Advertisement

Fines quality assessment in all-in aggregates for pavement layers related to different standard procedures

  • Olivera ĐokićEmail author
  • Marijana Nikolić Ivanović
  • Simo Tošović
  • Suzana Stefanović
  • Bratislav Milić
  • Aleksandra Rosić
Original Paper

Abstract

During the construction of the unbound pavement layers of Corridors X and XI in Serbia, a problem was detected regarding the evaluation of cleanliness of the available materials. The European standard for the sand equivalent from 1999 to 2015 had significant changes related to the test procedure. A mass correction has been taken into account. It consists of replacing a part of the fines with rinsed material (0.063/2 mm) when the percentage of fines exceeds 10% in a tested fraction. Thus, the test sample usually yields high values of the sand equivalent, which often exceeds the limits of 50% and 60%. From the standpoint of the technical specifications, aggregates are considered clean, while using other methods like methylene blue or a plasticity index, the presence of clay particles above the limits can be confirmed. This paper presents the results of research on 63 laboratory-prepared test samples of limestone aggregate with small quantities of the smectite group of clay minerals, where the fines content in the unbound aggregate, 0/31.5 mm, gradually increased up to 20%. It was found that the sand equivalent values are continuously decreasing from 84 to 14% in the fraction 0/2 mm and from 87 to 18% in the 0/4 mm fraction, with increasing of the methylene blue value of the all-in aggregate (MBA) from 0.4 to 4.5 g/kg. Correlations of different methods and fractions, as well as with the content of fines were found. There are no correlations with SE10 because of grouping the test data around one point.

Keywords

Unbound aggregates Fines Sand equivalent Methylene blue Aggregate purity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Highway Institute Belgrade for funding part of the laboratory work. The Laboratory for Geomechanics for preparation of test samples and the Laboratory for Stone and Stone Aggregates for testing. The authors wish to thank the Faculty of Mining and Geology, Laboratory for Crystallography, for mineralogical analysis of selected samples and clay components. The authors also wish to thank Ivan Delević and Snezana Ninić for technical support.

References

  1. Bohar F (2008) Določitve metilen modro na značilnih kamenih agregatih - kaj pa zemljine? = determination of methylene blue on significant aggregates - what about soils? In: Discussions of the fifth consultation of Slovenian geotechnics. Slovenian Geotechnical Society, Nova Gorica, pp 105–114Google Scholar
  2. Branco FC, Quinta-Ferreira M, Fernandes I (2017) Characteristics of aggregates used in road construction in Portugal, complying with the requirements of European Conformity (CE marking). Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1066-8
  3. Cvetanović A, Banić B (2007) Pavement. Academic Mind, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  4. Ćwiąkała M, Gajewska B, Kraszewski C, Rafalski L (2016) Recapitulation of research on frost susceptibility of unbound mixtures for pavement structures. Roads Bridg - Drog i Most 15.  https://doi.org/10.7409/rabdim.016.018
  5. FprEN 13242 (2018) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials for use in civil engineering work and road construction. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  6. Mpalatsas I, Rigopoulos I, Tsikouras B, Hatzipanagiotou K (2013) Evaluation of cretaceous limestones from the Aitoloakarnania province (Western Greece) for their use as road aggregates in terms of their content in swelling clay minerals. Bull Geol Soc Greece 47:1991–1999Google Scholar
  7. Nikolaides A, Manthos E, Sarafidou M (2007) Sand equivalent and methylene blue value of aggregates for highway engineering. Found Civ Environ Eng 10:111–121Google Scholar
  8. Nikolić Ivanović M, Đokić O, Stefanović S, Milić B (2018) Fines quality for base and subbase layers in pavement. In: Third Serbian Road Congress. Serbian road society ‘Via - Vita’, Belgrade, p 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Petkovšek A, Maček M, Pavšič P, Bohar F (2010) Fines characterization through the methylene blue and sand equivalent test: comparison with other experimental techniques and application of criteria to the aggregate quality assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:561–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-010-0274-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Public Enterprise Roads of Serbia (2012) SRCS Technical Conditions for Roads Construction, 2 Special technical Conditions, 2.4 Pavement. Public Enterprise Roads of SerbiaGoogle Scholar
  11. SRPS EN 1097-1 (2013) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Determination of the resistance to wear (micro-Deval). Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  12. SRPS EN 1097-2 (2013) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Methods for the determination of resistance to fragmentation. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  13. SRPS EN 933-1 (2013) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Determination of particle size distribution — Sieving method. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  14. SRPS EN 933-8 (2008) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Assessment of fines — Sand equivalent test. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  15. SRPS EN 933-8 (2013) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Assessment of fines — Sand equivalent test. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  16. SRPS EN 933-8 (2016) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Assessment of fines — Sand equivalent test. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  17. SRPS EN 933-9 (2014) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Assessment of fines - Methylene blue test. Technical Committee CEN/TC154 ‘Aggregates’Google Scholar
  18. SRPS EN 13285 (2012) European Standard emitted by CEN, European Committee for Standardization: Unbound mixtures — Specifications. Technical Committee CEN/TC 227 “Road materials”Google Scholar
  19. SRPS U.B1.018 (2005) National Standard of Serbia: Testing of soils - Determination of particle size distribution. Institute for standardization of SerbiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Stapel EE, Verhoef PNW (1989) The use of the methylene blue adsorption test in assessing the quality of basaltic tuff rock aggregate. Eng Geol 26:233–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(89)90011-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stefanović S, Đokić O, Milić B (2014) Adjustment of the technical project requirements with the quality of available stone aggregate. In: First Serbian Road Congress. Serbian road society ‘Via - Vita’, Belgrade, pp 880–891Google Scholar
  22. Tamer T (1996) The use of methylene blue adsorption test to assess the clay content of the Cappadocian tuff. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/methylene-blue-adsorption-test-assess-clay-content-cappadocian-tuff/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivera Đokić
    • 1
  • Marijana Nikolić Ivanović
    • 1
  • Simo Tošović
    • 1
  • Suzana Stefanović
    • 1
  • Bratislav Milić
    • 1
  • Aleksandra Rosić
    • 2
  1. 1.Highway InstituteBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mining and GeologyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations