Review of Economic Design

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 199–216 | Cite as

The effect of spillovers on the provision of local public goods

  • Francis BlochEmail author
  • Unal Zenginobuz
Original Paper


This paper analyzes the provision of local public goods with positive spillovers across jurisdictions. If spillovers are symmetric, the non-cooperative game played by jurisdictions admits a unique equilibrium, and an increase in spillovers reduces the total provision of public goods. Smaller jurisdictions always reduce their contribution, but larger jurisdictions can increase their contribution. When spillovers are asymmetric, equilibrium is unique if spillovers are low, while multiple equilibria exist for high spillover values. In the case of two jurisdictions, an increase in the flow of spillovers to one jurisdiction benefits agents from that jurisdiction but harms agents in the other jurisdiction. Beyond the case of two jurisdictions, the effect of changes in spillovers cannot be signed. An increase in the spillovers flowing to a jurisdiction can actually result in an increase in the supply of public goods by that jurisdiction and harm agents residing in it, while benefiting agents in the other jurisdictions. The results of the paper reveal the complexity of interactions that will plague the design of institutions for multijurisdictional local public good economies with spillovers.


Local public goods Positive spillovers Equilibrium 

JEL Classification

H41 H73 H77 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. J Public Econ 29(1):25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H (1992) Uniqueness of Nash equilibrium in private provision of public goods: an improved proof. J Public Econ 49(3):391–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besley T, Coate S (2003) Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach. J Public Econ 87(12):2611–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjorvatn K, Schjelderup G (2002) Tax competition and international public goods. Int Tax Public Finance 9(2):111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch F, Zenginobuz U (2006) Tiebout equilibria in local public good economies with spillovers. J Public Econ (90):1745–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boskin M (1973) Local government tax and product competition and the optimal provision of public goods. J Polit Econ 81(1):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brainard W, Dolbaer F (1967) The possibility of oversupply of local “public” goods: a critical note. J Polit Econ 75(1):86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremer J, Palfrey T (2003) A voting model of federal standards with externalities. California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, working papers: 1171Google Scholar
  9. Lockwood B (2002) Distributive politics and the costs of centralization. Rev Econ Stud 69(2): 313–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oates W (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Redoano M, Scharf K (2004) The political economy of policy centralization: direct versus representative democracy. J Public Econ 88(3–4):799–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vives X (2000) Oligopoly pricing: old ideas and new tools. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams A (1966) The optimal provision of public goods in a system of local government. J Polit Econ 74(1):18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GREQAM Université de la Méditerranée and Warwick UniversityMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Center for Economic DesignBogazici UniversityBebek, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations