Differentiable strategy-proof mechanisms for private and public goods in domains that are not necessarily large or quasi-linear
- 48 Downloads
In this paper, we develop a differentiable approach to deal with incentives in a, possibly small, subset of a general domain of preferences in economies with one public and one private good. We show that, for two agents, there is no mechanism which is efficient, strategy-proof and where consumption of both goods is positive for all agents. For the case of two or more agents the same result occurs when nondictatorship is replaced by Individual Rationality.
KeywordsStrategy-proofness Public goods economies Differentiable mechanisms
JEL ClassificationD61 D78 H41
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bartle R (1976) The elements of real analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Clarke E (1971) Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 8: 19–33Google Scholar
- Green J, Laffont JJ (1979) Incentives in public-decision making. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Ledyard J, Roberts J (1975) On the incentive problem with public goods. Northwestern University Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Discussion Paper 116, Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Peleg B (1996) Double implementation of the Lindahl correspondence by a continuous mechanism. Econ Des 2: 311–324Google Scholar
- Saporiti A (2007) Strategy-proofness and single-crossing. Working Paper No. 49, Wallis Institute of Political Economy, University of RochesterGoogle Scholar
- Satterthwaite MA, Sonnenschein H (1981) Strategy-proof allocation mechanisms at differentiable points. Rev Econ Stud 53: 587–597Google Scholar
- Serizawa S (1996) Strategy-proof and individually rational social choice functions for public good economies. Econ Theory 7: 501–512Google Scholar
- Serizawa S (1997) Strategy-proof and individually rational social choice functions for public good economies. Econ Theory 9: 379–380Google Scholar
- Zachmanouglou EC, Thoe DW (1986) Introduction to partial differential equations with applications. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar