Advertisement

Investigation of engineering properties for usability of Lefke stone (Osmaneli/Bilecik) as building stone

  • H. Haluk Selim
  • Ahmet KarakaşEmail author
  • Özkan Coruk
Original Paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Lefke stone is a sandstone that has been widely used in mosques, madrasas, churches, and houses as building stone. The geological features and engineering properties of Lefke stone outcropped in the southern part of Osmaneli/Bilecik were investigated in field and laboratory studies. Samples acquired during the fieldwork were tested to determine the physical, mechanical, durability, and hygrothermal properties in the laboratory. The mean physico-mechanical properties of Lefke stone yielded apparent density of 2.38 g/cm3, specific gravity of 2.68 g/cm3, total porosity of 11.26%, 2.93% water absorption by weight, uniaxial compressive strength of 94 MPa, flexure strength of 11.45 MPa, a 3.90 MPa point load strength, 4.5–5 Mohs hardness, and field Schmidt hammer rebound value of 36. According to durability tests, Lefke stone is resistant to CaCl2 salt mist but has low resistance to SO2 aging. Salt crystals placed in the discontinuities of the rock caused slight crack growth. The stone’s resistance to crystallization of sodium sulphate salt is low, and an increase in the volume of salts crystallized in the rock results in low corner strengths. A capillary water-absorption value of 0.0016 kg/m2.h places Lefke stone into the category of very low water absorption capacity and permeability. The water vapor diffusion resistance factor (μ) less than 1 indicates that the sandstone has high breathability. Its performance in historical buildings, field observations, and values obtained through laboratory tests confirm that Lefke sandstone can be used as a building stone.

Keywords

Lefke stone Building stone Sandstone Engineering properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Istanbul Commerce University YAPKO unit for financing the project (grant number 2017/16-024), the Osmaneli (Bilecik) Municipality for logistical support during the fieldwork, and ITU-GAL and AKU-NSL laboratories.

