Virtual Reality

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 127–140 | Cite as

A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training

  • Kaushal Kumar Bhagat
  • Wei-Kai Liou
  • Chun-Yen Chang
Original Article


The goal of the present study was to develop a cost-effective, man–machine digital interface, to improve students’ real-world firing range training, results, and achievement scores. A serious game-based learning environment was developed, integrating invisible laser infrared technology, 1:1 real-scale rifle guns with recoil effects, as well as 3D interactive virtual reality (VR) military training digital information content, to train students in military live firing. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed design, students’ performance, in terms of their learning achievement and learning motivation, was examined. One hundred and sixty high school students from Taiwan were divided into four individual groups of 40 students each, with one control group and three experimental groups (EG1, EG2, and EG3). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The results of this cost-effective 3D VR showed significantly better learning motivation, learning outcomes, and positive impacts on users’ actual live firing achievement scores.


Serious games Virtual reality (VR) Military training Learning outcome Learning motivation 



This research is parti2ally supported by the “Aim for the Top University Project” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU), sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C. and the “International Research-Intensive Center of Excellence Program” of NTNU, and National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant No. NSC 103-2911-I-003-301.


  1. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Csete J, Wong Y-H, Vogel D (2004) Mobile devices in and out of the classroom. In: Paper presented at the world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  3. Defense USDO (2013) US army ranger handbook. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell JE (2002) Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul Gaming 33(4):441–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagman JD (2000) Basic rifle marksmanship training with the laser marksmanship training system. Retrieved from
  6. Hsu J (2010) For the US military, video games get serious. Retrieved from
  7. Huizenga J, Admiraal W, Akkerman S, Dam GT (2009) Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. J Comput Assist Learn 25(4):332–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hummel HGK, Van Houcke J, Nadolski RJ, Van Der Hiele T, Kurvers H, Löhr A (2011) Scripted collaboration in serious gaming for complex learning: effects of multiple perspectives when acquiring water management skills. Br J Educ Technol 42(6):1029–1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01122.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hung C-Y, Kuo F-O, Sun J-Y, Yu P-T (2014) An interactive game approach for improving students’ learning performance in multi-touch game-based learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 7(1):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang GJ, Wu PH (2012) Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. Br J Educ Technol 43(1):6–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01242.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kebritchi M, Hirumi A, Bai H (2010) The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Comput Educ 55(2):427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kennedy H (1999) Simulation reshaping military training. Retrieved from
  13. Ku O, Chen SY, Wu DH, Lao ACC, Chan T-W (2014) The effects of game-based learning on mathematical confidence and performance: high ability vs. Low Ability 17:65–78Google Scholar
  14. Lim CP (2008) Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: learning Mathematics, English and Science as a global citizen. Comput Educ 51(3):1073–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim C-W, Jung H-W (2013) A study on the military serious game. Adv Sci Technol Lett 39:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liou W-K, Lee S-C (2012) Application of laser guide and wireless control method on military training and the FPS game system. In: 2012 IEEE 4th international conference on paper presented at the digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (DIGITEL)Google Scholar
  17. Marsh T (2011) Serious games continuum: between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose. Entertain Comput 2(2):61–68MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller LM, Chang C-I, Wang S, Beier ME, Klisch Y (2011) Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game. Comput Educ 57(1):1425–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Post (2013) Canadian military using video simulations and popular shooting games to boost ordinary training. Retrieved from
  20. Papastergiou M (2009) Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput Educ 52(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sánchez J, Olivares R (2011) Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Comput Educ 57(3):1943–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sung H-Y, Hwang G-J (2013) A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Comput Educ 63:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sung H-Y, Hwang G-J, Yen Y-F (2015) Development of a contextual decision-making game for improving students’ learning performance in a health education course. Comput Educ 82:179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Szondy D (2014). US army examining next-gen augmented reality “live synthetic” simulations. Retrieved from
  25. Van Der Spek ED, Wouters P, Van Oostendorp H (2011) Code red: triage or cognition-based design rules enhancing decisionmaking training in a game environment. Br J Educ Technol 42(3):441–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01021.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang LC, Chen MP (2010) The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innov Educ Teach Int 47(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whitney SJ, Temby P, Stephens A (2014) A review of the effectiveness of game-based training for dismounted soldiers. J Def Model Simul Appl Methodol Technol 11(4):319–328Google Scholar
  28. Wijers M, Jonker V, Kerstens K (2008) MobileMath: the phone, the game and the math. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the European conference on game based learning, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolff RS, Purvis EJ, McCormack RT, Barber PG (2003). Moving weapons platform simulation system and training method. Google patentsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Science Education CenterNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations