Advertisement

Mapping the susceptibility of rainfall and earthquake triggered landslides along China–Nepal highways

  • Kaushal Raj Gnyawali
  • Yonghong ZhangEmail author
  • Guojie Wang
  • Lijuan Miao
  • Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
  • Basanta Raj Adhikari
  • Liming Xiao
Case history

Abstract

The 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Mw = 7.8) caused significant earthquake triggered landslides (ETL) in a landscape that is heavily intervened by rainfall triggered landslides (RTL). China’s Belt and Road Initiative plan to boost South-Asian regional trade and mobility through two key highway corridors, i.e. 1) Longmu–Rasuwa–Kathmandu (LRK) and 2) Nyalam–Tatopani–Kathmandu (NTK) route, that dissect the Himalayas through this geologically unstable region. To understand the spatial characteristics and susceptibility of these ETL and RTL, we delineate the landslides by means of time variant satellite imageries, assess their spatial distribution and model their susceptibilities along the highway slopes. We use a coupled frequency ratio (FR) – analytical hierarchy process (AHP) model by considering nine landslide determinants, e.g. geomorphic type (slope, aspect, curvature, elevation), hydrologic type (erosive potential of gullies, i.e. stream power index and distance to streams), normalized difference vegetation index, lithology and civil structure type (i.e. distance to roads). The results demonstrate that elevation and slope predominantly control both these landslide occurrences. The model predicts locations of ETL with higher accuracy than RTL. On comparison, NTK was safer with 133.5 km2 of high RTL or ETL (or both) landslide susceptible areas, whereas LRK has 216.04 km2. For mapping the extent of these landslides, we constricted it to the slope units of highways to reduce the computational effort, but this technique successfully achieved an acceptable threefold average model prediction rate of 82.75% in ETL and 77.9% in RTL. These landslide susceptibility maps and route comparisons would provide guidance towards further planning, monitoring, and implementing landslide risk mitigation measures for the governments.

Keywords

Landslides susceptibility Analytical hierarchy process Gorkha earthquake China Nepal Highways 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41661144039) and the Key Project of National Social and Scientific Fund Program (No. 16ZDA047).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adhikari L, Gautam U, Koirala B et al (2015) The aftershock sequence of the 2015 April 25 Gorkha–Nepal earthquake. Geophys J Int 203:2119–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvioli M, Marchesini I, Reichenbach P et al (2016) Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling. Geosci Model Dev 9:3975–3991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ba Q, Chen Y, Deng S et al (2018) A comparison of slope units and grid cells as mapping units for landslide susceptibility assessment. Earth Sci Inf 11:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai S, Cheng C, Wang J et al (2013) Regional scale rainfall- and earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility assessment in Wudu County, China. J Mt Sci 10:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beazley RE, Lassoie JP (2017) The future of himalayan mobilities. In: Beazley RE, Lassoie JP (eds) Himalayan mobilities: an exploration of the impact of expanding rural road networks on social and ecological systems in the Nepalese Himalaya. Springer, Cham, pp 125–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camilo DC, Lombardo L, Mai PM et al (2017) Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized generalized linear model. Environ Model Softw 97:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, BD, Jibson RW (2015) Assessment of existing and potential landslide hazards resulting from the April 25, 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake sequence (ver. 1.1, August 2015). US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015 1142:50Google Scholar
  9. Cooke R, Doornkamp JC (1990) Geomorphology in environmental management: a new introduction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P et al (2013) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209Google Scholar
  11. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S (2008) Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides in the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Bhandary N et al (2010) Low-cost road for the development of Nepal and its engineering geological consequences. Geologically Active, Proceedings of the 11th IAEG Congress, pp 4085–4094Google Scholar
  13. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A et al (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the north Anatolian fault zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65:1481–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dongtao M, Jianjun T, Peng C, Ruren L (2004) Approach to mountain hazards in Tibet, China. J Mt Sci 1:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, Van Asch TWJ (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning of north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erener A, Düzgün HSB (2010) Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of more and Romsdal (Norway). Landslides 7:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C et al (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallen SF, Clark MK, Godt JW (2015) Coseismic landslides reveal near-surface rock strength in a high-relief, tectonically active setting. Geology 43:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gnyawali KR, Adhikari BR (2017) Spatial relations of earthquake induced landslides triggered by 2015 Gorkha earthquake mw = 7.8. In: advancing culture of living with landslides. Springer , Cham, pp 85–93Google Scholar
  21. Goda K, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM et al (2015) The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: insights from earthquake damage survey. Front Built Environ 1:1–15Google Scholar
  22. Guzzetti F (2006) Landslide hazard and risk assessment. PhD Thesis, University of BonnGoogle Scholar
  23. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M et al (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hashash Y, Tiwari B, Moss RE et al (2015) Geotechnical field reconnaissance: Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake of April 25 2015 and related shaking sequence. GEER Association Report No. GEER-040, pp 1–250Google Scholar
  25. Hearn GJ, Shakya NM (2017) Engineering challenges for sustainable road access in the Himalayas. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 50:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Himalayan News Service (2018) Tatopani border point likely to reopen soon. The Himalayan Times, KavreGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaboyedoff M, Leibundgut G, Penna I, et al (2015) Characterization of the jure (Sindhupalchok, Nepal) landslide by TLS and field investigations. EGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  28. Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, West Nepal. Comput Geosci 52:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lavé J, Avouac JP (2000) Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of Central Nepal. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 105:5735–5770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lavé J, Avouac JP (2001) Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of Central Nepal. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 106:26561–26591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Y, Chen G, Tang C et al (2012) Rainfall and earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and artificial neural network. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2719–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lombardo L, Mai PM (2018) Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Eng Geol 244:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marc O, Behling R, Andermann C et al (2019) Long-term erosion of the Nepal Himalayas by bedrock landsliding: the role of monsoons, earthquakes and giant landslides. Earth Surf Dynam 7:107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marc O, Hovius N, Meunier P et al (2016) A seismologically consistent expression for the total area and volume of earthquake-triggered landsliding. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf 121:640–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McAdoo BG, Quak M, Gnyawali KR et al (2018) Roads and landslides in Nepal: how development affects environmental risk. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:3203–3210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mencin D, Bendick R, Upreti BN et al (2016) Himalayan strain reservoir inferred from limited afterslip following the Gorkha earthquake. Nat Geosci 9:533–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meunier P, Hovius N, Haines AJ (2007) Regional patterns of earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031337
  38. Meunier P, Hovius N, Haines JA (2008) Topographic site effects and the location of earthquake induced landslides. Earth Planet Sci Lett 275:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mugnier J-L, Jouanne F, Bhattarai R et al (2017) Segmentation of the Himalayan megathrust around the Gorkha earthquake (25 April 2015) in Nepal. J Asian Earth Sci 141:236–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Myronidis D, Papageorgiou C, Theophanous S (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards 81:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petley DN, Hearn GJ, Hart A et al (2007) Trends in landslide occurrence in Nepal. Nat Hazards 43:23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R et al (2014) Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:95–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pradhan AMS, Kim YT (2016) Evaluation of a combined spatial multi-criteria evaluation model and deterministic model for landslide susceptibility mapping. CATENA 140:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rana PB, Karmacharya B (2016) Nepal: a connectivity-driven development strategy. Connecting asia-infrastructure for integrating south and southeast asia. Edward, Cheltenham, pp 330–358Google Scholar
  45. Roback K, Clark MK, West AJ et al (2018) The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Geomorphology 301:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  47. Saaty TL (2005) Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  48. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian Y, Xu C, Chen J, Hong H (2016) Spatial distribution and susceptibility analyses of pre-earthquake and coseismic landslides related to the Ms 6.5 earthquake of 2014 in Ludian, Yunan, China. Geocarto Int 32:978–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsou C-Y, Chigira M, Higaki D et al (2018) Topographic and geologic controls on landslides induced by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake and its aftershocks: an example from the Trishuli Valley, Central Nepal. Landslides 15:953–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wandrey CJ, Law BE (1998) Geologic map of southasia (geo8ag). Central Energy Resources Team, United States Geological Survey, DenverGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang F, Xu P, Wang C et al (2017) Application of a GIS-based slope unit method for landslide susceptibility mapping along the Longzi River, southeastern Tibetan plateau, China. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6:172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu C, Tian Y, Zhou B et al (2017) Landslide damage along Araniko highway and Pasang Lhamu highway and regional assessment of landslide hazard related to the Gorkha, Nepal earthquake of 25 April 2015. Geoenviron Disast 4:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zêzere JL, de Brum FA, Rodrigues ML (1999) The role of conditioning and triggering factors in the occurrence of landslides: a case study in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Geomorphology 30:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang J, van Westen CJ, Tanyas H, et al (2018) How size and trigger matter: analyzing rainfall- and earthquake-triggered landslide inventories and their causal relation in the Koshi River basin, central Himalaya. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-109Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaushal Raj Gnyawali
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yonghong Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guojie Wang
    • 1
  • Lijuan Miao
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
    • 4
  • Basanta Raj Adhikari
    • 5
    • 6
  • Liming Xiao
    • 7
  1. 1.School of Geographical SciencesNanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST)NanjingChina
  2. 2.Natural Hazards SectionHimalayan Risk Research Institute (HRI)BhaktapurNepal
  3. 3.Department of Structural Development of Farms and Rural AreasLeibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO)HalleGermany
  4. 4.Department of Ocean EngineeringPukyong National UniversityBusanSouth Korea
  5. 5.Institute for Disaster Management and ReconstructionSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  6. 6.Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of EngineeringTribhuvan UniversityKathmanduNepal
  7. 7.Department of Information and CommunicationNanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST)NanjingChina

Personalised recommendations