References

  1. Anon (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping part I: rock and soil materials. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 19:364–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM C616/C616M (2015) Standard specification for quartz-based dimension stone. American Standards for Testing Materials. ASTM International, 2pGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM D5550-06 (2006) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by gas pycnometer. ASTM International, p 5pGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D5731-16 (2016) Standard test method for determination of the point load strength index of rock and application to rock strength classifications. ASTM International, p 11pGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM D5873-14 (2014) Standard test method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hammer method. ASTM International, 6pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bieniawski ZT (1975) The point-load test in geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(75)90024-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Çelik MY (2003) Types and usage areas of the decorative natural building stones. Sci Min J 42(1):3–15Google Scholar
  8. Çobanoğlu I, Çelik SB (2017) Assessments on the usability of wide wheel (capon) test as reference abrasion test method for building stones. Constr Build Mater 151:319–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper B, Kramer S (2014) Sydney sandstone: heritage stone from Australia. EGU general assembly conference abstracts, 16:16465Google Scholar
  10. Crocq CS (2010) Building stone in Alberta; energy resources conservation board. ERCB/AGS open file report, Canada, 52pGoogle Scholar
  11. De Beer JH (1968) Subjective classification of the hardness of rocks and the associated shear strength. Proceedings of the fourth regional conference for Africa, introducer, Cape Town, South Africa, vol 2, pp 396–398Google Scholar
  12. Deer DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classifications and index properties of intact rock. Technical Report No: AFWL-TR 65-116. University of Illinois, USA, 300pGoogle Scholar
  13. Dott RH (1964) Wacke, graywacke and matrix; what approach to immature sandstone classification? J Sediment Res 34(3):625–632.  https://doi.org/10.1306/74D71109-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D Google Scholar
  14. Duggal, S.K. (2008), Building materials (3rd Revised Ed). New Age International Publishers, New-Delhi, p 521Google Scholar
  15. Duru M, Gedik I, Aksay A (2002) 1: 100 000 scale geological map of Turkey, no: 37, H-24 Adapazarı sheet. The Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdem PN (1981) Engineering geology. İDMM Academy Publications, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  17. Fort R, Alvarez de Buergo M, Perez-Monserrat EM, Gomez-Heras M, Varas-Muriel MJ, Freire DM (2013) Evolution in the use of natural building stone in Madrid, Spain. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46:421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2012-041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Göncüoğlu MC, Turhan N, Şentürk K, Uysal Ş, Özcan A, Işık A (1996) Geological properties of structure units of Nallıhan-Sarıcakaya in center Sakarya. The Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey Report (Unpublished), AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  19. Granit Y, Tintant H (1960) Observations Préliminaires sur le Jurassique de la région de Bilecik (Turquie). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences 251(17):1801–1803Google Scholar
  20. Hockman A, Kessler DW (1957) A Study of the properties of the U.S. Capitol Sandstone. National Bureau of Standards Report 4998, Gaithersburg, MD, 29pGoogle Scholar
  21. Karakaş A, Selim HH, Coruk Ö, Çatalbaş A, Taş ÖK (2018) Evaluation of Geological and Geomechanical Properties of Osmaneli (Bilecik) Lefke Building Stone, 71st Geological Congress of Turkey. METU Culture and Convention Center, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  22. Kazancı N, Gürbüz A (2014) Natural stones qualified as geological heritage in Turkey. Geol Bull Turkey 57(1):19–44Google Scholar
  23. Kılıç I (2017) Physical and mechanical properties of Yenimuhacir sandstone as construction material. Gaziosmanpaşa J Sci Res 6(3):1–11Google Scholar
  24. Kılıç I, Gültekin AH (2009) Effects of surface protection resin on water absorption and strength of sandstone, 5th International Advanced Technologies Symposium. Karabük University, pp 2196–2199Google Scholar
  25. Kılıç I, Gültekin AH (2011) The physical properties of Edirne (Keşan) region sandstones as building stone. 6th international advanced technologies symposium (IATS’11). Fırat University, pp 228–232Google Scholar
  26. Kılıç I, Gültekin AH (2017) Reasons of decomposition observed in sandstones used in the historical Edirne station building. Kırklareli University J Eng Sci 3:56–67Google Scholar
  27. Lott G, Cameron D (2005) The building stones of South East England: mineralogy and provenance. 10th euroseminar on microscopy applied to building materials, Paisley, Scotland, 21–25 June 2005Google Scholar
  28. Onaran K (2014) Material science, 13th edn. Scientific and Technical Publishing House, Istanbul, p 383Google Scholar
  29. Özkan S, Yaşar E (2007) Investigation of Physico-mechanical and petrographic properties of Salbaş (Adana) sandstones. Çukurova University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences 16(2):112–120Google Scholar
  30. Quick GW (2002) Selective guide to the specification of dimension stone. Discovering Stone 1(1):8–21Google Scholar
  31. Saner S (1977) Geology of Geyve-Osmaneli-Gölpazarı-Taraklı area; old sediment areas and evolution of sedimentation. The Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey Report No: 6306, PhD Thesis, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  32. Saner S (1980) The paleogeographical interpretation of the Mudurnu-Göynük basin based on the depositional features of the Jurassic and later ages. Geol Bull Turkey 23:39–52Google Scholar
  33. Snethlage R (2005) Leitfaden zur Steinkonservierung. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 347pGoogle Scholar
  34. TS EN 12370 (2001) Natural stone test methods-determination of resistance to salt crystallization. TSI, 5pGoogle Scholar
  35. TS EN 12371 (2003) Natural stone test methods-determination of frost resistance. TSI, 12pGoogle Scholar
  36. TS EN 13161 (2009) Natural stone test methods-determination of flexural strength under constant moment. TSI, 17pGoogle Scholar
  37. TS EN 13755 (2009) Natural stone test methods-determination of water absorption at atmospheric pressure. TSI, 10pGoogle Scholar
  38. TS EN 13919 (2004) Natural stone test methods-determination of resistance to ageing by SO2 action in the presence of humidity. TSI, 7pGoogle Scholar
  39. TS EN 14147 (2004) Natural stone test methods-determination of resistance to ageing by salt mist. TSI, 10pGoogle Scholar
  40. TS EN 14157 (2017) Natural stone test methods-determination of the abrasion resistance. TSI, 19pGoogle Scholar
  41. TS EN 14205 (2004) Natural stone test methods-determination of Knoop hardness. TSI, 11pGoogle Scholar
  42. TS EN 1926 (2000) Natural stone test methods-determination of uniaxial compressive strength. TSI, 17pGoogle Scholar
  43. TS EN 1936 (2010) Natural stone test methods-determination of real density and apparent density and of total and open porosity. TSI, 10pGoogle Scholar
  44. TS EN ISO 12572 (2016) Hydrothermal performance of building materials and products-determination of water vapor transmission properties-cup method. TSI, 41pGoogle Scholar
  45. Ulusay R, Türeli K, Ider MH (1994) Prediction of engineering properties of a selected litharenite sandstone from its petrographic characteristics using correlation and multivariate statistical techniques. Eng Geol 38(1–2):135–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90029-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vazquez P, Alonso FJ, Carrizo L, Molina E, Cultrone G, Blanco M, Zamora I (2013) Evaluation of the petrophysical properties of sedimentary building stones in order to establish quality criteria. Constr Build Mater 41:868–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xeidakis GS, Samaras IS (1996) Durability of a sandstone used as a principal building and decorative material in ancient Abdera, Xanthi, N. Greece. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 54:137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Faculty, Jewelry Engineering Departmentİstanbul Commerce UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Engineering Faculty, Geological Engineering DepartmentKocaeli UniversityIzmitTurkey

Personalised recommendations