Virtual Reality

, 13:101 | Cite as

Multiscale traveling: crossing the boundary between space and scale

Original Article


Adding multiscale interaction capabilities to 3D virtual environments may permit work with huge virtual worlds that might otherwise be too large to manage. Multiscale technology has shown potential to support user interactions. This paper reports an experimental study of two multiscale traveling techniques. Our results show that while allowing a flexible control on travel speed and accuracy is beneficial, directly traversing the space-scale could be a challenge for users, probably due to difficulties in perceiving scalable virtual space and executing scaling operations. The results suggest that more research is needed to improve the understanding of the coupling of space and scale in multiscale user interface and to harness the full potentials of multiscale traveling techniques.


Navigation Multiscale Virtual environments 


  1. Bagrow L (1985) History of cartography. Precedent Publishers, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkowsky T, Freksa C (1997) Cognitive requirements on making and interpreting maps. In: Hirtle S, Frank A (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings of COSIT 97. Springer, Berlin, pp 347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bederson B, Hollan J (1994) Pad++: a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium of user interface software and technology (UIST ’94), pp 17–26Google Scholar
  4. Bell S (2002) Spatial cognition and scale: a child’s perspective. J Environ Psychol 22(1–2):9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benford S, Fahlén L, Bowers J, Fahlén L (1994) Managing mutual awareness in collaborative virtual environments, virtual reality software & technology. In: Proceedings of the VRST ’94 Conference, pp 223–236Google Scholar
  6. Bier EA (1986) Skitters and jacks: interactive 3-D positioning tools. In: 1986 Workshop on interactive 3-D graphics, pp 183–196Google Scholar
  7. Bowman D, Koller D, Hodges L (1997) Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In: Proceedings of the virtual reality annual international symposium, pp 45–52Google Scholar
  8. Combs T, Bederson BB (1999) Does zooming improve image browsing? In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on digital libraries, pp 130–137Google Scholar
  9. Darken RP, Sibert J (1996) Navigating large virtual spaces. Int J Hum Comput Interact 8(1):49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downs R, Stea D (1973) Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Durlach N, Allen G, Darken R, Garnett RL, Loomis J, Templeman J, von Wiegand TE (2000) Virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial behaviour: towards a comprehensive research agenda. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:593–615Google Scholar
  12. Elvins T, Nadeau D, Kirsh D (1997) Worldlets—3-D thumbnails for wayfinding in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium of user interface software and technology (UIST ’97), pp 21–30Google Scholar
  13. Evans GW, Pezdek K (1980) Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6(1):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furnas GW, Bederson BB (1995) Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces papers: navigating and scaling in 2-D space. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing system (CHI ’95), pp 234–241Google Scholar
  15. Ghosh P, Shneiderman B (1999) Zoom-only vs. overview-detail pair: a study in browsing techniques as applied to patient histories. University of Maryland Technical Report CS-TR-4028Google Scholar
  16. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Mifflin, HoughtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Golledge R (1999) Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge R (ed) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive maps and other spatial processes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 5–45Google Scholar
  18. Guiard Y, Beaudouin-Lafon M, Mottet D (1999) Navigation as multiscale pointing: extending Fitts’ model to very high precision tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing system (CHI ’99), pp 450–457Google Scholar
  19. Hanson A, Wernert E, Hughes S (1997) Constrained navigation environments. In: Scientific visualization: Dagstuhl ‘97 Proceedings, pp 95–104Google Scholar
  20. Hart R, Moore G (1973) The development of spatial cognition: a review. In: Stea B, Downs R (eds) Image and environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 226–234Google Scholar
  21. Hirtle SC, Hudson JH (1991) The acquisition of spatial knowledge. J Environ Psychol 11:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hornbæk K, Bederson B, Plaisant C (2002) Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without overview. Trans Comput Hum Interact 9:362–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huff M, Schwan S, Garsoffky B (2007) The spatial representation of dynamic scenes—an integrative approach. In: Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Ligozat G, Montello DR (eds) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Spatial cognition V: reasoning, action, interaction, pp 140–155Google Scholar
  24. Interrante V, O’Rourke E, Gray L, Anderson L, Ries B (2007) A Quantitative assessment of the impact on spatial understanding of exploring a complex immersive virtual environment using augmented real walking versus flying. In: Proceedings of the 13th eurographics symposium on virtual environments, pp 75–78Google Scholar
  25. Interrante V, Ries B, Anderson L (2007) Seven league boots: a new metaphor for augmented locomotion through large-scale immersive virtual environments. In: IEEE symposium on 3-D user interfaces, pp 167–170Google Scholar
  26. Jul S, Furnas GW (1998) Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium of user interface software and technology (UIST ’98), pp 97–106Google Scholar
  27. Kaufman L (1974) Sight and mind. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kopper R, Ni T, Bowman DA, Pinho M (2006) Design and evaluation of navigation techniques for multiscale virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on virtual reality, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  29. Kosslyn SM, Ball TM, Reiser BJ (1978) Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LaViola J, Feliz D, Keefe D, Zeleznick R (2001) Hands-free multi-scale navigation in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the symposium on interactive 3-D graphics, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  31. Leigh J, Johnson A (1996) Supporting transcontinental collaborative work in persistent virtual environments. In: IEEE Comput Graph Appl 16(4):47–51Google Scholar
  32. Leshed G, Velden T, Rieger O, Kot B, Sengers P (2008) In-car GPS navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment. In: Proceeding of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1675–1684Google Scholar
  33. Liben LS (2001) Thinking through maps. In: Gattis M (ed) Spatial schemas and abstract thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 44–77Google Scholar
  34. Lynch K (1960) Image of the city. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackinlay J, Card S, Roberston G (1990) Rapid controlled movement through a virtual 3-D workspace. Comput Graph 24(4):171–166Google Scholar
  36. Mapes DP, Moshell JM (1995) A two-handed interface for object manipulation in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 4(4):403–416Google Scholar
  37. McNamara TP, Hardy JK, Hirtle SC (1989) Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15:211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mine M (1995) Virtual environment interaction techniques. UNC Chapel Hill computer science technical report TR95-018Google Scholar
  39. Mine M, Brooks F, Squin C (1997) Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’97, pp 19–26Google Scholar
  40. Montello DR (2001) Spatial cognition. In: Smelser N, Baltes P (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 14771–14775Google Scholar
  41. Nielson GM, Olsen DR (1986) Direct manipulation techniques for 3-d objects using 2-D locator devices. In: 1986 Workshop on interactive 3-D graphics, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  42. Páez LB, da Silva-Fh JB, Marchionini G (1996) Disorientation in electronic environments: a study of hypertext and continuous zooming interfaces. In: Proceedings of ASIS’96, pp 58–66Google Scholar
  43. Parush A, Ahuvia S, Erev I (2007) Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: Winter S, Duckham M, Kulik L, Kuipers B (eds) Spatial information theory. Melbourne, pp 238–254Google Scholar
  44. Passini R (1984) Spatial representation: a wayfinding perspective. J Environ Psychol 4:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perlin K, Fox D (1993) Pad: an alternative approach to the computer interface. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH ’93, pp 57–64Google Scholar
  46. Piaget J, Inhelder B (1967) The child’s conception of space. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Pierce J, Pausch R (2004) Navigation with place representations and visible landmarks. In: Proceedings of VRST 2004, pp 173–180Google Scholar
  48. Plumlee MD, Ware C (2006) Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: cognitive costs of visual comparisons. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 13(2):179–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Presson C, Montello D (1988) Points of reference in spatial cognition: stalking the elusive landmark. Br J Develop Psychol 6:378–381Google Scholar
  50. Presson CC, DeLange N, Hazelrigg MD (1989) Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15:887–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rieser JJ, Pick HL, Ashmead DH, Garing AE (1995) Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:480–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinett W, Holloway R (1992) Implementation of flying, scaling and grabbing in virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the symposium on interactive 3-D graphics, pp 189–192Google Scholar
  53. Roskos-Ewoldsen B, McNamara TP, Shelton AL, Carr W (1998) Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 24:215–226Google Scholar
  54. Ruddle R, Payne S, Jones D (1997) Navigating buildings in “desk-top” virtual environments: experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. J Exp Psychol Appl 3(2):143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rump B, McNamara TP (2007) Updating in models of spatial memory. In: Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Montello DR (eds) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: spatial cognition V. pp 249–269Google Scholar
  56. Schaffer D, Zuo Z, Greenberg S, Bartram L, Dill J, Dubs S, Roseman M (1996) Navigating hierarchically clustered networks through fisheye and full-zoom methods. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 3(2):162–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stevens A, Coupe P (1978) Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cogn Psychol 10:422–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stoakley R, Conway M, Pausch R (1995) Virtual reality on a wim: interactive worlds in miniature. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing system (CHI ’95), pp 265–272Google Scholar
  59. Tan D, Robertson G, Czerwinski M (2001) Exploring 3-D navigation: combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing system (CHI ’2001), pp 418–425Google Scholar
  60. Thorndyke PW, Golding SE (1983) Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application. In: Spatial learning and reasoning skill, pp 195–217Google Scholar
  61. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tversky B (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Frank A, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings of COSIT’93. Springer, Germany, pp 14–24Google Scholar
  63. Vinson NG (1999). Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing system (CHI ’99), pp 278–285Google Scholar
  64. Ware C, Fleet D (1997) Context sensitive flying interface. In: Proceedings of symposium on interactive 3-D graphics, pp 127–130Google Scholar
  65. Williams B, Narasimham G, McNamara TP, Carr TH, Rieser JJ, Bodenheimer B (2006) Updating orientation in large virtual environments using scaled translational gain. In: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, pp 21–28Google Scholar
  66. Wilson PN, Foreman N, Tlauka M (1997) Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to a real environment. Hum Factors 39(4):526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Witmer B, Kline P (1998) Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 7:144–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Witmer BG, Bailey JH, Knerr BW, Parsons KC (1996) Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge. Int J Hum Comput Stud 45:413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang X (2008) A multiscale progressive model on virtual navigation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(4):243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang X, Furnas GW (2002) Social interaction in multiscale CVEs. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on collaborative virtual environments, pp 31–38Google Scholar
  71. Zhang X, Furnas GW (2005) mCVEs: using cross-scale collaboration to support user interaction with multiscale structures. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 14(1):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations