Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 147–156 | Cite as

Structure and motion in urban environments using upright panoramas

  • Jonathan Ventura
  • Tobias Höllerer
SI: Mixed and Augmented Reality

Abstract

Image-based modeling of urban environments is a key component of enabling outdoor, vision-based augmented reality applications. The images used for modeling may come from off-line efforts, or online user contributions. Panoramas have been used extensively in mapping cities and can be captured quickly by an end-user with a mobile phone. In this paper, we describe and evaluate a reconstruction pipeline for upright panoramas taken in an urban environment. We first describe how panoramas can be aligned to a common vertical orientation using vertical vanishing point detection, which we show to be robust for a range of inputs. The orientation sensors in modern cameras can also be used to correct the vertical orientation. Secondly, we introduce a pose estimation algorithm, which uses knowledge of a common vertical orientation as a simplifying constraint. This procedure is shown to reduce pose estimation error in comparison with the state of the art. Finally, we evaluate our reconstruction pipeline with several real-world examples.

Keywords

Structure and motion Urban environments Panoramas 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Chris Coffin and Sehwan Kim for preparing the tripod panorama datasets, and to Google, Inc. for providing the Street View datasets. This work was partially supported by NSF CAREER grant IIS-0747520.

References

  1. Antone M, Teller S (2002) Scalable extrinsic calibration of omni-directional image networks. Int J Comput Vis 49:143–174zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baatz G, Köser K, Chen D, Grzeszczuk R, Pollefeys M (2010) Handling urban location recognition as a 2d homothetic problem. In: Daniilidis K, Maragos P, Paragios N (eds) Computer vision—ECCV 2010, lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Berlin, pp 266–279Google Scholar
  3. Fraundorfer F, Tanskanen P, Pollefeys M (2010) A minimal case solution to the calibrated relative pose problem for the case of two known orientation angles. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on computer vision: part IV, ECCV’10, Springer, Berlin, pp 269–282Google Scholar
  4. Gallagher AC (2005) Using vanishing points to correct camera rotation in images. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Canadian conference on computer and robot vision, CRV ’05, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 460–467Google Scholar
  5. Haralick RM, Lee CN, Ottenberg K, Nölle M (1994) Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective pose estimation problem. Int J Comput Vis 13:331–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartley RI, Zisserman A (2004) Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521540518Google Scholar
  7. Horn BKP, Hilden H, Negahdaripour S (1988) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. J Opt Soc Am 5(7):1127–1135MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kosecka J, Zhang W (2002) Video compass. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on computer vision-part IV, ECCV ’02, Springer, London, pp 476–490Google Scholar
  9. Kukelova Z, Bujnak M, Pajdla T (2011) Closed-form solutions to minimal absolute pose problems with known vertical direction. In: Computer vision—ACCV 2010, lecture notes in computer science, vol 6493, pp 216–229Google Scholar
  10. Lepetit V, Moreno-Noguer F, Fua P (2009) Epnp: An accurate o(n) solution to the pnp problem. Int J Comput Vis 81:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Micusik B, Kosecka J (2009) Piecewise planar city 3d modeling from street view panoramic sequences. IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Miami, USA, pp 2906–2912Google Scholar
  13. Nistér D (2004) An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26:756–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollefeys M, Nistér D, Frahm JM, Akbarzadeh A, Mordohai P, Clipp B, Engels C, Gallup D, Kim SJ, Merrell P, Salmi C, Sinha S, Talton B, Wang L, Yang Q, Stewénius H, Yang R, Welch G, Towles H (2008) Detailed real-time urban 3d reconstruction from video. Int J Comput Vis 78:143–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robertson D, Cipolla R (2004) An image-based system for urban navigation. In: British machine vision conference, pp 819–828Google Scholar
  16. Rother C (2002) A new approach to vanishing point detection in architectural environments. Image Vis Comput 20(9-10):647–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R (2006) Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3d. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 papers, SIGGRAPH ’06, ACM, New York, pp 835–846Google Scholar
  18. Tardif JP, Pavlidis Y, Daniilidis K (2008) Monocular visual odometry in urban environments using an omnidirectional camera. In: IROS’08, pp 2531–2538Google Scholar
  19. Torii A, Havlena M, Pajdla T (2009) From google street view to 3d city models. In: Computer vision workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on 2009Google Scholar
  20. Werner T, Pajdla T (2001) Cheirality in epipolar geometry. Computer vision, IEEE international conference on 1: 548Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations