Advertisement

New roughness parameters for 3D roughness of rock joints

  • Liren Ban
  • Chun Zhu
  • Chengzhi Qi
  • Zhigang Tao
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

To clearly portray the mechanical behavior of the shear process and to relate three-dimensional surface morphology to the shear strength of rock joints, we propose a new method, the equivalent height difference system, which can reflect that different geometric parameters of the asperities contribute differently to shear strength. A roughness parameter, the average equivalent height difference (AHD), is obtained by averaging the equivalent height difference in the shear direction, which can reflect the fluctuation and directivity of the joint surface morphology. The values of AHD at different sampling intervals were studied. The relationship between AHD values and sampling intervals is power law. Another roughness parameter, fractal dimension (DAHD), was proposed based on the fractal component, which characterizes the relationship of roughness at different scales and describes the roughness comprehensively from the point of view of scale. We used these two newly proposed roughness parameters to characterize the roughness of five joint surfaces. The results show that the new method can well reflect the three-dimensional morphology of the joint and describe the anisotropy of roughness, and it can also overcome the influence of the sampling interval.

Keywords

Joint shear strength Rectangular-shaped asperities Surface morphology Roughness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973) (Project No. 802015CB575) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 51478027 and 51174012).

References

  1. Barton N, Choubey V (1997) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10(1–2):1–54Google Scholar
  2. Barton N, Quadros EFD (1997) Joint aperture and roughness in the prediction of flow and groutability of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):252.e1–252.e14Google Scholar
  3. Belem T, Homand-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33(4):217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SJ, Zhu WC, Yu QL et al (2016) Characterization of anisotropy of joint surface roughness and aperture by variogram approach based on digital image processing technique. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(3):855–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng Y, Wang C, Liang Z et al (2006) Study on description index system of rough surface based on bi-body interaction. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(12):2481–2492. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Homand F, Belem T, Souley M (2001) Friction and degradation of rock joint surfaces under shear loads. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 25(10):973–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang SL, Oelfke SM, Speck RC (1992) Applicability of fractal characterization and modelling to rock joint profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29(2):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang MC, Kim JS, Kim KH (2005) Fractal dimension analysis of machined surface depending on coated tool wear. Surf Coat Technol 193(1–3):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kwon TH, Hong ES, Cho GC (2010) Shear behavior of rectangular-shaped asperities in rock joints. KSCE J Civ Eng 14(3):323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee YH, Carr JR, Barr DJ et al (1990) The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(6):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu QS, Tian YC, Liu DF et al (2017) Updates to JRC-JCS model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Eng Geol 228:282–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(5):329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scholz CH (1998) Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391(6662):37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. She CX, Sun FT (2018) Study of the peak shear strength of a cement-filled hard rock joint. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(3):713–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sun FT, Jiang QR, She CX (2012) Research on three-dimensional roughness characteristics of tensile granite joint. Appl Mech Mater 204-208:514–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun FT, She CX, Wan LT et al (2014) Peak shear strength criterion for rock joints based on three-dimensional morphology characteristics. Chinese J Geotech Eng 36(3):529–536 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Tang ZC, Wong LNY (2016) New criterion for evaluating the peak shear strength of rock joints under different contact states. Rock Mech. Rock Eng 49(4):1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tang H, Ge Y, Wang L et al (2012) Study on estimation method of rock mass discontinuity shear strength based on three-dimensional laser scanning and image technique. J Earth Sci 23(6):908–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tang ZC, Huang RQ, Liu QS, Wong LNY (2016a) Effect of contact state on the shear behavior of artificial rock joint. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(2):761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang ZC, Jiao YY, Wong LNY et al (2016b) Choosing appropriate parameters for developing empirical shear strength criterion of rock joint: review and new insights. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(11):4479–4490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2010) A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(8):1391–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian YC, Liu QS, Ma H et al (2018) New peak shear strength model for cement filled rock joints. Eng Geol 233:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(5):303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang Q (1982) Study on determination of rock joint roughness by using elongation rate[C]. In: Proc Undergoing Constructions. Jinchuan, China, pp 343–348Google Scholar
  26. Xia CC, Tang ZC, Xiao WM et al (2014) New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(2):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xie H, Wang JA, Xie WH (1997) Fractal effects of surface roughness on the mechanical behavior of rock joints. Chaos Solitons Fractals 8(2):221–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie H, Wang JA, Stein E (1998) Direct fractal measurement and multifractal properties of fracture surfaces. Phys Lett A 242(1–2):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang ZY, Lo SC, Di CC (2001) Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z2. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34(3):243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu X, Vayssade B (1991) Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28(4):333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang XB, Jiang QH, Chen N et al (2016) Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(9):1–18Google Scholar
  32. Zhang XB, Yi B, Jiang QH et al (2017) Evaluation models for the peak shear-strength and shear-resistance components of rough rock joints. J Test Eval 45(6):2128–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanics and Civil EngineeringChina University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)BeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground EngineeringBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Future Urban Design High-Tech Innovation Center and 2011 Energy Conservation and Emission reduction Collaborative Innovation CenterBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina
  4. 4.Shool of Civil and Transportation EngineeringBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations