A comparison of two-dimensional prediction tracing and a virtual reality patient methods for diagnosis and treatment planning of orthognathic cases in dental students: a randomized preliminary study
- 15 Downloads
Virtual reality patient (VR patient), a simulated patient module in a virtual reality environment allowing manipulation of the upper and lower jaws and chin in three planes of space, was developed to help students understand diagnosis and treatment planning of orthognathic surgical procedures. The objective was to compare student understanding in diagnosing and treatment planning complex orthognathic cases using the VR patient versus a conventional 2D prediction tracing method and to determine feasibility of utilizing VR methods. Thirty third year dental students were assigned randomly to an experimental (VR patient) or control (2D tracing) group. The dependent variables were a multiple choice question (MCQ) examination, baseline and exit surveys, and written case analysis of two cases. Student–teacher interactions were recorded for both length and type of interaction. Data were evaluated using descriptive and inferential statistics. The students’ performance on the MCQ examinations improved immediately following the educational intervention (p < .05). However, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups on the written case analysis and pre-test, post-test, and follow-up MCQ examinations. The effect size of the intervention ranged from .14 to .90 and differed greatly between the written responses to the two cases. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the written response scoring was found to be reliable and reproducible (> .928). Dental students were able to improve their understanding of diagnosis and treatment planning of orthognathic cases using both 2D prediction tracing and the VR patient methods. The method of scoring the written responses was reliable and reproducible and should be used for future full-scale studies.
KeywordsVirtual reality Dental education Orthognathic surgical prediction Simulated patient Orthodontics Oral surgery
We thank Theodore Hall, Sean Petty, Stephanie O’Malley, Eric Maslowski, and Shawn O’Grady for developing the VR Patient module; Jason Sherbel and Justin Kammo for assisting with the research sessions; and Erin Walker for scheduling the study participants.
This study was funded in part by The University of Michigan Le Gro Fund and University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, Faculty Development.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
IRB exemption was obtained from the University of Michigan Health and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (#HUM00113004).
- Abdelwahab MG, Cavalcanti DD, Preul MC (2010) Role of computer technology in neurosurgery. Minerva Chir 65(4):409–428Google Scholar
- Agarwal N, Schmitt PJ, Sukul V, Prestigiacomo CJ (2012) Surgical approaches to complex vascular lesions: the use of virtual reality and stereoscopic analysis as a tool for resident and student education. BMJ Case Rep 2012:bcr0220125859Google Scholar
- Akay M, Marsh A (2001) Information technologies in medicine, vol 1. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Arikatla VS, Tyagi M, Enquobahrie A, Nguyen T, Blakey GH, White R, Paniagua B (2018) High fidelity virtual reality orthognathic surgery simulator. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 10576Google Scholar
- Becker O, Scolari N, Santos Melo MF, Avelar RL, Haas OLJ, Menenzes LM, Belle de Oliveira R (2013) Three-dimensional planning in orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomography and computer software. Comput Sci Syst Biol 6(6):6Google Scholar
- Gutiérrez FPJ, Vergara VM, Coulter R, Saland L, Caudell TP, Goldsmith TE, Alverson DC (2007) The effect of degree of immersion upon learning performance in virtual reality simulations for medical education. Stud Health Technol Inform 125:155–160Google Scholar
- Jasinevicius TR, Landers M, Nelson S, Urbankova A (2004) An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted. J Dent Educ 68(11):1151–1162Google Scholar
- McMillan JH, Schumacher S (2010) Research in education : evidence-based inquiry, 7th edn. Pearson, Boston, p 511Google Scholar
- Oculus Rift CV1 Teardown (2016) https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Oculus+Rift+CV1+Teardown/60612. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
- Oculus Rift Development Kit 2 Teardown (2014) https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Oculus+Rift+Development+Kit+2+Teardown/27613. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
- Oculus Rift DK1 Teardown (2013) https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Oculus+Rift+DK1+Teardown/13682. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
- Oculus Rift History—How it All Started (2015) http://riftinfo.com/oculus-rift-history-how-it-all-started. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
- Orthodontics. https://www.americanboardortho.com/media/1164/bcoe-examinee-worksheet.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
- Proffit WR, White RP (1991) Surgical-orthodontic treatment. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, p 722Google Scholar
- Shu Y, Huang YZ, Chang SH, Chen MY (2018) Do virtual reality head-mounted displays make a difference? A comparison of presence and self-efficacy between head-mounted displays and desktop computer-facilitated virtual environments. Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0376-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- UMichDent (2019) Dentistry and VR—Jaw surgery simulation [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCyrqmrMwPQ. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
- Wong DT, Mehta A, Singh KP, Leong SM, Ooi A, Niazi A, You-Ten E, Okrainec A, Patel R, Singh M et al (2019) The effect of virtual reality bronchoscopy simulator training on performance of bronchoscopic-guided intubation in patients: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 36(3):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xia J, Samman N, Yeung R, Shen S, Wang D, Ip H, Tideman H (2000) Three dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Ortho Orthog Surg 15(4):265–282Google Scholar
- Zawy Alsofy S, Stroop R, Fusek I, Welzel Saravia H, Sakellaropoulou I, Yavuz M, Ewelt C, Nakamura M, Fortmann T (2019) Virtual reality-based evaluation of surgical planning and outcome of monosegmental, unilateral cervical foraminal stenosis. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar