2):143–172.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rong MS, Wang ZM, Woolery EW, Lyu YJ, Li XJ, Li SY (2016) Nonlinear site response from the strong ground-motion recordings in western China. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 82:99–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roten D, Fäh D, Bonilla LF (2013) High-frequency ground motion amplification during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake explained by soil dilatancy. Geophsy J Int 193(2):898–904.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi ZM, Wang YQ, Peng M, Chen JF, Yuan J (2015) Characteristics of the landslide dams induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and dynamic behavior analysis using large-scale shaking table tests. Eng Geol 194:25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Srilatha N, Latha GM, Puttappa CG (2013) Effect of frequency on seismic response of reinforced soil slopes in shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 36:27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun H, Niu FJ, Zhang KJ, Ge XR (2017) Seismic behaviors of soil slope in permafrost regions using a large-scale shaking table. Landslides 14(4):1513–1520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0823-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun ZL, Kong LW, Guo AG, Tian H (2015) Effects of stress ratio and moisture condition of loose deposits on their dynamic parameters and ground response spectrum. Rock Soil Mech 36(10):2765–2772.  https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2015.10.004 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tang L, Ling XZ, Xu PJ, Gao X, Wang DS (2010) Shake table test of soil-pile groups-bridge structure interaction in liquefiable ground. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 9(1):39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8131-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. TB10002.5-2005 (2005) Code for design on subsoil and foundation of railway bridge and culvert. China Railway Press, Beijing, pp 25–102Google Scholar
  49. Torisu SS, Sato J, Towhata I, Honda T (2010) 1-G model tests and hollow cylindrical torsional shear experiments on seismic residual displacements of fill dams from the viewpoint of seismic performance-based design. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(6):423–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang FW, Cheng QG, Highland L, Miyajima M, Wang HB, Yan CG (2009) Preliminary investigation of some large landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan Province, China. Landslides 6(1):47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0141-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang KL, Lin ML (2011) Initiation and displacement of landslide induced by earthquake-a study of shaking table model slope test. Eng Geol 122(1-2):106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wasowski J, Keefer DK, Lee CT (2011) Toward the next generation of research on earthquake-induced landslides: current issues and future challenges. Eng Geol 122(1-2):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu G, Yao L, Gao Z, Li Z (2008) Large-scale shaking table model test study on dynamic characteristics and dynamic responses of slope. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(3):624–632 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  54. Xu Q, Fan XM, Huang RQ, Van Westen C (2009) Landslide dams triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake, Sichuan Province, south west China. B Eng Geol Environ 68(3):373–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0214-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu Q, Liu H, Zou W, Fan X, Chen J (2010) Large-scale shaking table test study of acceleration dynamic responses characteristics of slopes. Chin Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(12):2420–2428 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Yin YP, Li B, Wang WP (2015) Dynamic analysis of the stabilized Wangjiayan landslide in the Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake and aftershocks. Landslides 12(3):537–547.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0497-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yu YZ, Deng LJ, Sun X, Lu H (2010) Centrifuge modeling of dynamic behavior of pile-reinforced slopes during earthquakes. J Cent South Univ T 17(5):1070–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0599-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuan LJ, Liu XS, Wang XG, Yang YS, Yang ZQ (2014) Seismic performance of earth-core and concrete-faced rock-fill dams by large-scale shaking table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 56:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang JQ, Qu HL, Liao Y, Ma YX (2012) Seismic damage of earth structures of road engineering in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Environ Earth Sci 65(4):987–993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1519-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang ZL, Wang T, Wu SR, Tang HM, Liang CY (2017) Investigation of dormant landslides in earthquake conditions using a physical model. Landslides 14(3):1181–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0813-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.MOE Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, School of Civil EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  4. 4.China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. LtdChengduChina

Personalised recommendations