Shaking table test to assess seismic response differences between steep bedding and toppling rock slopes
- 247 Downloads
In order to investigate the seismic response of steep bedding and toppling rock slopes, a large-scale shaking table test was performed taking into consideration a variety of factors such as slope type and input seismic excitation. Diverse seismic responses, including acceleration and earth pressure at several locations, were analyzed in terms of the test results. It was found that the slope type has a significant impact on the failure mechanism and response norm of different kinds of rock slopes. Firstly, the slide surface of the steep bedding rock slope is basically parallel to the slope surface, while that of toppling rock slope skews the rock layer under seismic load. The failure zone area of the toppling rock slope is smaller than that of the bedding rock slope, which is mainly because it consumes plenty of seismic energy to break through the rock layer of the toppling rock slope. In addition, for acceleration along the vertical direction, an abrupt amplifying effect exists at the top slope when the peak input motion acceleration (PIMA) exceeds a certain value: 0.6 g for a bedding rock slope and 0.4 g for a toppling rock slope. Meanwhile, for acceleration along the horizontal direction, the acceleration amplifying factors of toppling rock slopes are larger at the slope surface but smaller at the inner slope portion than that of bedding rock slopes. Furthermore, the acceleration amplifying factor is larger than the earth pressure amplifying factor at the slope surface. The earth pressure amplifying factor at the top surface for a toppling rock slope is close to that of a bedding rock slope with an increase in PIMA. This novel experiment reveals the different failure mechanisms between steep bedding and toppling rock slopes, as well as being of help to the conduct of further study on seismic hazard early warnings.
KeywordsShaking table test Steep bedding rock slopes Toppling rock slopes Seismic response
The present study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41502299 and No. 41372306) as well as the Research Planning of Sichuan Education Department, China (No. 16ZB0105), State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project (SKLGP2016Z007), Chengdu University of Technology Young and Middle-Aged Backbone Program (KYGG201720), and China scholarship council project (201708515101). The authors are grateful to Professor Niek Rengers of ITC in the Netherlands for his comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
- Arango I, Seed BH (1974) Seismic stability and deformation of clay slopes. J Geotech Eng Div 100(2):139–156Google Scholar
- Chen WY. 2004. Physical model studies of seismic slope response and performance. Dissertations and Theses Global, ISBN-13: 9780542007446; Paper number: 3165319; Publisher: ProQuest LLCGoogle Scholar
- Elgamal AZ, Yang Z, Lai T, Kutter BL, Wilson DW (2005) Dynamic response of saturated dense sand in laminated centrifuge container. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(5):598–609. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:5(598) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feng QM, Shao GB (2005) Analysis of liquefaction-induced landslide due to earthquake on gentle submarine slope. Rock Soil Mech 26(SUPPL1):141–145 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering. The institution of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Laak P, Ng C (2005) Stability of loose CDG fill slopes subjected to uni-axial and bi-axial earthquakes in a centrifuge. Proc 16th Int Conf Soil Mechanics Geotech Eng: Geotechnol Harmony Global Environ 4:2723–2726Google Scholar
- Liu HX, Xu Q. 2011 Shaking table model test on slope dynamic deformation and failure. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 32(supplement 2). doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2011.s2.028
- Nakajima S, Watanabe K, Shinoda M, et al. 2015 Consideration on evaluation of seismic slope stability based on shaking table model test. 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2015: New Innovations and Sustainability, p 957–962. doi: https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.JPN-100
- Qiao L, ChangY ZJP et al (2008) Shake table testing and FLAC modeling of liquefaction-induced slope failure and damage to buried pipelines. Proc first Natl Conf Eng Safety Protect 1:387–395Google Scholar
- Shi NX (2012) Seismic time-history response analysis of rock slope contains soft layer. Master Thesis. Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yu YZ, Deng L, Li R (2007) Centrifuge model test of the seismic response behavior of a sand slope. J Tsinghua Univ 47(6):789–792 (in Chinese)Google Scholar