Virtual Reality

, Volume 15, Issue 2–3, pp 185–200 | Cite as

Augmenting aerial earth maps with dynamic information from videos

SI: Augmented Reality

Abstract

We introduce methods for augmenting aerial visualizations of Earth (from tools such as Google Earth or Microsoft Virtual Earth) with dynamic information obtained from videos. Our goal is to make Augmented Earth Maps that visualize plausible live views of dynamic scenes in a city. We propose different approaches to analyze videos of pedestrians and cars in real situations, under differing conditions to extract dynamic information. Then, we augment an Aerial Earth Maps (AEMs) with the extracted live and dynamic content. We also analyze natural phenomenon (skies, clouds) and project information from these to the AEMs to add to the visual reality. Our primary contributions are: (1) Analyzing videos with different viewpoints, coverage, and overlaps to extract relevant information about view geometry and movements, with limited user input. (2) Projecting this information appropriately to the viewpoint of the AEMs and modeling the dynamics in the scene from observations to allow inference (in case of missing data) and synthesis. We demonstrate this over a variety of camera configurations and conditions. (3) The modeled information from videos is registered to the AEMs to render appropriate movements and related dynamics. We demonstrate this with traffic flow, people movements, and cloud motions. All of these approaches are brought together as a prototype system for a real-time visualization of a city that is alive and engaging.

Keywords

Augmented reality Augmented virtual reality Video analysis Computer vision Computer graphics Tracking View synthesis Procedural rendering 

References

  1. Bouguet J-Y (2003) Pyramidal implementation of the lucas kanade feature tracker. In: Intel CorporationGoogle Scholar
  2. Buhmann MD, Ablowitz MJ (2003) Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge University, CambridgeMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen G, Esch G, Wonka P, Müller P, Zhang E (2008) Interactive procedural street modeling. ACM Trans Graph 27(3):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Efros AA, Berg EC, Mori G, Malik J (2003) Recognizing action at a distance. In: ICCV03, pp 726–733Google Scholar
  5. Frey B, MacKay D (1998) A revolution: belief propagation in graphs with cycles. In: Neural information processing systems, pp 479–485Google Scholar
  6. Girgensohn A, Kimber D, Vaughan J, Yang T, Shipman F, Turner T, Rieffel E, Wilcox L, Chen F, Dunnigan T (2007) Dots: support for effective video surveillance. In: ACM MULTIMEDIA ’07. ACM, New York, pp 423–432Google Scholar
  7. Harris MJ (2005) Real-time cloud simulation and rendering. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses. New York, p. 222Google Scholar
  8. Hartley RI (1997) In defense of the eight-point algorithm. PAMI Int J Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(6):580–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley R, Zisserman A (2000) Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Horry Y, Anjyo K-I, Arai K (1997) Tour into the picture: using a spidery mesh interface to make animation from a single image. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  11. Kanade T (2001) Eyevision system at super bowl 2001. http://www.ri.cmu.edu/events/sb35/tksuperbowl.html
  12. Klein G, Murray D (2007) Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces. In: Proceedings of sixth IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR’07)Google Scholar
  13. Koller-meier EB, Ade F (2001) Tracking multiple objects using the condensation algorithm. JRASGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosecka J, Zhang W (2002) Video compass. In: Proceedings of ECCV. Springer, London, pp 476–490Google Scholar
  15. Lewis JP (ed) (1989) Algorithms for solid noise synthesisGoogle Scholar
  16. Man P (2006) Generating and real-time rendering of clouds. In: Central European seminar on computer graphics, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  17. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  18. Perlin K (1985) An image synthesizer. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 19(3):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rabaud V, Belongie S (2006) Counting crowded moving objects. In: CVPR ’06: Proceedings of IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE Computer Society, pp 17–22Google Scholar
  20. Ramanan D, Forsyth DA (2003) Automatic annotation of everyday movements. In: NIPS. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 1987. ACM Press, New York, pp 25–34Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. In: GDC ’99: Proceedings of game developers conference. Miller Freeman Game Group, pp 768–782Google Scholar
  23. Sawhney HS, Arpa A, Kumar R, Samarasekera S, Aggarwal M, Hsu S, Nister D, Hanna K (2002) Video flashlights: real time rendering of multiple videos for immersive model visualization. In: 13th Eurographics workshop on Rendering. Eurographics Association, pp 157–168Google Scholar
  24. Sebe IO, Hu J, You S, Neumann U (2003) 3d video surveillance with augmented virtual environments. In: IWVS ’03: First ACM SIGMM international workshop on Video surveillance. ACM, New York, pp 107–112Google Scholar
  25. Seitz SM, Dyer CR (1996) View morphing. In: SIGGRAPH ’96. ACM, New York, pp 21–30Google Scholar
  26. Seitz SM, Curless B, Diebel J, Scharstein D, Szeliski R (2006) A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. In: IEEE CVPR ’06, pp 519–528Google Scholar
  27. Shao W, Terzopoulos D (2007) Autonomous pedestrians. Graphi Models 69(5):246–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shi J, Tomasi C (1994) Good features to track. In: Proceedings of IEEE CVPR. IEEE computer society, pp 593–600Google Scholar
  29. Smart J, Cascio J, Paffendorf J (2007) Metaverse roadmap: pathways to the 3d web. Metaverse: a cross-industry public foresight projectGoogle Scholar
  30. Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R (2006) Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3d. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH’06. ACM Press, New York, pp 835–846Google Scholar
  31. Treuille A, Cooper S, Popović Z (2006) Continuum crowds. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 papers, pp 1160–1168Google Scholar
  32. Turk G, O’Brien JF (1999) Shape transformation using variational implicit functions. In: SIGGRAPH ’99. New York, NY, pp 335–342Google Scholar
  33. Veenman CJ, Reinders MJT, Backer E (2001) Resolving motion correspondence for densely moving points. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23:54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang N (2004) Realistic and fast cloud rendering. J Graph Tools 9(3):21–40Google Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Krum DM, Coelho EM, Bowman DA (2007) Contextualized videos: Combining videos with environment models to support situational understanding. Abdom Imag 13:1568–1575Google Scholar
  36. Wood DM, Ball K, Lyon D, Norris C, Raab C (2006) A report on the surveillance society. Surveillance Studies Network, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Yilmaz A, Javed O, Shah M (2006) Object tracking: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 38(4):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zotti G, Groller ME (2005) A sky dome visualisation for identification of astronomical orientations. In: INFOVIS ’05. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, p 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kihwan Kim
    • 1
  • Sangmin Oh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jeonggyu Lee
    • 1
    • 3
  • Irfan Essa
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Kitware Inc.Clifton ParkUSA
  3. 3.Intel CorporationHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations