Reproductive fitness and dietary choice behavior of the genetic model organism Caenorhabditis elegans under semi-natural conditions
- 245 Downloads
Laboratory breeding conditions of the model organism C. elegans do not correspond with the conditions in its natural soil habitat. To assess the consequences of the differences in environmental conditions, the effects of air composition, medium and bacterial food on reproductive fitness and/or dietary-choice behavior of C. elegans were investigated. The reproductive fitness of C. elegans was maximal under oxygen deficiency and not influenced by a high fractional share of carbon dioxide. In media approximating natural soil structure, reproductive fitness was much lower than in s tandard laboratory media. I n seminatural media, the reproductive fitness of C. elegans was low with the standard laboratory food bacterium E. coli (γ-Proteobacteria), but significantly higher with C. arvensicola (Bacteroidetes) and B. tropica (β-Proteobacteria) as food. Dietary-choice experiments in semi-natural media revealed a low preference of C. elegans for E. coli but significantly higher preferences for C. arvensicola and B. tropica (among other bacteria). Dietary-choice experiments under quasi-natural conditions, which were feasible by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of bacteria, showed a high preference of C. elegans for Cytophaga-Flexibacter-Bacteroides, Firmicutes, and β-Proteobacteria, but a low preference for γ-Proteobacteria. The results show that data on C. elegans under standard laboratory conditions have to be carefully interpreted with respect to their biological significance.
Keywordscarbon dioxide FISH oxygen soil bacteria soil structure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ashelford, K.E., Fry, J.C., Bailey, M.J., and Day, M.J. (2002). Characterization of Serratia isolates from soil, ecological implications and transfer of Serratia proteamaculans subsp. quinovora Grimont et al. 1983 to Serratia quinivorans corrig., sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 2281–2289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006). Standard guide for conducting soil toxicity tests with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards 11.06, E2172-01.Google Scholar
- Avery, L., and Thomas, J.H. (1997). Feeding and defecation. In C. elegans II, D.L. Riddle, T. Blumenthal, B.J. Meyer, and J.R. Priess, eds. (Cold Spring Harbor, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp. 679–716.Google Scholar
- Bargmann, C.I. (2006). Chemosensation in C. elegans. In Worm Book, The C. elegans Research Community, eds., (http://www.wormbook.org., doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1).
- Gobat, J.M., Aragno, M., and Matthey, W. (2003). The Living Soil. (Enfield, USA: Science Publishers).Google Scholar
- Hope, I.A. (1999). C. elegans. Practical Approach Series. (New York, USA: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Kämpfer, P., Young, C.C., Sridhar, K.R., Arun, A.B., Lai, W.A., Shen, F.T., and Rekha, P.D. (2006). Transfer of [Flexibacter] sancti, [Flexibacter] filiformis, [Flexibacter] japonensis and [Cytophaga] arvensicola to the genus Chitinophaga and description of Chitinophaga skermanii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 2223–2228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiontke, K., and Sudhaus, W. (2006). Ecology of Caenorhabditis species. In Worm Book, The C. elegans Research Community, eds., (http://www.wormbook.org., doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.37.1).
- Lee, D.L., and Atkinson, H.J. (1976). Physiology of nematodes. (London, UK: Macmillan).Google Scholar
- Manz, W., Amann, R., Ludwig, W., Wagner, M., and Schleifer, K.-H. (1992). Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 15, 593–600.Google Scholar
- Neidig, N., Jousset, A., Nunes, F., Bonkowski, M., Paul, R.J., and Scheu, S. (2010). Interference between bacterial feeding nematodes and amoebae relies on innate and inducible mutual toxicity. Funct. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
- Pankratov, T.A., Kulichevskaya, I.S., Liesack, W., and Dedysh, S.N. (2006). Isolation of aerobic, gliding, xylanolytic and laminarinolytic bacteria from acidic Sphagnum peatlands and emended description of Chitinophaga arvensicola Kämpfer et al. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 2761–2764.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reis, V.M., Estrada-de los Santos, P., Tenorio-Salgado, S., Vogel, J., Stoffels, M., Guyon, S., Mavingui, P., Baldani, V.L.D., Schmid, M., Baldani, J.I., et al. (2004). Burkholderia tropica sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing, plant-associated bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 2155–2162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharabi, K., Hurwitz, A., Simon, A.J., Beitel, G.J., Morimoto, R.I., Rechavi, G., Sznajder, J.I., and Gruenbaum, Y. (2009). Elevated CO2 levels affect development, motility, and fertility and extend life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4024–4029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stiernagle, T. (2006). Maintenance of C. elegans. In Worm Book, The C. elegans Research Community, eds., (http://www.wormbook.org., doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1).
- Sulton, J.E., and Brenner, S. (1974). The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 95–104.Google Scholar