Back analysis of an ancient rockslide at Lake Fundudzi, Limpopo Province, South Africa

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

A massive rockslide occurred in the Soutpansberg Mountains of the Limpopo Province ~20,000 years ago that blocked the course of the eastern flowing Mutale River forming Lake Fundudzi, which is the only known true inland lake in South Africa. The landslide occurred in the northwestward dipping and highly jointed Fundudzi Formation of the Soutpansberg Group. The failed slope was observed to be a homogenous jointed sandstone rock slope which is quartzitic in places. Cluster analysis, which uses fuzzy clustering in Rocscience Dips, revealed three major joint sets (JS1, S0 and JS3) in the rock mass with an average dip and dip direction of 85°/237°, 15°/283° and 73°/157°, respectively. The main failure plane best correlated with JS3, which dips towards the lake. The kinematic analysis also revealed that the mechanism of failure was planar which is in agreement with site observations. The strong rock material classification of the sandstone from a laboratory index and mechanical tests was one of the indicators that failure could have been mostly structurally controlled. The technique of back-analysis was employed using RocPlane in order to investigate the geotechnical conditions that may have resulted in failure. The results obtained from the sensitivity analysis in RocPlane showed that the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) followed by the residual basic friction angle (ϕ r) were the main influential shear strength parameters on the factor of safety, F, as opposed to the joint wall compressive strength (JCS) which has very little impact on F for the range of values considered. Results from back-analysis show a range of possible combinations of JRC and ϕ r values under different groundwater and seismic conditions. Whilst the groundwater shows more impact than the seismic coefficient, the field evidence points to seismic activity as a more plausible trigger than groundwater. This study shows the usefulness of back-analysis techniques in assessing various conditions of failure that may have resulted in ancient rockslides. Although it may not result in a unique set of geotechnical parameters that may have resulted in failure, it, however, gives an insight into probable causes of failure and, thus, can be useful in mitigation of future failures.

Keywords

Rockslide Lake Fundudzi Kinematic analysis Back analysis Planar failure 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the Council for Geoscience (CGS) for funding and supporting this project and also to the University of KwaZulu-Natal for the logistics in executing this project. The authors are very grateful to the reviewers for the comments made in the draft manuscript which ultimately improved the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Alonso EE (1976) Risk analysis of slopes and its application to slopes in Canadian sensitive clays. Géotechnique 26:453–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker OB (1979) A contribution to the geology of the Soutpansberg Group, Waterberg Group, Northern Transvaal. MSc thesis. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (unpublished)Google Scholar
  3. Barker OB, Brandl G, Callaghan CC, Eriksson PG, van der Neut M (2006) The Soutpansberg and Waterberg Groups and the Blouberg Formation. In: Johnson MR, Anhaeusser CR, Thomas RJ (eds) The geology of South Africa. Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg/Council for Geosciences, Pretoria, pp 301–319Google Scholar
  4. Barton NR (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Mech Min Sci and Geomech Abstr 13(10):1–24Google Scholar
  5. Barton NR, Bandis SC (1990) Review of predictive capabilities of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice. In: Barton N, Stephansson O (eds) Rock joints. Proceeding international symposium on rock joints, Loen, Norway. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 603–610Google Scholar
  6. Barton NR, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10(1–2):1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell FG (2007) Engineering Geology, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), Burlington, p 581Google Scholar
  8. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bieniawski ZT, Orr, CM (1976) Rapid site appraisal for dam foundations by the geomechanics classification. In: Proc. 12th International Congress on Large Dams, Mexico, pp 483–501Google Scholar
  10. Brady BHG, Brown ET (2006) Rock mechanics for underground mining, 3rd edn. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. Broch E, Franklin JA (1972) The Point load strength test. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 9(6):669–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bye AR, Bell FG (2001) Stability assessment and slope design at Sandsloot open pit, South Africa. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiliza SG, Richardson S (2008) Landslide incidence in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. In: Proceedings of the first world landslide forum. United Nations University, Tokyo, pp 100–103Google Scholar
  14. Cornforth D (2005) Landslides in practice: investigation, analysis and remedial/preventive options in soils. Wiley, New York, p 596Google Scholar
  15. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation. Special report 247, Transportation Research Board, Natioanl Research Council, Washington, pp 36–75Google Scholar
  16. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donnelly CR, Rigbey SJ (2007) The assessment of sliding resistance beneath concrete structures. Conference Paper. Canadian Dam Association Conference, St. John's, Canada. doi: 10.13140/2.1.2163.8728
  18. Duncan, JM Stark TD (1992) Soil strengths from back-analysis of slope failures. In: Proc. stability and performance of slopes and embankments II, ASCE, GSP 31, Berkeley, pp 890–904Google Scholar
  19. Duncan JM, Wright SG (2005) Soil Strength and Slope Stability. Wiley, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  20. El-Ramly H, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2002) Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Can Geotech J 39:665–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández LM, du Plessis A (1992) Seismic hazard maps for Southern Africa. Council for Geoscience, Geological Survey of South Africa, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredlund DG, Krahn J, Pufahl DE (1981) The relationship between limit equilibrium slope stability methods. In: Proceedings, 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, vol 3. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 409–416Google Scholar
  23. Hencher SR, Richards LR (1989) Laboratory direct shear testing of rock discontinuities. Ground Eng 22(2):24–31Google Scholar
  24. Hoek E (2000) Rock engineering. Course notes by Evert Hoek. Hoek’s Corner. http://www.rocscience.com. Accessed 25 Aug 2014
  25. Hoek E (2007) Practical Rock Engineering. Rocscience, Toronto (e-book) Google Scholar
  26. Hoek E, Bray JW (1981) Rock slope engineering, 3rd edn. Institute of Mineralogy and Metallurgy, London, p 358Google Scholar
  27. Hussain M, Start TD, Akhtar K (2010) Back-Analysis procedure for landslides. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geotechnical engineering. Pakistan Geotechnical Engineering Society, Lahore, Pakistan, pp 159–166Google Scholar
  28. Hynes-Griffin ME, Franklin AG (1984) Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, Misc. Paper GL-84-13Google Scholar
  29. ISRM (1979) Suggested methods for determining in situ deformability of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(3):195–214Google Scholar
  30. ISRM (1981) Rock characterisation, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. In: Brown ET (ed) Published for the commission on testing methods, International society for rock mechanics. Pegamon press, Oxford, New York, p 212Google Scholar
  31. Janisch EP (1931) Notes on the central part of the Soutpansberg and on the origin of Lake Fundudzi. Trans Geol Surv South Africa 54:152–162Google Scholar
  32. Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95:406–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khorombi M (2000) Towards a sustainable land-use plan for the Lake Fundudzi catchment area. M. Inst. Agr. thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  34. Kristen I, Fuhrmann A, Thorpe J, Röhl U, Wilkes H, Oberhänsli H (2007) Hydrological changes in southern Africa over the last 200 Ka as recorded in lake sediments from the Tswaing impact crater. S Afr J Geol 110:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leroueil S, Tavenas F (1981) Pitflalls of back-analysis. In: X International conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Stockholm, vol 1, pp 185–190Google Scholar
  36. Markland JT (1972) A Useful technique for estimating the stability of rock slope when the rigid wedge slide type of failure is expected. Imperial College Rock Mechanics Research Reprint, No. 19Google Scholar
  37. Mathis JI (1987) Discontinuity mapping—a comparison between line and area mapping. In: Proceedings 6th international congress, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Balkema. vol 2, pp 1111–1114Google Scholar
  38. Miller SM, McWilliams PC, Kerkering JC (1989) Evaluation of stereo digitizing for measuring rock fracture. In: Rock mechanics as a guide for efficient utilization of natural resources. Proceedings of 30th US symposium on rock mechanics, West Virginia. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 201–208Google Scholar
  39. Oppikofer T (2009) Detection, analysis and monitoring of slope movements by high-resolution digital elevation models. Faculty of Geosciences and Environment Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, p 183Google Scholar
  40. Paige-Green P (1989) Landslides: extent and economic significance in southern Africa. In: Brabb EE, Harrod BL (eds) Landslides: extent and economic significance. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 261–269Google Scholar
  41. Romana M (1993) A geomechanical classification for slopes: slope mass rating. In: Hudson JA (ed) Comprehensive rock engineering. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 575–599Google Scholar
  42. Sauer EK, Fredlund DG (1988) Effective Stress, limit equilibrium back-analysis of failed slopes: Guidelines, landslides-glissements de terrain. In: Christophe Bonnard (ed). Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on landslides, Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  43. Selby MJ (1982) Hillslope materials and processes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharifzadeh M, Sharifi M, Delbari SM (2009) Back analysis of an excavated slope failure in highly fractured rock mass: the case study of Kargar slope failure (Iran). Environ Earth Sci 60:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. South Africa Weather Services (2009). http://www.weathersa.co.za. Accessed 10 July 2014
  46. Stead D, Eberhardt E, Coggan JS (2006) Developments in the characterization of complex rock slope deformation and failure using numerical modelling techniques. Eng Geol 83:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van der Waal BCW (1997) Fundudzi, a unique, sacred and unknown South African lake. S Afr J Aquat Sci 23(l):42–55Google Scholar
  48. Van Eeden OR, Visser HN, Van Zyl JS, Coertze FJ, Wessels JT (1955) The geology of the eastern Soutpansberg and the Lowveld to the north. Explain. Sheet 42 (Soutpansberg), Geol. Surv. S. Afr., 117 pagesGoogle Scholar
  49. Wieczorek GF (1996) Landslide triggering mechanisms. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation. Special report 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, pp 76–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Geology CompetencyCouncil for GeoscienceSilvertonSouth Africa
  2. 2.Discipline of Geological Sciences, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and ScienceUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations