Advertisement

Advantages and limits of virtual reality in learning processes: Briviesca in the fifteenth century

  • David Checa
  • Andres BustilloEmail author
Original Article
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

Two teaching methodologies are presented and compared in this study: on the one hand, semi-guided tours in immersive virtual reality and, on the other, viewing video renderings of 3D environments. The two techniques are contrasted through 3D modeling of a fifteenth-century Spanish town called Briviesca, in an immersive environment, viewed with Oculus Rift. The suitability of virtual reality for teaching is assessed through questions on historical knowledge and urban layout. The understanding of the undergraduate students is evaluated, through questionnaires, after the viewing sessions. The responses of the students underline the effectiveness of the two methodologies: Video screenings received higher scores for historical ideas and the virtual tour was the most effective method at conveying knowledge learnt while viewing. Additionally, two user movements for controlling the virtual reality environment were tested: (1) gamepad locomotion and (2) roomscale movements combined with teleporting. The clear advantage of the second option was the total lack of motion sickness effects. However, the natural tendency using teleporting was to move very quickly through the city areas with no singular buildings and to spend more time in front of these types of buildings. They therefore missed visual information related to the first areas while retaining more information related to those buildings. Finally, the spatial location of singular buildings was clearly better acquired with the virtual tour.

Keywords

Virtual reality Learning Immersive environments Active learning Presence Game engine Cultural heritage Oculus Rift 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Titan Xp GPU used for this research and Mario Alaguero for his work on the 3D models.

Supplementary material

10055_2019_389_MOESM1_ESM.doc (480 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 479 kb)

References

  1. Alaguero M (2015) Briviesca en el siglo XIV - El sueño de Doña Blanca. Retrieved 12 Jan 2018, from 4/05/2015 website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=dwa7-94Y_Qw
  2. Alaguero M, Bustillo A, Guinea B, Iglesias LS (2015) The virtual reconstruction of a small medieval town: the case of Briviesca (Spain). In: Archaeopress (ed) CAA2014 21st century archaeology, concepts, methods and tools. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 575–584Google Scholar
  3. Alhalabi WS (2016) Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behav Inf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212931 Google Scholar
  4. Andreoli R, Corolla A, Faggiano A, Malandrino D, Pirozzi D, Ranaldi M, Santangelo G, Scarano V (2016) Immersivity and playability evaluation of a game experience in cultural heritage. In: Ioannides M, Fink E, Moropoulou A, Hagedorn-Saupe M, Fresa A, Liestøl G et al (eds) Digital heritage. Progress in cultural heritage: documentation, preservation, and protection. Springer, Cham, pp 814–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bustillo A, Alaguero M, Miguel I, Saiz JM, Iglesias LS (2015) A flexible platform for the creation of 3D semi-immersive environments to teach Cultural Heritage. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 2(4):248–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2015.11.002 Google Scholar
  6. Carrozzino M, Bergamasco M (2010) Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J Cult Herit.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001 Google Scholar
  7. Champion EM (2008) Otherness of place: game-based interaction and learning in virtual heritage projects. Int J Herit Stud 14(3):210–228.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953686 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Checa D, Alaguero M, Arnaiz MA, Bustillo A (2016) Briviesca in the 15th c.: a virtual reality environment for teaching purposes. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_11
  9. Chen S, Pan Z, Zhang M, Shen H (2013) A case study of user immersion-based systematic design for serious heritage games. Multimed Tools Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-011-0864-4 Google Scholar
  10. Chen G, Ma F, Jiang Y, Liu R (2018) Virtual reality interactive teaching for Chinese traditional Tibetan clothing. Art Des Commun High Educ 17:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chittaro L, Buttussi F (2015) Assessing knowledge retention of an immersive serious game vs. a traditional education method in aviation safety. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 9:8.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2391853 Google Scholar
  12. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, HillsdalezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. De Paolis LT (2013) Walking in a virtual town to understand and learning about the life in the middle ages. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computational science and its applications, vol 1, pp 632–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39637-3_50
  14. Delgado Ana R, Prieto G (1996) Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role? Mem Cognit 24(4):504–510.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freina L, Ott M (2015) A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: Scientific conference elearning and software for education, vol 1. “Carol I” National Defence University, p 133Google Scholar
  16. Hupont I, Gracia J, Sanagustin L, Gracia MA (2015) How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE? A use case of serious gaming with Oculus Rift. In: 2015 7th international workshop on quality of multimedia experience, QoMEX 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2015.7148110
  17. Kiourt C, Koutsoudis A, Kalles D (2018) Enhanced virtual reality experience in personalised virtual museums. Int J Comput Methods Herit Sci 2:23–39.  https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCMHS.2018010103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laurent D, Hismans G, Natacha D (2018) Exploring cultural heritage using virtual reality. In: Ioannides M (ed) Digital cultural heritage: final conference of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie initial training network for digital cultural heritage, ITN-DCH 2017, Olimje, Slovenia, 23–25 May 2017, revised selected papers, pp 289–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75826-8_24
  19. Lee EA-L, Wong KW, Fung CC (2010) Learning with virtual reality: its effects on students with different learning styles. In: Pan Z, Cheok AD, Müller W, Zhang X, Wong K (eds) Transactions on edutainment IV, pp 79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14484-4_8
  20. Loizides F, El Kater A, Terlikas C, Lanitis A, Michael D (2014) Presenting Cypriot cultural heritage in virtual reality: a user evaluation. In: Ioannides M, Fink E, Žarnić R, Alex-Yianing Y, Ewald Q (eds) Digital heritage. Progress in cultural heritage: documentation, preservation, and protection, pp 572–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13695-0_57
  21. Lorenzini C, Carrozzino M, Evangelista C, Tecchia F, Bergamasco M, Angeletaki A (2015) A virtual laboratory: an immersive VR experience to spread ancient libraries heritage. In: 2015 Digital heritage international congress, digital heritage 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419587
  22. Lucet G (2009) Virtual reality: a knowledge tool for cultural heritage. In: Ranchordas AK, Araújo HJ, Pereira JM, Braz J (eds) Computer vision and computer graphics. Theory and applications, pp 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10226-4_1
  23. Makransky G, Terkildsen TS, Mayer RE (2019) Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learn Instr 60:225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2017.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muller N, Panzoli D, Galaup M, Lagarrigue P, Jessel J (2017) Learning mechanical engineering in a virtual workshop: a preliminary study on utilisability, utility and acceptability. In: 2017 9th international conference on virtual worlds and games for serious applications (VS-Games), pp 55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2017.8055811
  25. Passig D, Tzuriel D, Eshel-Kedmi G (2016) Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D Immersive Virtual Reality environments. Comput Educ 95:296–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polcar J, Horejsi P (2015) Knowledge acquisition and cyber sickness: a comparison of Vr devices in virtual tours. Mod Mach Sci J 8:8.  https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2015_06_201516 Google Scholar
  27. Remondino F, Nocerino E, Toschi I, Menna F (2017) A critical review of automated photogrammetric processing of large datasets. ISPRS Arch.  https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-591-2017 Google Scholar
  28. Roussou M, Slater M (2017) Comparison of the effect of interactive versus passive virtual reality learning activities in evoking and sustaining conceptual change. IEEE Trans Emerging Top Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2737983 Google Scholar
  29. Webster R (2016) Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interact Learn Environ 24(6):1319–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.994533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BurgosBurgosSpain

Personalised recommendations