Seismic site characterization for Moulvibazar town, Bangladesh

  • Md. Zillur Rahman
  • Md. Shakhawat Hossain
  • A. S. M. Maksud Kamal
  • Sumi Siddiqua
  • Fansab Mustahid
  • Atikul Haque Farazi
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In recent years, decision-making and site-planning strategies for earthquake mitigation have shifted away from a crisis management approach, to a greater emphasis on risk reduction. The earthquake hazard of a particular area can be assessed using geophysical and geotechnical site investigations. In the present study, seismic site characterization was carried out to evaluate earthquake risk for the town of Moulvibazar, Bangladesh, by integrating geophysical and geotechnical approaches. The study revealed that the average shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 m (AVS30) varied from 150 to 235 m/s, and US National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) soil site classes D and E were predominant, with soil amplification factors (SAF) of 1.3 and 1.45 for site classes D and E, respectively. In addition, peak ground acceleration (PGA) at the ground surface ranged from 0.325 to 0.3625 g, foundation layer depths for the deep foundation varied from 15 to 29 m, and the predominant periods ranged from 0.35 to 0.72 s. These soil parameters can be used to prepare an earthquake risk-sensitive land use plan for future urban development and to design earthquake-resistant structures.

Keywords

Seismic site characterization AVS30 PS logging MASW SPT-N Predominant period 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) for providing financial support for this research project through a special allocation. The authors are also grateful to Moulvibazar local administrative authorities for their support during data acquisition, and to Mr. Md. Ashraful Islam, Assistant Professor, Department of Geology, and Dewan Md. Enamul Haque, Lecturer, and BM Rabby Hossain, Lecturer, Department of Disaster Science and Management, University of Dhaka, for their support in completing this research.

References

  1. Abrahamson NA, Silva W, Kamai R (2013) Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction equations based on the NGA-West2 data set. Pacific Engineering Research Center Report 174Google Scholar
  2. Acharyya SK (2007) Collisional emplacement history of the Naga-Andaman ophiolites and the position of the eastern Indian suture. J Asian Earth Sci 29:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aitchison JC, Ali JR, Davis AM (2007) When and where did India and Asia collide? J Geophys Res 112:1978–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aki K (1957) Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors. Bull Earthq Res Inst 35:415–456Google Scholar
  5. Akin MK, Kramer SL, Topal T (2011) Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance (SPT-N) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey). Eng Geol 119:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alam M, Alam MM, Curray JR (2003) An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sed Geol 155:179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159:165–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02323.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Mapping of average shear wave velocity for Bangalore region: a case study. J Environ Eng Geophys 13:69–84. doi: 10.2113/JEEG13.2.69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anbazhagan P, Parihar A, Rashmi HN (2012) Review of correlations between SPT N and shear modulus: a new correlation applicable to any region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 36:52–69. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anderson JG, Lee Y, Zeng Y, Day S (1996) Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1749–1759Google Scholar
  11. Andrus RD, Fairbanks CD, Zhang J et al (2006) Shear-wave velocity and seismic response of near-surface sediments in Charleston, South Carolina. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1897–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Auld B (1977) Cross-hole and down-hole Vs by mechanical impulse. J Geotech Eng Div 103:1381–1398Google Scholar
  13. Benjumea B, Hunter JA, Pullan SE, et al (2008) Vs30 and fundamental site period estimates in soft sediments of the Ottawa Valley from near-surface geophysical measurements. J Environ Eng Geophy 13(4):313–323. doi: 10.2113/JEEG13.4.313Google Scholar
  14. Bilham R (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Ann Geophys 47:839–858. doi: 10.4401/ag-3338 Google Scholar
  15. Bilham R, England P (2001) Plateau “pop-up” in the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature 410:806–809. doi: 10.1038/35071057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bilham R, Hough S (2006) Future earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent: inevitable hazard, preventable risk. South Asian J 12:1–9Google Scholar
  17. BNBC (1993) Bangladesh national building codes (BNBC). Housing and Building Research Institute and Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  18. Boore DM, Brown LT (1998) Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles from inversion of surface-wave phase velocities with downhole measurements: systematic differences between the CXW method and downhole measurements at six USC strong-motion sites. Seismol Res Lett 69:222–229. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.69.3.222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boore DM, Stewart J, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2013) NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting Response Spectral Accelerations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. doi: 10.1193/070113EQS184M
  20. Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design. Earthq Spectra 10:617–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brandenberg SJ, Bellana N, Shantz T (2010) Shear wave velocity as function of standard penetration test resistance and vertical effective stress at California bridge sites. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1026–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. BSSC (2015) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Part 1 (provisions) and Part 2 (commentary), FEMA P-1050-1, Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2013) NGA-West2 Campbell-Bozorgnia ground motion model for the horizontal components of PGA, PGV, response spectra for periods ranging from 0. 01 to 10 secGoogle Scholar
  24. Castelli F, Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Lentini V (2016) Seismic microzoning from synthetic ground motion earthquake scenarios parameters: the case study of the city of Catania (Italy). 88:307–327. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.010 Google Scholar
  25. Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2006) Volcanic soil characterisation and site response analysis in the City of Catania. In: Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco, April 18–22, 2006, pp 835–844Google Scholar
  26. Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2008) Site Response Analysis for Tito Scalo Area (PZ) in the Basilicata Region, Italy. In: Proceedings of the 4th Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference. ASCE—Geotechnical Special Publication, Sacramento, May 18–22, 2008, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  27. Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2013) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA ground motion model for average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Peer Rep 30:1117–1153. doi: 10.1193/1.2894832 Google Scholar
  28. Crampin S, Bath M (1965) Higher modes of seismic surface waves: mode separation. Geophys J Int 10:81–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1965.tb03053.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Curray JR, Emmel FJ, Moore DG, Raitt RW (1982) Structure, tectonics, and geological history of the northeastern Indian Ocean. In: Nairn AEM, Stehli FG (eds) The oceans basins and margins. Plenum, New York, pp 399–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dikmen Ü (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72. doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/7/1/N02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB et al (2000) New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16:41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2012) Local site characterization and seismic zonation study by utilizing active and passive surface wave methods: a case study for the northern side of Ankara, Turkey. Eng Geol 151:64–81. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fabbrocino S, Lanzano G, Forte G et al (2015) SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy). Eng Geol 187:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hasançebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Imai T (1977) P and S wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In: Proceeding of IX International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp 127–132Google Scholar
  36. Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium of Penetration Testing. Amsterdam, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  37. Kuo CH, Wen KL, Hsieh HH et al (2011) Evaluating empirical regression equations for Vs and estimating Vs30 in northeastern Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuo CH, Wen KL, Hsieh HH et al (2012) Site classification and Vs30 estimation of free-field TSMIP stations using the logging data of EGDT. Eng Geol 129–130:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee SH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J Chin Inst Eng 13:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maheswari RU, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotech Geol Eng 28:119–137. doi: 10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin S, Szeliga W (2010) A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:562–569. doi: 10.1785/0120080328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matsuoka M, Wakamatsu K, Fujimoto K, Midorikawa S (2006) Average shear-wave velocity mapping using Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map. Struct Eng Earthq Eng 23:57s–68s. doi: 10.2208/jsceseee.23.57s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maurin T, Rangin C (2009) Structure and kinematics of the Indo-Burmese Wedge: recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics 28:1–21. doi: 10.1029/2008TC002276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mcmechan GA, Yedlin MJ (1981) Analysis of dispersive waves by wave field transformation. Geophysics 46:869–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morino M, Kamal ASMM, Muslim D et al (2011) Seismic event of the Dauki Fault in 16th century confirmed by trench investigation at Gabrakhari village, Haluaghat, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci 42:492–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morino M, Kamal ASMM, Akhter SH et al (2014) A paleo-seismological study of the Dauki fault at Jaflong, Sylhet, Bangladesh: historical seismic events and an attempted rupture segmentation model. J Asian Earth Sci 91:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute (RTRI) 30(1), JapanGoogle Scholar
  48. Nazarian S, Stokoe KHI, Hudson WR (1983) Use of spectral analysis of surface waves method for determination of moduli and thicknesses of pavement systems: transport. Res Record 930:38–45Google Scholar
  49. Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 6:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Okada H (2003) The microtremor survey method. Geophys Monogr Ser, SEGCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oldham RD (1899) Report on the great earthquake of 12th June 1897. Mem Geol Surv, India, p 29Google Scholar
  52. Park S, Elrick S (1998) Predictions of shear-wave velocities in southern California using surface geology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:677–685Google Scholar
  53. Park C, Park CB, Miller RD et al (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64:800–808. doi: 10.1190/1.1444590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Park C-B, Miller R-D, Ryden N et al (2005) Combined use of active and passive surface waves. J Environ Eng Geophys 10:323–334. doi: 10.2113/JEEG10.3.323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rahman MZ, Siddiqua S, Kamal ASMM (2015) Liquefaction hazard mapping by liquefaction potential index for Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Eng Geol 188:137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rahman MZ, Siddiqua S, Kamal ASMM (2016) Shear wave velocity estimation of the near-surface materials of Chittagong City. J Appl Geophys, Bangladesh for seismic site characterization. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.09.006 Google Scholar
  57. Steckler MS, Akhter SH, Seeber L (2008) Collision of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma Arc: implications for earthquake hazard. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:367–378. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stuart M (1920) The Srimangal earthquake of 8th July 1918. Mem Geol Surv India 46(1):1–70Google Scholar
  59. Szeliga W, Hough S, Martin S, Bilham R (2010) Intensity, magnitude, location, and attenuation in India for felt earthquakes since 1762. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:570–584. doi: 10.1785/0120080329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. UBC (1997) International conference of building officials. Uniform Building Code, WhittierGoogle Scholar
  61. Xia J, Miller RD, Park CB (1999) Estimation of near-surface shear wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics 64:691–700. doi: 10.1190/1.1444578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Disaster Science and ManagementUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.Department of Geology and MiningUniversity of BarisalBarisalBangladesh

Personalised recommendations